'Give Me a Goddamn Break': House Democrat Slams Food Aid Cuts as Pentagon Budget Soars

Authored by commondreams.org and submitted by Picture-unrelated

Rep. Jim McGovern, a leading anti-hunger lawmaker in the House, expressed anger Tuesday that the debt ceiling legislation negotiated by Republicans and the Biden administration targets food benefits for older adults while doing nothing to raise taxes on the wealthy or rein in military spending.

During a House Rules Committee hearing on the bill, McGovern (D-Mass.)—the panel's top Democrat—slammed his Republican colleagues for claiming to care about the deficit but refusing to look to the Department of Defense, a paragon of wasteful spending and fraud, for savings. The White House and Republicans ultimately agreed to increase military spending for the coming fiscal year.

Meanwhile, Republicans rejected White House proposals to close tax loopholes exploited by the rich.

Instead, McGovern said Tuesday, the GOP insists Congress has to "cut funding that helps the most vulnerable in this country."

"Give me a goddamn break," he added.

McGovern voiced particular alarm over the bill's expansion of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) work requirements to include adults between the ages of 50 and 54, a Republican demand. Analysts and campaigners say the change, which would sunset in 2030, could put hundreds of thousands of older adults at risk of losing food aid.

White House officials and President Joe Biden himself have defended the new requirements by pointing to the legislation's proposed expansion of SNAP benefits for veterans, kids leaving foster care, and people experiencing housing insecurity.

Speaking to reporters on Sunday, Biden brushed aside progressives' warnings that the bill could cause some people to go hungry, calling such concerns "ridiculous."

McGovern pushed back during Tuesday's hearing, saying that "improving benefits for some does not justify putting 700,000 older adults at risk of losing critical, lifesaving food benefits."

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) published an assessment late Tuesday that concludes the debt ceiling bill, titled the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, would lead to roughly 78,000 people gaining SNAP benefits "in an average month, on net (an increase of about 0.2% in the total number of people receiving SNAP benefits)."

But observers cautioned that the CBO's estimate hinges on ensuring that vulnerable people, particularly those who are homeless, are aware they are exempt from SNAP work requirements and able to navigate the program's bureaucracy.

"This is HIGHLY theoretical," The American Prospect's David Dayen wrote of the CBO analysis. "There's no funding to identify eligible people without benefits or to help them apply or find the necessary documentation. I obviously haven't seen the model but it seems like wishful thinking to me."

"How are we exactly a) informing homeless individuals that 1 of the 2 work requirements for SNAP [has] been lifted, b) helping them collect and submit the documents that prove they meet the income test, and so on?" Dayen asked.

After a nearly six-hour hearing, the Republican-controlled House Rules Committee voted Tuesday to send the debt ceiling legislation to the full House for a vote, which could come as soon as Wednesday evening.

McGovern and every other Democrat on the panel voted no.

Ahead of Tuesday's committee vote, McGovern called the latest standoff over the debt ceiling an "all-time high in recklessness and stupidity" and said Republicans "manufactured" a "crisis that risks the full faith and credit of the United States."

"Republicans are unfit to govern," said McGovern, one of the lawmakers who—to no avail—urged Biden to use his 14th Amendment authority to unilaterally avert a debt ceiling catastrophe.

"This bill could have been a lot more awful than it is," McGovern added. "I didn't come to Congress to hurt people. And when I listen to my Republican friends, what is clear to me is that we don't share the same values."

SentientCrisis on May 31st, 2023 at 14:07 UTC »

I went through a really rough patch and very suddenly became a single mom of an infant with no job and no car and no family. I qualified for TANF but in order to get it, I had to prove that I was job-hunting.

I had a computer and internet access at home where my baby could be safe and comfortable in familiar surroundings. But the state didn’t trust that I would actually job hunt from home. Instead they wanted to pay for my public transportation to a subsidized childcare facility that smelled like piss before taking public transit to their buildings where I could sit at one of their old, slow computers and do the exact same thing that I could do from home.

I was irate. Being pathetically poor is punishment enough. Don’t make me jump through extra hoops just to give other people a job managing hoop-jumpers.

I’m deeply grateful for TANF. It saw me through a scary chapter. Society needs safety nets and they shouldn’t come with punishments. Needing the safety net is punishment enough.

deltadal on May 31st, 2023 at 13:54 UTC »

There is zero reason, especially with the subsidies we pay farmers, for people in this country to go hungry. It just isn't even reasonable.

cheap90scigar on May 31st, 2023 at 12:00 UTC »

It’s just cold and callous. You must show documentation that you’ve worked 80 hours in a month for about $200 in food benefits.

Meanwhile the Department of Defense has never passed a single audit on their spending and their budget hits record numbers every year.

It’s brazen corruption just sitting out in the open and there’s seemingly nothing Americans can do about it.