UN calls reproductive rights ‘foundation’ of equality for women and girls

Authored by thehill.com and submitted by Picture-unrelated
image for UN calls reproductive rights ‘foundation’ of equality for women and girls

The United Nations (U.N.) secretary-general believes that women’s rights are “fundamental” to pursuing gender equality, according to a spokesman who was speaking about the U.N. chief’s response to the possible overturning of Roe v. Wade.

When asked for a response to the news from the high court, Farhan Haq, a spokesman for U.N. Secretary‑General António Guterres, refused to “speculate what will happen” in regard to the overturning of the landmark Supreme Court case. He did, however, say that the U.N. chief believes that sexual and reproductive health and rights are “foundational” to women’s equality and empowerment.

“The secretary‑general has long believed that sexual and reproductive health and rights are the foundation for lives of choice, empowerment and equality for the world’s women and girls,” Haq said at a press briefing, adding that “without the full participation of 50 percent of its population, the world would be the biggest loser.”

The spokesman added that Guterres has repeatedly noted “a global push‑back” on women’s rights, saying it was “essential” to keep pursuing the matter.

The remarks came after a Supreme Court draft opinion was leaked on Monday night indicating that the court was poised to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 Supreme Court case that established the right to an abortion.

The 67-page initial draft majority opinion was written by Justice Samuel Alito and published by Politico on Monday.

It came in response to a case the court was considering regarding a ban in Mississippi on virtually all abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

TheArcticFox444 on May 4th, 2022 at 16:09 UTC »

UN calls reproductive rights ‘foundation’ of equality for women and girls

People have forgotten that Roe v Wade isn't really about abortion.

Prior to Roe, the State (government) had the legal say over what an individual could and could not do with their own body. This was granted to the State by default...IOW, it had never been challenged in the court. (The sad tragedy of Roe was that the case that came to court was an abortion case.)

When Roe v Wade passed, it set a precedent that the individual had the right to choose what could and could not be done to their body.

If Roe is overturned, that right will revert to the State.

Food for thought: China established a one-child policy. If China had the equivalent of Roe v Wade, that policy could not have been put in effect.

Pro lifers should be careful what they wish for...

SuperSimpleSam on May 4th, 2022 at 12:12 UTC »

So since the year 2000, how many countries have passed laws restricting abortions? What kind of company is the US with?

FilthyMonkeyPerson on May 4th, 2022 at 08:39 UTC »

And they are absolutely right. Republicans hate women.