99-year-old Quebec woman threatened with criminal charges for failing to appear for jury duty

Authored by cbc.ca and submitted by rytis
image for 99-year-old Quebec woman threatened with criminal charges for failing to appear for jury duty

Edward Ritchuk's 99-year-old mother-in-law is in a long-term care home, bedridden, hard of hearing and unable to hold a conversation.

So he found it pretty odd when Marion Lenko was summoned to court for jury selection.

"When I first received the letter, I thought it was a joke," he said.

The summons was delivered first to her seniors' residence. Then in December, it was sent to Ritchuk's home in Beaconsfield, Que., an on-island Montreal suburb. She was expected to appear for selection earlier this month.

Richuk said he emailed her son, who lives in Florida and is legally responsible for Lenko. But he said her son never responded to the summons, failing to ask for an exemption.

"Then this week, I received a letter from the justice ministry saying that she has to appear on the 31st of January in court or procedures will be taken against her," he said.

Lenko was born in July 1923 and is now living under 24-hour medical care in Dollard-des-Ormeaux, Que., in the West Island.

Ritchuk said he can't believe that there was no verification done before his mother-in-law was sent a letter saying she may be criminally liable for not fulfilling her jury duty.

Unable to get through on phone

Ritchuk says he tried calling the number provided in the letter, but was sent to an automated system and says he was unable to get through to anyone.

As far as he could tell, someone needs to appear in person. But Ritchuk can't represent his mother-in-law. It's her son who has power of attorney, and he's more than 2,400 kilometres away.

Ritchuk's wife died a couple of years ago and he has stayed in touch with Lenko, having known her since 1972. Now, he says he's stuck in the middle and is unsure what to do next.

Edward Ritchuk says he's known his late wife's mother since 1972, but he has no power to make decisions for her. (Valeria Cori-Manocchio/CBC)

Isabelle Boily, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Justice, said a person may be disqualified from serving as a juror or there may be circumstances preventing them from fulfilling their obligations.

"If so, it is possible to request an exemption or postponement of participation by completing the form received with the notice," Boily said in an email.

"This form must be sent to the sheriff with the supporting documents within 20 days of receiving the notice."

In addition, as indicated in the notice of summons of the prospective juror, it is possible for prospective jurors over the age of 65 to request the exemption by calling the sheriff's office within the required 20-day period.

Boily said it is possible for a family member to call in their place.

Eric Sutton, a criminal defence attorney in Montreal, said any Canadian citizen over the age of 18 can be summoned for jury duty. Information on exemptions comes with the summons, and the summons is sent by the sheriff's office based on the polling list, not birthdays.

It's up to the person who receives the summons to invoke or apply for the exemption with the forms provided, he said. He said the documents need to be filled out and proof provided.

He's skeptical that a simple phone call to the ministry or sheriff's office would be enough.

"From what I understand, this family tried to phone and to no avail," Sutton said, noting the exception would have very likely been accepted in this case were the documents filled out.

"Now she's facing this fear of possibly being fined or imprisoned. I saw it in the paperwork. That's pretty tough medicine for a 99-year-old woman who is hard of hearing. Shameful."

jiwijoo on January 22nd, 2023 at 21:31 UTC »

One time I got jury duty when I was about 9-10 years old. My folks joked about and brought it up to the courthouse in town. They had no clue that they picked a kid for duty. I swear these people draw names out of a hat.

dan525 on January 22nd, 2023 at 20:20 UTC »

This process worked exactly how it should. You have a civic duty to appear for jury duty. And when an official summons is sent to your home, you should not just ignore it.

When the judge in charge of the jury pool recognized that one of their summons had been ignored they issued an order that says 'explain why this was ignored or face contempt.' They now have the opportunity to fix up their first mistake before a warrant for her arrest gets issued.

The alternative is that juries are not made of your peers, but only of the people who show up. I assure you if you ever have a case that goes to jury you want a fair cross section of your community and not just the people who want to show up.

And putting all in context, the article specifically states that the family had started doing the correct thing.

Richuk said he emailed her son, who lives in Florida and is legally responsible for Lenko. But he said her son never responded to the summons, failing to ask for an exemption.

She has a guardian, who just didn't do his damn job. It is unreasonable to expect the court to divine the reason each and every person ignored summons for jury duty. That's what the next hearing would be for.

roostersnuffed on January 22nd, 2023 at 15:15 UTC »

Lol, how is there not an age cut off? Not sure what it should be, but something before 99yo

My great grandma is 95 and she does not have the mental capacity to be making life changing legal decisions.