Supreme Court won’t block California flavored tobacco ban

Authored by apnews.com and submitted by Travis_Miller
image for Supreme Court won’t block California flavored tobacco ban

FILE - Menthol cigarettes and other tobacco products are displayed at a store in San Francisco on May 17, 2018. The Supreme Court on Monday, Dec. 12, 2022, refused a request from tobacco companies to stop California from enforcing a ban on flavored tobacco products that was overwhelmingly approved by voters in November. R.J. Reynolds and other tobacco companies sought the high court's intervention to keep the ban from taking effect by Dec. 21. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday refused a request from tobacco companies to stop California from enforcing a ban on flavored tobacco products that was overwhelmingly approved by voters in November.

R.J. Reynolds and other tobacco companies sought the high court’s intervention to keep the ban from taking effect by Dec. 21.

There was no additional comment from the justices and no noted dissents.

The ban was first passed by the state legislature two years ago but it never took effect after tobacco companies gathered enough signatures to put it on the ballot. But nearly two-thirds of voters approved of banning the sale of everything from cotton-candy vaping juice to menthol cigarettes.

Supporters of the ban say the law was necessary to put a stop to a staggering rise in teen smoking.

R.J. Reynolds filed a federal lawsuit filed the day after the Nov. 8 vote, but lower courts refused to keep the law on hold while the suit proceeds.

Menthol cigarettes make up about a third of the market in California, the companies said in urging the Supreme Court to keep them from losing so much business in the nation’s largest state.

They argued that the authority to ban flavored products rests with the federal Food and Drug Administration.

California responded that federal law comfortably allows state and local governments to decide which tobacco products are to be sold in their jurisdictions. And the state noted that the companies only went to the Supreme Court after spending “tens of millions of dollars” in a losing cause at the polls.

California will be the second state in the nation, after Massachusetts, to enact a ban prohibiting the sale of all flavored tobacco products. A number of California cities, including Los Angeles and San Diego, have already enacted their own bans, and several states have outlawed flavored vaping products. So far no legal challenges to those bans have prevailed, but the companies have an appeal pending at the high court in their fight with Los Angeles.

It’s already illegal for retailers to sell tobacco to anyone under 21. But advocates of the ban said flavored cigarettes and vaping cartridges were still too easy for teens to obtain. The ban doesn’t make it a crime to possess such products but retailers who sell them could be fined up to $250.

In addition to menthol and other flavored cigarettes, the ban also prohibits the sale of flavored tobacco for vape pens, tank-based systems and chewing tobacco, with exceptions made for hookahs, some cigars and loose-leaf tobacco.

ddr1ver on December 13rd, 2022 at 14:24 UTC »

My 81 year old mother in law is going to go completely postal when she finds out she can’t get her menthol cigarettes.

PathOfDawn on December 13rd, 2022 at 13:43 UTC »

I know how this will end in the vaping world at least. Companies in vape stores will no longer sell flavored juice, but they will sell two separate things, one which is completely unflavored nicotine juice, and the other will be advertised as a "flavor booster" but will specifically be marketed towards other things, like water flavoring or whatever. There will be very specific language that you cannot mention it in the store in the context of mixing it together, but it'll be generally understood by the community that's what you do with it. Then you just mix it at your house, and boom, vapers can still have their cotton candy flavored vape juice, and the stores can remain compliant with state law.

I've already seen something similar to this happen in my local shop in small town Texas after the FDA was considering it's own ban. I don't know how that shaked out because I moved away, but that was the system the store was using to get around it all.

AshamedDeparture on December 13rd, 2022 at 13:37 UTC »

Anyone else wondering what California flavor tastes like when they first read this?