Sen. Bernie Sanders says millions of people can’t find a doctor. He’s mostly right.

Authored by politifact.com and submitted by newnemo

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., has long championed a government-sponsored "Medicare for All" health program to solve long-standing problems in the United States, where we pay much more for health care than people in other countries but are often sicker and have a shorter average life expectancy.

Nevertheless, he realizes his passion project has little chance in today’s political environment.

"We are far from a majority in the Senate. We have no Republican support … and I’m not sure that I could get half of the Democrats on that bill," Sanders said in recent remarks to community health advocates.

Sanders has switched his focus to include, among other things, expanding the primary care workforce.He introduced legislation in July that would invest $100 billion over five years to expand community health centers and provide training for primary care doctors, nurses, dentists and other health professionals.

"Tens of millions of Americans live in communities where they cannot find a doctor while others have to wait months to be seen," Sanders said in a press statement issued when the bill was introduced. He said this scenario leads not only to more human suffering and unnecessary deaths "but wastes tens of billions a year" because people who "could not access the primary care they need" often end up in emergency rooms and hospitals.

Is that true? Are there really tens of millions of Americans who can’t find a doctor? We decided to check it out.

Our first stop was the senator’s office to ask for the source of that statement. But no one answered our query.

So, we poked around on our own. For years, academic researchers and policy experts have debated and dissected the potential scarcity of primary care in the United States, using "primary care desert" and "primary care health professional shortage area" to evaluate the extent of the problem through data.n.

Across the board, however, the numbers suggest that this access to care is a problem issue for many Americans.

The Association of American Medical Colleges projects a shortage of up to 48,000 primary care physicians by 2034, depending on variables like retirements and the number of new physicians entering the workforce.

How does that translate to people’s ability to find a doctor? The federal government’s Health Resources and Services Administration publishes widely referred to data that compares the number of primary care physicians in an area with its population. For primary care, if the population-to-provider ratio is generally at least 3,500 to 1, it’s considered a "health professional shortage area."

Based on that measure, 100 million people in the United States live in a geographic area, are part of a targeted population, or are served by a health care facility where there is a shortage of primary care providers. If all of these people want doctors and cannot find them, that figure would be well within Sanders’ "tens of millions" claim.

The metric is a meaningful way to measure the impact of primary care, experts said. In those areas, "you see life expectancies of up to a year less than in other areas," said Russ Phillips, a physician who is director of Harvard Medical School’s Center for Primary Care. "The differences are critically important."

Another way to think about primary care shortages is to evaluate the extent to which people report having a usual source of care, meaning a clinic or doctor’s office they’d visit if they were sick or needed health care advice. By that measure, 27% of adults said they lack such a location or person to rely on, or that they used the emergency room for primary care in 2020, according to a scorecard published by the Milbank Memorial Fund and the Physicians Foundation, which publish research on health care providers and the health care system.

The figure was notably lower in 2010 at nearly 24%, said Christopher Koller, president of the Milbank Memorial Fund. "And it’s happening when insurance is increasing, at the time of the Affordable Care Act."

The U.S. had an adult population of about 258 million in 2020. Twenty-seven percent of 258 million reveals that about 70 million adults lacked a usual source of care that year, a figure well within Sanders’ estimate.

Still, it doesn’t necessarily follow that all those people want or need a primary care provider, some experts say.

"Men in their 20s, if they get their weight and blood pressure checked and get screened for sexually transmitted infections and behavioral risk factors, they don’t need to see a regular clinician unless things arise," said Mark Fendrick, an internal medicine physician who is director of the University of Michigan Center for Value-Based Insurance Design.

Not everyone agrees that young men don’t need a usual source of care. But removing men in their 20s from the tally reduces the number by about 23 million people. That leaves 47 million without a usual source of care, still within Sanders’ broad "tens of millions" claim.

In his comments, Sanders refers specifically to Americans being unable to find a doctor, but many people see other types of medical professionals for primary care, such as nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

Seventy percent of nurse practitioners focus on primary care, for example, according to the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. To the extent that these types of health professionals absorb some of the demand for primary care physician services, there will be fewer people who can’t find a primary care provider, and that may dent Sanders’ figures.

Finally, there’s the question of wait times. Sanders claims that people must wait months before they can get an appointment. A survey by physician staffing company Merritt Hawkins found that it took an average of 20.6 days to get an appointment for a physical with a family physician in 2022. But that figure was 30% lower than the 29.3-day wait in 2017. Geography can make a big difference, however. In 2022, people waited an average of 44 days in Portland, Oregon, compared with eight days in Washington, D.C.

Sanders’ claim that there are "tens of millions" of people who live in communities where they can’t find a doctor aligns with published data we reviewed. The federal government estimates that 100 million people live in areas where there is a shortage of primary care providers. Another study found that some 70 million adults reported they don’t have a usual source of care or use the emergency department when they need medical care.

At the same time, several factors can affect people’s primary care experience. Some people may neither want nor need a primary care physician; others may be seen by nonphysician primary care providers.

Finally, on the question of wait times, the available data does not support Sanders’ claim that people must wait for months to be seen by a primary care provider. There was wide variation depending on where people lived, however.

Overall, Sanders accurately described the difficulty that tens of millions of people likely face in finding a primary care doctor.

twesterm on July 31st, 2023 at 14:55 UTC »

Everything about our medical insurance system is pretty fucked. Even if you have insurance, you're still going to have a bad time.

You essentially have to have your pay garnished by a few thousand dollars a year. If you are sick, you need to make sure you find a Dr that takes your insurance. If you need a medical procedure done that requires anesthesia, you have to make sure you find a Dr and an anesthesiologist who takes your insurance. You have to hope that your insurance covers whatever is bringing you to the Dr. They can say no for pretty much any reason they want and they absolutely will. They are in the business of making money, not caring for their customers. After you've found a Dr and an anesthesiologist and know you're covered, you have to cover the deductible. You have to pay the yearly fee just to have insurance, but then you have to pay further money just to use it. Depending on your plan, this could easily be thousands of dollars more ontop of what you're already paying. After you've proved your devotion to your insurance provider you still need to worry about copay. So you've payed your yearly dues, payed your devotion fee, and you still have to pay more.

My conservative family loves to tell me how people in countries with universal health care hate it because everything is so expensive or you have to wait in days long lines and so on. They love to tell me they know this because they know someone that knows someone, it always makes me laugh because I happen to work with a large number of people in Canada, England, and Australia. It's true for non emergency things you may wait (note: that is also true in the US) and it's expensive, but neither of those compare to the nightmare of a system we have in the US. Give me those higher taxes and wait times in return for everyone being covered and more ease of finding a Dr and not having to play the deductible game.

So fuck off with my idiot conservative family excuses, it's already expensive with the added layer of also being confusing.

augustusleonus on July 31st, 2023 at 14:19 UTC »

We need both single payer healthcare and a butt ton more of general practice docs to make things really work

999i666 on July 31st, 2023 at 14:02 UTC »

America already has single payer.

America already invested tons of money into said single payer health care program

Investing said money into said program has resulted in its patients glowing about the improvements to said program (I'm one of them)

It's called the VA. And every American should have it. It's nice and all that they want to thank us for our service, and say we're different blah blah yada yada, but we're not talking about disability from war injuries or 10% off at home depot or maybe recognition at a sports game.

We're talking about life and death health care. All of us should have it. Some of us already do. And it wouldn't be hard to make it happen for everybody.

But soulless bastard insurance companies couldn't get rich then, now could they?