Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and other Democrats want to pay retirees an additional $2,400 in their Social Security checks — by raising taxes on the richest Americans

Authored by businessinsider.com and submitted by Sweep145
image for Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and other Democrats want to pay retirees an additional $2,400 in their Social Security checks — by raising taxes on the richest Americans

Sanders and Warren rolled out a plan to boost Social Security checks.

But Republicans slammed the proposal's tax hikes to finance the larger benefits to retirees.

The GOP generally favors other steps to preserve Social Security, like raising the retirement age.

Sign up for our weekday newsletter, packed with original analysis, news, and trends — delivered right to your inbox. Loading Something is loading. Email address By clicking ‘Sign up’, you agree to receive marketing emails from Insider as well as other partner offers and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

There's a Social Security benefits cliff looming, with retirees seeing their checks garnished as soon as 2035.

According to the latest federal Social Security report, the program has just enough funding to send out monthly checks to elderly and disabled Americans for 13 years. Beyond that, a 20% reduction in benefits is needed for the program to be sustainable.

"In the coming decades it will be vital for Congress to take steps to put Social Security and Medicare on solid financial footing for the long term," Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said in a statement on the Social Security report.

Senator Bernie Sanders — alongside Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and a bevy of other Democrats — are putting forward a plan to change that.

Their proposal: A bill that would increase the benefit by $2,400 per year, and fully fund the program through 2096.

To pay for it, the Democrats are proposing a raise to the earnings cap for paying into Social Security. Right now, Americans are only taxed on their first $147,000 in income to pay for Social Security; earnings beyond that are not touched.

Sanders' Social Security Expansion Act "would lift this cap and subject all income above $250,000 to the Social Security payroll tax," according to a fact sheet released by the senator.

Raising the income threshold isn't a new concept, and it's one that key centrist Joe Manchin has already expressed support for. Earlier this year, the Democrat from West Virginia said that the payroll tax cap should be taken up to $400,000 to put Social Security on a more sustainable fiscal path.

While Sanders' plan is one solution to patching the ailing — and popular — program, Republicans indicated that it wouldn't draw their votes. They tend to resist tax increases to fund more generous safety net benefits, favoring other fixes instead.

Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, the ranking member of the Budget Committee, suggested in a Thursday Congressional hearing that the program's retirement age would probably need to be raised, a step that Sen. Mitt Romney also expressed support for earlier this year. Romney previously proposed the TRUST Act, a bipartisan bill directed at helping fix Social Security and other ailing programs. Critics said that legislation might end up cutting some benefits.

"Senator Sanders makes a wonderful plea, which many, many people agree with — the need for helping our seniors and providing better benefits for them and so forth," Romney, a Republican from Utah, said during the Senate Budget Committee hearing. "But recognize this bill has no chance whatsoever of receiving a single Republican vote in either house."

Saber_Rattler34 on June 9th, 2022 at 21:53 UTC »

I’m 43, how about we secure the program so GenX doesn’t become the first generation to not get benefits…been paying into it over 20 years now!

sillyandstrange on June 9th, 2022 at 19:57 UTC »

My parents are only able to afford our house because I moved back home and started paying half.

Hurts to watch my dad fear about spending more than 10 bucks on something.

standupsitback on June 9th, 2022 at 19:54 UTC »

Why is there a cap on social security tax? It's not even properly funded. Has it always been this way?