Austin pushing to effectively decriminalize abortion ahead of ruling on Roe

Authored by politico.com and submitted by CobaltEmu
image for Austin pushing to effectively decriminalize abortion ahead of ruling on Roe

The state’s so-called trigger law, which would take effect 30 days after a Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe, includes the nation’s harshest criminal penalties on abortion and language vague enough that abortion-rights proponents believe it will not only be used to go after abortion providers but also criminalize people who end their own pregnancies with abortion pills. Last month, 26-year-old Lizelle Herrera was arrested and charged with murder in Rio Grande City, Texas after allegedly self-inducing an abortion, even though abortion is not currently a criminal offense in Texas.

The trigger law will make performing, inducing or attempting an abortion where “an unborn child dies as a result of the offense” a first-degree felony, punishable by up to life in prison and up to a $10,000 fine. It contains an exception only to save the life of the pregnant person.

The new resolution doesn’t explicitly decriminalize abortion but rather directs police to make it their lowest enforcement priority in an effort to skirt conflict with state law, Vela said. But it highlights the tension between red state and the blue cities, where a new front in the battle over abortion rights is opening as the Supreme Court prepares to issue a decision on Roe in the coming weeks.

A city of Austin spokesperson said in a statement that “the city is prepared to take the steps necessary to implement this resolution upon passage by City Council.” The council passed a similar measure in 2020 that effectively decriminalized marijuana by ending arrests and fines for low-level possession, which the police department has followed.

Vela said he is having “ongoing conversations” with Austin Police Chief Joseph Chacon about the proposal and hopes the department will comply with the directive. A department spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.

“The police do not want to be in the middle of this controversy. The police right now in Austin are struggling with staffing,” Vela said. “I don’t think the police want to dedicate resources to these types of, what I would call, ‘political crimes.’”

A spokesperson for state Attorney General Ken Paxton did not respond to a request for comment. Paxton, a Republican, has been at the vanguard of restricting abortion access in Texas, which has been in the spotlight since the state’s six-week abortion ban, enforced through a private right of action, took effect in September 2021.

Austin’s proposal, which aims to protect both patients and providers, comes as an extension of the city’s efforts to preserve abortion access despite the state’s restrictions. The city has, for instance, provided logistical support for abortion access, including transportation, lodging and child care, since 2019 — a model St. Louis is now looking to replicate.

More cities in Texas could be next. Julie Oliver, executive director of Ground Game Texas, a group that pushes for progressive, local ballot measures, said they are looking at pushing similar measures in San Antonio, Houston and Dallas. If that isn’t successful, the group plans to turn to the local ballot initiative process.

“Home rule charter cities have a tremendous amount of leeway and self-governance, and part of that is deciding which laws you’re going to prioritize,” Oliver said. “And so, because you have a finite number of resources in a finite budget, cities are constantly deciding which laws they’re going to enforce and which ones they are not.”

Local officials who support abortion rights in states where access is in jeopardy may also have an important role to play, said Greer Donley, a professor specializing in reproductive health care at the University of Pittsburgh Law School.

For instance, Radnor Township in Pennsylvania, where abortion is likely to remain legal because Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf has promised to veto any Republican-passed bans, recently approved an ordinance protecting abortion rights.

“We live in a state where abortion is going to remain legal in the short term, at least after Roe goes down. But that’s because our legislature’s totally divided. We currently have a Democratic governor, but our legislature’s red, so they wouldn’t be able to pass anything,” Donley said. “When you’re in a purple state, cities might have an interesting role to play.”

72517g on May 31st, 2022 at 06:30 UTC »

Thats great and all, but bans like that in TX have historically been struck down by the state legislature. Denton voted to ban fracking around 2010, so one of the oil/gas lobbyists went down to Austin and got the legislature to ban all bans on franking across the state.

Same thing happened when cities started using their brains and banned 1-use bags at grocery stores. Laredo was saving ~$250,000 per year on water cleanup because plastic bags weren't clogging uo the whole system anymore. Abbott and the legislature got tired of bringing a reusable bag or being charged a couple cents for a paper bag and banned all bans on single use plastic bags.

I see this mostly as a way for the City Council and mayor to get press and recognition to help boost their careers to make effective change at the state level, which has been so desperately needed for a long time in TX.

I'm really hoping that this can be used to unite democrats in TX and lead to change. If there ever was a year for a blue wave, this has to be it!

chris5129 on May 31st, 2022 at 05:56 UTC »

Does this mean I would have to drive my friend to Austin to get an abortion?

evildwarf on May 31st, 2022 at 04:07 UTC »

Good Americans working to help others. Things like this give hope that some people still care.