Investigators on Robert Mueller’s team are vexed at Attorney General William Barr’s characterization of the special counsel’s report.
They say Barr “failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry,” The New York Times reported on Wednesday.
A number of special counsel investigators told associates that the evidence they gathered on the question of obstruction was both “alarming and significant,” the Post reported.
The paper also quoted a person familiar with the probe as saying the evidence was “much more acute than Barr suggested.”.
ASSOCIATED PRESS Investigators on Robert Mueller’s team were reportedly frustrated by the summary Attorney General William Barr issued to Congress on March 24.
Some investigators were particularly miffed that Barr had not released the official summaries of the report that their team had prepared, the Post reported.
The NYT story about unspecified troubling findings in report is as accurate as the NYT saying Mueller’s staff didn’t leak. »