Iran embassy attack: in Wang-Blinken call, China urges US to play constructive Middle East role

Authored by scmp.com and submitted by FirmConcentrate2962
image for Iran embassy attack: in Wang-Blinken call, China urges US to play constructive Middle East role

Wang also stressed the “inviolable” right to security of diplomatic institutions and the need to respect the sovereignty of Iran and Syria”, the ministry said.

Confirming the call on Thursday, the Chinese foreign ministry said Wang “expressed China’s strong condemnation” of a deadly attack Israel is accused of carrying out on the Iranian embassy in Syria earlier this month.

In a phone call with his US counterpart Antony Blinken this week, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi urged Washington to play a “constructive role” in the Middle East, Beijing said on Friday.

The US State Department said earlier that Blinken used the call to ask Beijing to use its influence to dissuade Iran from striking Israel . Similar calls were made to his Turkish and Saudi Arabian counterparts, the department said.

In Beijing on Friday, ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning quoted Wang as saying it “is imperative that the Gaza conflict be brought to an end as soon as possible. China calls on all parties to the conflict to … cease fire immediately and to prevent a humanitarian crisis.

“China will continue to play a constructive role in resolving the Middle East issue based on justice and correctness … The United States, in particular, should also play a constructive role.”

Washington’s efforts to engage Beijing came after at least seven of Tehran’s military advisers, including General Mohammad Reza Zahedi, who managed Iranian operations in Syria and Lebanon, were killed in the air strike in Damascus.

Israel has not claimed responsibility for the attack, but both Iran and Syria blamed Israel for the deaths. The New York Times cited four unnamed Israeli officials as acknowledging Israel carried out the attack.

Concerns are rising in Israel that Iran could mount a direct attack on Israel within days, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday. But a person briefed by the Iranian leadership told the Journal that no final decision had been made.

Despite the potential spillover, there have been no public diplomatic exchanges between China and Iran since the air strike.

Chang Hua left his post as China’s ambassador to Iran earlier this month as a part of a regular reshuffle of diplomats and Beijing has not appointed an envoy for the Gaza war.

After the air strike, Geng Shuang, China’s envoy to the United Nations, said such assaults “must be stopped immediately”, adding that “spillover risks [are] becoming increasingly evident, and the situation in the Middle East has become precarious”.

Geng also directly condemned Israel’s frequent assaults on Syria and Lebanon, saying they “seriously violated the sovereignty of the countries, and increased tensions throughout the region”.

He called on countries with significant influence over Israel to play “a constructive role”, a clear reference to the US.

Blinken’s call is not the first time Washington has asked Beijing to intervene in Gaza-related conflict, especially in relation to Tehran.

In January, the US asked China to urge Iran to rein in attacks in the Red Sea mounted by Iranian-aligned Houthi militants. However, the request appeared to yield little result.

The Pentagon also invited China to safeguard commercial traffic in the Red Sea, but Beijing has yet to accept. Beijing, which has a naval base in Djibouti, says it has not sent any forces to guard the region from the Houthi attacks.

03:21 US-led coalition strikes Iran-backed Houthi fighters in Yemen US-led coalition strikes Iran-backed Houthi fighters in Yemen

Jean-Loup Samaan, a senior research fellow of the Middle East Institute at the National University of Singapore, said the US engagement with China indicated that Washington considered Beijing to be a “major player” in the Middle East.

He said it showed that the US saw China as “one that can influence regional rivalries”, and suggested that the US and China “share common interests in the region, which is stability and access to its energy supplies”.

“Something very different from what we see in the US-China relationship in [the Asia-Pacific],” he added.

But China’s capacity for and interest in mediating in the conflicts might be limited.

“The conflict revealed a Chinese policy that is reluctant to get trapped in regional disputes the way the US and other Western powers have gotten for decades,” he said.

“Because China’s strategy towards the Middle East emphasises trade ties and non-interference in domestic affairs, its government does not want to jeopardise its credibility among Arab partners.”

10:26 Yemen’s Houthi fighters behind Red Sea attacks threaten to disrupt global trade Yemen’s Houthi fighters behind Red Sea attacks threaten to disrupt global trade

Yin Gang, a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said Beijing was likely urging Tehran not to escalate the situation.

“China is probably following consistent diplomatic practice [since the Gaza war], which should be to advise Iran to stay calm and ask for international help in case of a conflict spillover.”

Noting China’s permanent membership of the United Nations Security Council, Yin said the US looked to China because of its global impact on security issues while not being one of the conflict parties such as Russia, which sent forces in Syria.

ohea on April 12nd, 2024 at 15:56 UTC »

China's policy in the Middle East to date has been to play nicely with everyone and stay out of the regional rivalries (Iran-Saudi) and Palestine situation as much as possible. But you really can't be geopolitically active in the region without picking sides to some extent, because the fault lines run so deep. China has a major stake in keeping the straits open and the oil flowing but (wisely, considering US experience) doesn't want to make any kind of military commitments in the region or show too much open favoritism. The upside is that China has friendly relationships and strong commercial ties with everyone- the downside is that China can't use much leverage without getting tugged into the regional conflicts.

Meanwhile the US is already maximally committed to both Saudi and Israel. So a message from China to "play a constructive role" has a surface-level meaning of "quit being so partial to Saudi and Israel" and a deeper meaning of "we want to see a peace process but we're not in a position to make it happen ourselves."

chimugukuru on April 12nd, 2024 at 14:30 UTC »

China is scared to death of a wider escalation in the Middle East. Their primary concern is uninterrupted crude oil shipments. 75-80% of China's oil is imported and 2/3 of this comes from the Middle East. Their navy is in no condition to play any sort of prominent role in protecting shipments that far from home.

WhatAreYouSaying05 on April 12nd, 2024 at 14:16 UTC »

This is odd. China encouraging the US to take action on something?