New recycling method ‘recovers 98% of lithium from EV batteries’

Authored by imeche.org and submitted by randolphquell

A new recycling method can recover 100% of aluminium and 98% of lithium used in electric vehicle (EV) batteries, its developers have said.

The process, which aims to solve bottlenecks and wastage in EV battery recycling – an important factor in their sustainability – was developed at Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden.

The method also minimises the loss of valuable raw materials such as nickel, cobalt and manganese, the research announcement said. No expensive or harmful chemicals are required in the process because the researchers use oxalic acid – an organic acid that can be found in plants such as rhubarb and spinach.

“So far, no one has managed to find exactly the right conditions for separating this much lithium using oxalic acid, whilst also removing all the aluminium. Since all batteries contain aluminium, we need to be able to remove it without losing the other metals,” said Léa Rouquette, PhD student at Chalmers.

In the university laboratory, the pulverised contents of used car battery cells, which takes the form of a finely ground black powder, is dissolved in the acid. By fine-tuning the temperature, concentrations and time taken, the researchers say their new process has provided “remarkable” results.

“We need alternatives to inorganic chemicals. One of the biggest bottlenecks in today’s processes is removing residual materials like aluminium. This is an innovative method that can offer the recycling industry new alternatives and help solve problems that hinder development,” said Martina Petranikova, associate professor at Chalmers.

The aqueous-based recycling method is called hydrometallurgy. In traditional hydrometallurgy, all the metals in an EV battery cell are dissolved in an inorganic acid. The ‘impurities’ such as aluminium and copper are then removed, followed by separate recovery of valuable metals such as cobalt, nickel, manganese and lithium. Even though the amount of residual aluminium and copper is small it requires several purification steps, the researchers said, and each step in this process can cause lithium loss.

With the new method, the researchers reverse the order and recover the lithium and aluminium first. The mixture of pulverised waste and oxalic acid is filtered, leaving aluminium and lithium in the liquid and other metals in the solid.

This reduces the waste of valuable metals needed to make new batteries, the researchers said.

The next step in the process is to separate the aluminium and lithium. “Since the metals have very different properties, we don’t think it’ll be hard to separate them. Our method is a promising new route for battery recycling – a route that definitely warrants further exploration,” said Rouquette.

“As the method can be scaled up, we hope it can be used in industry in future years,” added Petranikova.

The group is involved in various collaborations with companies to develop EV battery recycling. It is a partner in major R&D projects, such as Volvo and Northvolt's Nybat project.

corrado33 on October 23rd, 2023 at 20:37 UTC »

Eh...

I'm a chemist. What they're doing is essentially something called "separation of metallic ions" or 'ion separation."

It's an experiment I used to run with my students with slightly easier metals.

The problem with this method is... well... everything. First, the good.

It's WONDERFUL that they found a method that reliably separates the lithium and aluminum. That, in itself, is the bulk of this discovery.

The three main downsides are... vast... however.

Energy. This method takes... a ton... of energy. First you've gotta disassemble the car battery enough that you can crush it up safely, then you've gotta crush it up, then you've gotta dissolve that crushed up material into.... Very toxic materials. That metal "powder" gets dissolved into very strong acids, often with some sort of oxidizer mixed in, generally (although I'm not 100% certain for this process) producing lots of nasty gasses along the way. This acid and oxidant get used up (pretty quickly), so will constantly need to be replenished. You'd be surprised how much concentrated acid it takes to dissolve small pieces of metal. This method is super... super nasty. The experiment is awful. It's super dirty and produces a ton of just nasty stuff. (We stunk up our entire building because a hood failed when off gassing some sulfur compounds.) But I used it to show students that... not all reactions are "perfect" and you won't always get what you expect.

The main downside is just... energy usage for not only the recovery itself, but also for the energy used to make the acids they need to do this. Sure, if we have "free" energy from solar panels, sure, this is great (kinda getting into the chicken/egg problem, just like we have with nuclear energy), but else if we're using fossil fuels to do this then.... yeah I'm unsure.

Von_Quixote on October 23rd, 2023 at 19:57 UTC »

There’s always a “by the way”.

What happens to the waste Oxalic and its contaminants? What’s the process? Where is this process happening and what are the regulating guidelines? Who watches the watchmen?

Ixziga on October 23rd, 2023 at 15:53 UTC »

Need to know the cost effectiveness of the process but that is an incredible recovery rate. We don't currently have enough lithium production to meet a lot of Western nation's 2035 targets for EV production, lithium recycling isn't really something we can do commercially yet but it's one of the variables we're hoping to hit to reduce the demand of new lithium for batteries.