Ronald Konopaski, 86, cited outside Planned Parenthood for allegedly failing to shelter in place
The first person cited by San Francisco police for allegedly violating the public health order requiring residents to stay at home is an 86-year-old anti-abortion advocate.
Ronald Konopaski was protesting outside the Planned Parenthood clinic at 1650 Valencia St. near Bernal Heights when police cited him for a misdemeanor Thursday.
Sgt. Michael Andraychak, a police spokesperson, confirmed the citation Friday and said that officers had previously admonished Konopaski for allegedly violating the order.
Andraychak said Konopaski was distributing leaflets on the sidewalk when police warned him Wednesday, and had a chair next to him when police cited him the next day.
Konopaski is the first and only person who the San Francisco Police Department has cited for a violation of the order as of late Friday afternoon, according to Andraychak.
Until Thursday, Police Chief Bill Scott had directed his officers to focus on educating the public to remain indoors during the coronavirus pandemic.
But as of Friday, Scott said officers would begin citing residents and business owners for violating the order after one warning.
“I’ll make this very clear, particularly for the business owners in our city,” Scott said at a noon press conference. “If we have to go back, we are not going to ask twice.”
In a phone call Friday evening, Konopaski said he was pacing back and forth in prayer when police cited him.
He had been at the clinic nearly every day since late February as part of a 40 Days for Life campaign to end abortion.
He confirmed that police admonished him a day before the citation, but argued that the order violated his constitutional right to free speech and religion.
“The people who are opposing my being there are just using this order as a tool to engage the police to do their dirty work to get rid of me,” Konopaski said.
While he does not call it protesting, Konopaski said he has regularly set up outside the clinic for the last decade or so to pray for its closure and offer women “other options.”
He argued that what he does is an “essential service” that should be allowed under the order, and said that he remains six feet away from others.
“I’m 86 years old and I know how to take care of my health,” he said. “I’m following the order of this health thing even though I think that is a gross overkill or overreach.”
In an email, neighbor Bryan Spearry said he is one of the people who have repeatedly called 311 on protesters outside the clinic during the crisis.
“What they are doing right now is NOT essential,” Spearry wrote. “That they are standing so close to everyone walking down that sidewalk, especially right next to a hospital and next to a [Burger King] that accepts EBT, I was concerned.”
A photo of police talking with protesters outside the Planned Parenthood clinic (Courtesy Bryan Spearry)
Matthew Prewett is another anti-abortion advocate who was at the clinic when police cited Konopaski.
“They said that being on the sidewalk would be an issue if anybody else passed because they would have to come within six feet of us,” Prewett said.
Prewett captured the encounter on video posted to social media. He was there with Pro-Life San Francisco founder Terrisa Bukovinac.
Prewett argued that police had selectively chosen to cite Konopaski.
“I see people violating the stay away order all the time in the Panhandle park and I have never seen police respond to that,” he said.
Outside of Planned Parenthood where they are trying to shut down pro-life activists. https://t.co/CQUOP9n8yg — Matthew Prewett (@matthewprewett) April 2, 2020
The order prohibits people from being outdoors except for essential reasons such as grocery shopping or picking up medicine.
It also includes exemptions for certain workers as well as homeless people.
Konopaski is due in court April 27, he said. The fine he faces is expected to be determined by a judge.
He said he does not plan to return to the Planned Parenthood soon, since police threatened to arrest him if he does.
This story has been updated to include additional information.
If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Hrmpfreally on April 6th, 2020 at 10:33 UTC »
This reminds me of my mother.
She’s a pastor- but since 2018, her church has been online.
Now that there’s a global pandemic and we’ve been given instruction to shelter in place, my mother has decidedly taken this as an assault on her freedoms.
Last Friday she got in to a yelling match with the Sheriff in a small town that she used to preach in because she was trying to organize a prayer vigil in the church parking lot and was told no because of the amount of people. I asked her why she thought that was appropriate and she told me that I was a scared idiot if I thought that people sitting in their cars listening to a pastor shout at them via loudspeaker was a threat to them, because I was just as exposed at home.
She’s my mom, and I love her, but that’s very clearly a desperate attempt for attention. She wants everybody to see her as some sort of a rebel, or a true American for standing up for her “inalienable rights,” when, in reality, she’s just selfishly and needlessly exposing herself and others to a very serious virus. She’s an idiot.
I told her about the Pastor in Tampa that got arrested and she asked me how I would feel if that was her- I just asked her how she would feel if she found out law enforcement told her kid one thing and they purposefully did the exact opposite, and she just went quiet.
These people don’t think about anything but themselves.
MIAxPaperPlanes on April 6th, 2020 at 08:13 UTC »
Aside from the other dumb points about this - what the fuck is the point of doing any kind of protest at the moment? Everyone’s in lockdown, no one will see it.
Awaythrewn on April 6th, 2020 at 05:28 UTC »
Eh, bad cause bad execution. Gave fair warning too, doesn't sound heavy handed.