What is included in my trial?
During your trial you will have complete digital access to FT.com with everything in both of our Standard Digital and Premium Digital packages.
Standard Digital includes access to a wealth of global news, analysis and expert opinion. Premium Digital includes access to our premier business column, Lex, as well as 15 curated newsletters covering key business themes with original, in-depth reporting. For a full comparison of Standard and Premium Digital, click here.
Change the plan you will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the “Settings & Account” section.
What happens at the end of my trial?
If you do nothing, you will be auto-enrolled in our premium digital monthly subscription plan and retain complete access for 65 € per month.
For cost savings, you can change your plan at any time online in the “Settings & Account” section. If you’d like to retain your premium access and save 20%, you can opt to pay annually at the end of the trial.
You may also opt to downgrade to Standard Digital, a robust journalistic offering that fulfils many user’s needs. Compare Standard and Premium Digital here.
Any changes made can be done at any time and will become effective at the end of the trial period, allowing you to retain full access for 4 weeks, even if you downgrade or cancel.
mwa12345 on November 3rd, 2023 at 09:23 UTC »
Submarine deal is still on?
petepro on November 3rd, 2023 at 08:25 UTC »
I know this will happen when Labor coming to power no matter how much showmanship in the beginning.
Severe_County_5041 on November 3rd, 2023 at 02:30 UTC »
full article:
Australia’s prime minister Anthony Albanese embarks on a state visit to China this weekend that will underline a dramatic turnaround in relations between the countries, which had rapidly deteriorated in recent years over issues ranging from trade to security.
Ties had reached a 50-year nadir, with Beijing imposing tariffs and sanctions on Australian goods and detaining Australian citizens, while officials in Canberra called for investigations into Chinese political influence and the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic.
The Labor prime minister’s state visit marks the culmination of a recent rapprochement, driven by business weariness with trade tensions and a desire to depart from his predecessor’s more hostile stance.
But Albanese faces the challenge of continuing to repair relations with Australia’s largest trading partner even as his administration forges closer security ties with the US to counter Beijing’s influence in the region.
Richard Maude, senior fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute, said the rapid thaw represented a surprising reversal from the “very, very deep lows of a few years ago” but would not undermine Australia’s co-operation with the US. “There is no shift in Australia’s position on Indo-Pacific security and its role in creating a balance of power,” he said.
Albanese’s China trip, the first for an Australian prime minister since Malcolm Turnbull’s in 2016, comes on the heels of a visit to Washington last month. In a speech to top US officials, Albanese said Australia needed to be “clear-eyed” about its relationship with China, highlighting his government’s “patient, calibrated and deliberate” approach.
His task will be to maintain that balance even as the Biden administration continues to increase pressure on China, imposing export controls on next-generation semiconductor equipment and strengthening security co-operation in Asia through alliances such as Aukus, which aims to give Canberra access to nuclear-powered submarines.
Albanese — who has been dubbed “Airbus Albo” by local media for his globetrotting schedule — begins a three-day state visit with a trade show in Shanghai on Saturday. He is then set to meet China’s president Xi Jinping and premier Li Qiang on Monday.
Such an audience was nearly unthinkable just a few years ago. Frictions have been rising since Canberra publicly opposed Beijing’s claims over the South China Sea, banned Chinese telecoms equipment maker Huawei from its 5G network and raised concerns over China’s influence in domestic politics.
Scott Morrison, Albanese’s conservative predecessor, called for a “weapons inspection”-style independent inquiry into the outbreak of Covid-19 in Wuhan, triggering a furious backlash from Beijing.
China retaliated by targeting Australia’s economy, imposing trade sanctions and tariffs on about A$20bn ($13bn) worth of goods including wine, coal, lobsters and barley, though Canberra diverted some shipments to other markets, expanding the country’s trade balance.
Military incidents between Chinese and Australian forces, which Canberra has decried as acts of intimidation, have also occurred more regularly.
Morrison warned of an “arc of autocracy” in reference to China’s role as a global superpower but has since said his strategy was to resist, rather than provoke, Beijing.
Following Albanese’s election in May 2022, his administration has pursued a more balanced tone, taking a firm line against hostile behaviour but refraining from critical rhetoric, recognising that Australia is still reliant on China for more than one in every four of its export dollars.
Albanese met Xi on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Indonesia in November last year, while Penny Wong, Australia’s foreign minister, met her counterpart Wang Yi in Beijing a month later.
The bridge-building has paid dividends, with Beijing considering unwinding economic sanctions on wine and accepting coal shipments, though some analysts argue that the economic coercion failed to achieve its aims, with Australia finding alternative markets.
China last month also released Australian journalist Cheng Lei, who had been in detention for more than three years.
Canberra, for its part, has opted against revoking a lease held by a Chinese company on the northern port of Darwin after a national security review and is set to remove anti-dumping measures on the import of Chinese wind turbines, a move welcomed by Beijing.
Xiao Qian, China’s ambassador to Australia, said at an Asia Society event in Melbourne last month that he hoped the two countries could enter an era of mutual understanding. “China regards Australia as a friend. There is no reason for Australia to see China as a threat,” he said.
Few observers expect the trip to generate meaningful bilateral developments, though announcements are possible on co-operation in areas such as green energy and climate change alongside a commitment to increasing trade.
“Working with China has become much more difficult for western countries,” said Maude. After years of discord, China and Australia lacked “an active or deep agenda to work together in areas where there might be mutual benefit”.
Australia’s closer military engagement with the US may also overshadow the symbolism of the trip, which will coincide with the 50-year anniversary of Gough Whitlam’s 1973 visit to China, the first by an Australian prime minister and a moment celebrated by both sides.
Canberra this year announced an overhaul of its military posture in direct response to China’s build-up in the region, while the Aukus trilateral defence partnership with the US and UK seeks to strengthen the allies’ deterrence in the Pacific.
Euan Graham, a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, said Albanese needed to avoid the “foreign policy trap” of prioritising the improved health of the relationship over national interest and alliances in the region. “It is a bit of a national weakness that Australia can easily flip from principle to pragmatism,” he said.
Albanese stressed that he would broach the South China Sea and human rights issues, telling national broadcaster ABC that Beijing “[knows] where we stand”. He said on Wednesday that he would also raise the case of Yang Hengjun, the Chinese-Australian writer who has been imprisoned in China since 2019.
“The Chinese will be smiling through gritted teeth,” said Richard McGregor, senior fellow for east Asia at the Lowy Institute think-tank. But he added that the very fact of the visit was a positive signal. “The medium is the message,” he said. “The trip itself is symbolic of the two sides having a firmer foundation.”