Feinstein proposes withholding COVID-19 relief from states without mask mandates

Authored by thehill.com and submitted by DaFunkJunkie
image for Feinstein proposes withholding COVID-19 relief from states without mask mandates

Sen. Dianne Feinstein Dianne Emiel FeinsteinFeinstein proposes withholding COVID-19 relief from states without mask mandates Graham says he will call Mueller to testify before Senate panel about Russia probe Data shows seven Senate Democrats have majority non-white staffs MORE (D-Calif.) called on the Senate on Thursday to support an amendment to the next coronavirus relief bill that would bar states that do not implement mask mandates from receiving stimulus funding.

In a statement from the senator's office, Feinstein announced her intention to introduce the amendment and stated that it was time for Congress to step in and force states to implement such mandates to stop the virus from spreading.

“Wearing masks in public should be mandatory. Period. [Senate Majority] Leader [Mitch] McConnell [R-Ky.] said the Senate will take up the next coronavirus economic relief bill later this month. At that time, I intend to offer an amendment to prohibit sending funds to states that haven’t adopted a statewide mask requirement," said Feinstein, a member of the Senate Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration.

“My hope has been that other governors would show the leadership to institute their own mask mandates, but so far that hasn’t happened. It’s time for Congress to step in. This is a matter of life or death, and partisan politics shouldn’t play a role," she continued.

Feinstein's statement comes as some governors including Georgia's Brian Kemp (R) and South Dakota's Kristi Noem Kristi Lynn NoemFeinstein proposes withholding COVID-19 relief from states without mask mandates The Hill's Coronavirus Report: Teachers' union President Randi Weingarten calls Trump administration plan to reopen schools 'a train wreck'; US surpasses 3 million COVID-19 cases Oglala Sioux Tribe temporarily locks down South Dakota reservation to fight coronavirus MORE (R) have resisted implementing mask mandates, while Kemp has also taken steps to punish or block local officials who implement such mandates.

Those governors' efforts fly in the face of federal health officials' advice, including that from Surgeon General Jerome Adams who said Sunday that the U.S. could reverse its upward trend of new coronavirus cases were more Americans to "do their part," including wearing masks in public.

“Just as we've seen cases skyrocket, we can turn this thing around in two to three weeks if we can get a critical mass of people wearing face coverings, practicing at least six feet of social distancing, doing the things that we know are effective,” he said on CBS's "Face the Nation." “And it’s important for the American people to understand when we’re talking about the fall, we have the ability to turn this around very quickly if people will do the right thing.”

LadyStarbuck1 on July 17th, 2020 at 01:25 UTC »

This would kill Wisconsin. The legislature and Supreme Court screwed us. The governor is working hard promoting masks, but he can’t actually mandate masks statewide. Dane and Milwaukee counties have mandates, but not the whole state.

Without the federal aid, it’d be so difficult to continue the testing that has been so successful.

This is a great idea in theory. It’d be devastating in practice.

hunter15991 on July 17th, 2020 at 00:28 UTC »

I know this'd probably get Ducey to accept the scientific necessity, but I'm not exactly excited to see what happens to my state if he decides not too.

theoldcap on July 16th, 2020 at 23:36 UTC »

I hate the fact that states won't have mandates but holding off funding hurts the most vulnerable first. I really want her to find another way to do this. I hope there's another way to do this.