All news in Canada will be removed from Facebook, Instagram within weeks: Meta

Authored by ctvnews.ca and submitted by CTVNEWS
image for All news in Canada will be removed from Facebook, Instagram within weeks: Meta

Discovering news articles and videos on Facebook and Instagram will soon become a relic of the past, as Meta announced it is officially ending news availability in Canada.

Meta said Tuesday that within a few weeks, it will remove news for all Canadian users of its popular Facebook and Instagram platforms.

In June, the company started running a test that limited news for up to five per cent of users, but now it says it is moving out of the testing phase.

"In order to provide clarity to the millions of Canadians and businesses who use our platforms, we are announcing today that we have begun the process of ending news availability permanently in Canada," said Rachel Curran, head of public policy for Meta Canada. Curran previously served as a policy adviser for former prime minister Stephen Harper.

That means Canadians will no longer be able to share or view news articles and other content posted by publishers and broadcasters, including international outlets.

News links to articles, reels -- which are short-form videos -- or stories, which are photos and videos that disappear after 24 hours, are also expected to be affected by the block.

People outside of Canada will not see a change.

Paul Deegan, president of News Media Canada, said this "intemperate" action will harm user experience and devalue the Facebook platform.

"Without access to real fact-based news created by real journalists, Facebook will become far less attractive to users and advertisers," Deegan said in a statement. "We expect more and more advertisers and their agencies will begin pulling advertising from the platform in response to this unilateral, undemocratic, and unreasonable move."

The federal government and some companies have already retaliated by ending advertising with Meta.

Meta said it is defining news content based on how it's described in the Liberal government's Online News Act, which became law earlier this summer.

It says the move to block news is a response to the bill, which requires tech giants to enter into agreements that compensate Canadian news outlets for content shared or otherwise repurposed on their platforms.

"For many months, we have been transparent about our concerns with the Online News Act. It is based on the incorrect premise that Meta benefits unfairly from news content shared on our platforms, when the reverse is actually true," Curran said.

"News outlets voluntarily share content on Facebook and Instagram to expand their audiences and help their bottom line. In contrast, we know the people using our platforms don't come to us for news."

Ottawa has said the law creates a level playing field between online advertising giants and the shrinking news industry.

The federal government has said that since 2008, close to 500 media outlets in 335 communities across Canada have closed, with more than 20,000 journalists losing their job, while Google and Meta continue to bring in billions in advertising dollars.

"Google and Facebook earn 80 per cent of all digital advertising revenue in Canada. Meanwhile, hundreds of newsrooms have closed," said Canadian Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge in a statement.

"A free and independent press is fundamental to our democracy, and Canadians expect tech giants to follow the law in our country."

In its own statement, CBC/Radio-Canada said Meta's move means people who have come to rely on the platforms for news are now "left with only unverified sources in their feeds."

The public broadcaster said the company's decision is "irresponsible and an abuse of their market power," adding that it and other Canadian media organizations are urging Meta to come to the negotiating table and compensate them for news content.

The Online News Act will come into effect by the end of the year, as the Liberal government develops regulations -- a process Meta has said it is not interested in being a part of.

"In the future, we hope the Canadian government will recognize the value we already provide the news industry and consider a policy response that upholds the principles of a free and open internet, champions diversity and innovation and reflects the interests of the entire Canadian media landscape," Curran said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2023.

CTV News is a division of Bell Media, which is part of BCE Inc.

ColdSnickersBar on August 1st, 2023 at 18:44 UTC »

Here’s some reminders of FBs behavior:

⁠⁠⁠When Facebook's own research team discovered that posts that get the "angry face" emoji created more engagement, they made the choice to prioritize posts that get the "angry face" 5x more in other feeds than other posts. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/10/26/facebook-angry-emoji-algorithm/ ⁠⁠⁠Facebook's own research showed that a test account with moderate conservative leanings took only 1 day to start getting QAnon content. They nicknamed the test "Carol's Journey to QAnon", and despite this, allowed QAnon to remain on the platform for 13 more months. More than a year after the FBI designated them as a domestic terrorist threat: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/facebook-knew-radicalized-users-rcna3581 ⁠⁠⁠Their own research showed that suggesting posts to users that their friends have shared radicalized people by giving pschological permission to have extreme views. Basically "your uncle shared this racist post!" gives people the greenlight to also share the racist post. Despite this, Zuckerberg himself refused to allow it to be fixed, saying that it would negatively impact growth: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Facebook_leak#Promoting_anger-provoking_posts ⁠⁠⁠Their VP of Global Policy Joel Kaplan is a former Bush advisor and conservative lobbiest. This is important to know for a few of the next points: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Kaplan ⁠⁠⁠Breitbart has repeatedly had enough "strikes" to be removed from FB's News tab, but had them waved away personally by Joel Kaplan. The News tab's policies were put into effect to address the concerns around misinformation, saying that FB would remove anyone from the tab that misinformed. Breitbart is still on there today. Facebook endorses the accuracy of Breitbart's reporting by excusing their strikes. https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-files-breitbart-news-tab-employee-objections-2021-10 ⁠⁠⁠When FB employees noticed that the Groups feature was creating new extremist and Neo Nazi groups, they made fixes to tamp down on the hate. Joel Kaplan personally ensured that the fixes were reversed, and again said that doing this would disproportionately affect conservatives: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/06/28/facebook-zuckerberg-trump-hate/ ⁠⁠⁠Joel Kaplan prevented Facebook from disclosing the effect that Russian disinformation agents had on the platform, again saying this would disproportionately affect conservatives: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanmac/mark-zuckerberg-joel-kaplan-facebook-alex-jones ⁠⁠⁠Research has been published showing that 13% of suicidal teen girls in the UK trace their first suicidal thought to Instagram. Since learning this, Meta has chosen to make Instagram Kids, an Instagram for children: https://gizmodo.com/lawmakers-ask-zuckerberg-to-drop-instagram-for-kids-aft-1847683217 ⁠⁠⁠In order to discredit the Whistleblower, Frances Haugen, Facebook intentionally deepened political divides as a strategy. They went to the GOP and warned them that she was a leftist political activist trying to take away conservative voices; and then went to Dem lawmakers and claimed she is a GOP political operative trying to punish Facebook for banning Trump. FB cynically tried to deepen the cracks in our damaged system just to stick it to the whistlerblower: https://nypost.com/2021/12/29/facebook-tried-to-divide-dems-gop-over-whistleblower-report/ ⁠⁠⁠Facebook sat back and watched as its platform was used to organize a genocide. All they had to do was put the brakes on FB in one small East-Asian country, which wouldn't have even affected their budget, but despite repeated pleas, they just allowed it to be used to kill people. “In the end, there was so little for Facebook to gain from its continued presence in Burma, and the consequences for the Rohingya people could not have been more dire.": https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/dec/06/rohingya-sue-facebook-myanmar-genocide-us-uk-legal-action-social-media-violence

Facebook has been intentionally crafted by its creators to be an addictive mental illness machine. They knowingly made these choices, choosing addiction and hate and extremism every time.

Copy and paste this wherever you can!

fleshbaby on August 1st, 2023 at 18:33 UTC »

So these apps that were invented to simply connect actual people will be without extra shit. Sounds fine. My facebook is 90% ads. I barely see any posts from my contacts.

thisismySFWprofile on August 1st, 2023 at 17:57 UTC »

If that means that people won't get Canadian news from Facebook, then, honestly, what's the downside? Having to remember some news websites?