Bernie Sanders unveils plan to boost broadband access, break up internet and cable titans

Authored by cnbc.com and submitted by EssoEssex

Bernie Sanders unveiled a plan Friday to expand broadband internet access as part of a push to boost the economy and reduce corporate power over Americans.

In his sprawling "High-Speed Internet for All" proposal, the Vermont senator and Democratic presidential candidate calls to treat internet like a public utility. His campaign argues that the internet should not be a "price gouging profit machine" for companies such as Comcast, AT&T and Verizon.

Sanders' plan would create $150 billion in grants and aid for local and state governments to build publicly owned broadband networks as part of the Green New Deal infrastructure initiative. The total would mark a massive increase over current funding for broadband development initiatives. The proposal would also break up what the campaign calls "internet service provider and cable monopolies," stop service providers from offering content and end what it calls "anticompetitive mergers."

Sanders and his rivals for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination have pushed to boost high-speed internet access for rural and low-income Americans, saying it has become a necessity to succeed in school and business. The self-proclaimed democratic socialist has unveiled numerous plans to root out corporate influence as he runs near the top of a jammed primary field.

MarkusRight on December 6th, 2019 at 15:36 UTC »

Ive been stuck with one ISP for 15 years now, I have a permanent home in a rural area, We have one ISP with the fastest speeds being 10Mbps. And of course suddenlink cant put their lines down where we live due to windstream owning the lines. Suddenlink BTW could give us 400Mbps if we had them. We currently pay $130 a month for the most bare basic phone + 10Mbps internet, We have no cable, nothing else in our package from Windstream.

What pisses me off to no end is that my friend who lives in town gets 1000Mbps speeds and he pays $75 a month for his. Why the fuck do we pay more for speeds hundreds of times slower!?!?!

HarringtonMAH11 on December 6th, 2019 at 15:22 UTC »

As my FIL says "No, we cant regulate ISPs, they built the infrastructure, so they should choose how it's used. We dont need government involvement anything they put thier hands in they ruin." While he pays $130 and complains to me in other conversations that it's too slow for the money. 🤷🏻‍♂️

ArcaneChaos1 on December 6th, 2019 at 15:08 UTC »

It would be nice to have a choice in internet providers. Right now there's no real competition.