Harris Tells GOP To ‘Stop Pushing The False Choice’ Between Gun Ownership And Reform

Authored by talkingpointsmemo.com and submitted by 2_Sheds_Jackson
image for Harris Tells GOP To ‘Stop Pushing The False Choice’ Between Gun Ownership And Reform

Vice President Kamala Harris on Wednesday morning slammed GOP lawmakers’ fearmongering over efforts to curb gun violence through reforms on firearm purchases.

During an interview on CBS “This Morning,” Harris asserted that after the series of shootings in the Atlanta area in Georgia and in Boulder, Colorado last week and this week that left 18 people dead, the notion of tighter background checks shouldn’t be a divisive issue.

“I believe it is possible–it has to be possible–that people agree that these slaughters have to stop,” the vice president said.

Harris pushed back against the right-wing narrative of a controlling government that seeks to strip people of their firearms.

“Stop pushing the false choice that this means everybody’s trying to come after your guns,” she said. “That is not what we’re talking about.”

Several GOP lawmakers have been wringing their hands over legislation aiming to expand background checks, particularly in recent days following the shootings.

Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) told CNN the day after the Boulder attack that those massacres are “used” as “an excuse to further erode Second Amendment rights.”

“I now believe that their ultimate goal is to abolish our rights,” she said.

During the Senate Judiciary Committee’s hearing on gun violence on Tuesday, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) tried to compare gun control to imaginary laws on impaired driving that ban sober drivers.

“I’m not trying to perfectly equate these two, but we have a lot of drunk drivers in America that kill a lot of people. We ought to combat that too,” he said. “But I think what a lot of people on my side are saying is we ought not to get rid of all the sober drivers.”

On the other hand, a handful of Republicans such as Sens. Pat Toomey (R-PA) and John Cornyn (R-TX) have expressed support for some form of expansion on background checks, though they’ve rejected the robust measures in the House’s legislation that passed recently.

mymeatpuppets on March 24th, 2021 at 16:21 UTC »

Remember when Beto O'rourke said "You're damn right we're coming for your guns!" during the presidential primaries?

I screamed at the television SHUT UP YOU STUPID ASSHOLE. I knew then he would never hold an elected office in Texas ever again.

Edit: Now I understand "rip my inbox"!

whyneedaname77 on March 24th, 2021 at 14:34 UTC »

Serious question that I don't know the answer to and curious about others views.

I am for background checks. It just seems like a no brainer. That said if you run a background check that check would or wouldn't tell you if someone is trying to get help with mental issues? Could they go that far that they are seeking mental healthcare? Or would that be a violation of doctor patient confidentiality? What would or should the background checks check?

Darkzed1 on March 24th, 2021 at 14:14 UTC »

It's one of their one voter issues in a lot of states, they will not stop pushing it since it is the only reason some of them got elected.

People are stupid.