Can America’s canals double as solar farms?

Authored by canarymedia.com and submitted by captainquirk
image for Can America’s canals double as solar farms?

Some 8,000 miles of federally owned canals snake across the United States, channeling water to replenish crops, fuel hydropower plants and supply drinking water to rural communities. In the future, these narrow waterways could serve an additional role: as hubs of solar energy generation.

A coalition of environmental groups is urging the federal government to consider carpeting its canals with solar panels. The concept was pioneered in India a decade ago and will soon be tested in California for the first time. Early research suggests that suspending solar arrays over canals can not only generate electricity in land-constrained areas but may also reduce water evaporation in drought-prone regions.

Last week, more than 125 climate advocacy groups, led by the Center for Biological Diversity, sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Interior calling on the agency to deploy solar over its 8,000 miles of canals and aqueducts. The agency’s Bureau of Reclamation owns and operates the infrastructure, often in partnership with local irrigation and water districts.

Subscribe to receive Canary's latest news

Such a move would potentially generate over 25 gigawatts of renewable energy — enough to power nearly 20 million homes — and reduce water evaporation by tens of billions of gallons, according to the letter. To come up with the national numbers, the groups extrapolated from previous research led by the University of California, Merced that analyzed the potential benefits of covering California’s 4,000 miles of canals.

“We’re trying to elevate this as a good solution that you should be doing,” Brett Hartl, the government affairs director at the Center for Biological Diversity, said about the letter. ​“You don’t have to pave over thousands of acres of land…at the expense of lost habitat.”

The solar-canal campaign reflects a broader tension that’s building as the U.S. transitions away from fossil fuels toward cleaner energy sources.

Sprawling utility-scale solar systems are facing pushback in rural Midwestern communities and in Maine, Texas, Virginia and elsewhere. Local opponents have argued that big solar projects would take farmland out of production, reduce property values and possibly harm wildlife. The American Clean Power Association, an industry trade group, has argued that community opposition is making it harder for solar developers to build projects at the rate that’s needed to address climate change.

The Biden administration is pushing to permit 25 gigawatts of solar, wind and geothermal energy projects on public lands by 2025, the bulk of which will likely include utility-scale projects in the western United States. Solar canals could, in theory, provide a way to meet some of those goals without disturbing ecosystems or affecting communities.

“It builds on the conventional wisdom that you’d better build solar over existing infrastructure first before you take natural lands or productive farmland out of use,” said Roger Bales, an engineering professor at UC Merced who specializes in water and climate research. Existing sites can include rooftops, landfills, parking lots and former industrial lands.

For all their promise, solar canals remain more of an idea than a widely deployed reality. But efforts are underway to start installing and testing projects in water-scarce parts of the country.

XT-421 on July 26th, 2023 at 14:57 UTC »

Article does not seem to do a good job defining "canal" and many seem confused here.

There are natural streams and rivers - this is not an acceptable application for that condition. Maintenance and loss of light could (and would), destroy natural ecosystems in "natural" water bodies.

There are irrigation ditches - seems to be (partially) the topic of this article. These are used in farms to help route stormwater runoff (rain flooding) into naturally watering crops. I worry for the vegetation that holds those channels together which may need light to live, but there are plenty of dim-light plants which could hold, and as long as the cleaning of the solar canopy doesn't introduce too much negative Wastewater into the crops, I don't see too much an issue (admittedly, the washing material has me concerned... depending on the frequency that might really be tricky)

There are concrete stormwater channels - these are solely for rain. You see them on the sides of (or underneath) urban areas for transmitting huge volumes of floodwater during freak rain events. These are ideal for solar canopies.

To be clear, there are more nuances, but be keenly aware of the definition of "canal" when you hear news about this. It can have many different meanings!!

Mtnskydancer on July 26th, 2023 at 14:31 UTC »

Canals, yes, rivers, not so much. Sunlight, even when it’s too much, is still necessary.

I could see patches over rivers shaded by solar panels, maybe allowing fish nurseries to thrive.

pickles55 on July 26th, 2023 at 13:44 UTC »

That just makes sense, it's free real estate and covering canals reduces evaporation losses