Starbucks workers strike at more than 100 US stores

Authored by apnews.com and submitted by davetowers646
image for Starbucks workers strike at more than 100 US stores

People chant and hold signs in front of a Starbucks in New York, Thursday, Nov. 17, 2022. Starbucks workers at more than 100 U.S. stores say they're going on strike Thursday in what would be the largest labor action since a campaign to unionize the company's stores began late last year. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

Starbucks workers at more than 100 U.S. stores are on strike Thursday in their largest labor action since a campaign to unionize the company’s stores began late last year.

The walkouts coincide with Starbucks’ annual Red Cup Day, when the company gives free reusable cups to customers who order a holiday drink. Workers say it’s often one of the busiest days of the year. Starbucks declined to say how many red cups it plans to distribute.

Workers say they’re seeking better pay, more consistent schedules and higher staffing levels in busy stores. Stores in 25 states planned to take part in the labor action, according to Starbucks Workers United, the group organizing the effort. Strikers are handing out their own red cups with union logos.

Starbucks, which opposes the unionization effort, said it is aware of the walkouts and respects its employees’ right to lawfully protest. The Seattle company noted that the protests are happening at a small number of its 9,000 company-run U.S. locations.

“We remain committed to all partners and will continue to work together, side-by-side, to make Starbucks a company that works for everyone,” the company said Thursday in a statement.

Some workers planned to picket all day while others will do shorter walkouts. The union said the goal is to shut stores down during the strikes, and noted that the company usually has difficulty staffing during Red Cup Day because it’s so busy.

Silvia Baldwin, 26 and Tzvi Ortiz, 31, said they love being baristas at the 34th Street and Chestnut Street Starbucks in Philadelphia. But the work has gotten harder, with the understaffed store trying to fill delivery orders and in-person orders simultaneously.

“It’s just not viable. It’s very stressful,” Ortiz said. “And a lot of people don’t really notice, like, the humans behind this assembly.”

Baldwin, who is on the store’s bargaining committee, is also frustrated that the union hasn’t been able to bargain with Starbucks. Striking on Starbucks’ busiest day felt inspiring and it will “be impossible to ignore,” she said.

Others, including Michelle Eisen, a union organizer at one of the first stores to organize in Buffalo, New York, said workers are angry that Starbucks promised higher pay and benefits to non-union stores. Starbucks says it is following the law and can’t give union stores pay hikes without bargaining.

At a store in Seattle less than three miles from Starbucks’ headquarters, workers said managers were making drinks while baristas picketed outside.

“It’s been almost a year since we told Starbucks that we are unionizing this location and we still have not been able to get them to agree to a time for contract negotiations,” Seattle barista Micah Lakes said. “We’re not going to work the day that is the most important for you if you’re not going to be willing to meet up with us and talk with us about what we need from the company.”

At least 257 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize since late last year, according to the National Labor Relations Board. Fifty-seven stores have held votes where workers opted not to unionize.

Starbucks and the union have begun contract talks at 53 stores, with 13 additional sessions scheduled, Starbucks Workers United said. No agreements have been reached so far.

The process has been contentious. Earlier this week, a regional director with the NLRB filed a request for an injunction against Starbucks in federal court, saying the company violated labor law when it fired a union organizer in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The regional director asked the court to direct Starbucks to reinstate the employee and stop interfering in the unionization campaign nationwide.

It was the fourth time the NLRB has asked a federal court to intervene. In August, a federal judge ruled that Starbucks had to reinstate seven union organizers who were fired in Memphis, Tennessee. A similar case in Buffalo has yet to be decided, while a federal judge ruled against the NLRB in a case in Phoenix.

Meanwhile, Starbucks has asked the NLRB to temporarily suspend all union elections at its U.S. stores, citing allegations from a board employee that regional officials improperly coordinated with union organizers. A decision in that case is pending.

AP Writer Nardos Haile contributed from New York. AP Video Journalist Manuel Valdes in Seattle contributed from Seattle.

GalacticGoku on November 17th, 2022 at 20:48 UTC »

Here’s the thing. In Washington state you cannot work full time at Starbucks until you are a shift lead. If you don’t get that promotion you are stuck at part time forever. Some people get a promotion within a few months, some don’t get one for a couple years. The main deciding factor is if you are with corporate or not. Managers and shift leads must comply with corporate rules or risk being fired or demoted.

Since all the partners (fancy term for baristas to get around the fact that all partners are literally just part time folks) cannot get full time wages, they are consistently taking up shifts as soon as they hear someone cannot come into work.

My roommate was a Starbucks partner for 9 months and watched their entire savings dwindle away despite numerous discussions with their manager about not being able to pay bills and needing more hours. More hours were promised, but then the store hired two more people. My roommate checked up every day on their days off to see if they could pick up a shift, some days they were successful and were out the door within 10 minutes, other days someone else beat them to it.

One time while my roommate was sick, they were trying to report their symptoms to their manager, who just wiped all their shifts for an entire week, and went on vacation without responding to any messages. My roommate was out a week’s wages with no notice. They had a minor cold.

After an intense budgeting night with them (my mom is a banker so this knowledge is easy for my to teach my YA friends) we figured out that Starbucks was quite literally not profitable to a person who needs to pay bills and rent. And after counting through their paystubs we found that every time they had asked for more hours they actually received less or got cut from shifts for seemingly no reason.

Leadership at Starbucks is a joke. The only ones looking out for each other are the partners and occasionally the shift leads because they have recent experience being a partner.

Starbucks is a fast food chain. Most coffee shops or drive up huts don’t even count Starbucks experience as genuine café experience because the machinery used is patented to Starbucks, and they would rather teach someone who doesn’t know anything about coffee brewing. At least that was my roommates experience when they quit and tried to seek out employment at other coffee shops.

Starbucks hires people on with hopes and promises of career advancement but all they did was put my roommate in financial risk.

Edit: typos

Oh4faqsake on November 17th, 2022 at 19:53 UTC »

Can Starbucks afford to pay a living wage?

In 2021 they had a net profit of 4.2 billion.

Pay your people.

1968camaro on November 17th, 2022 at 19:19 UTC »

Shit pay and no benefits... AWWWWWW people can't get coffeeee!!!!

Good for the employees...