Premier League clubs 'should pay real living wage' to staff

Authored by bbc.co.uk and submitted by BobbyColgate
image for Premier League clubs 'should pay real living wage' to staff

Premier League clubs have been urged to pay all staff above the minimum wage after spending £1.41bn on players.

Many cleaners, security guards, caterers and other staff do not earn enough money to cover the cost of living, the charity Citizens UK said.

It said only four out of 20 Premier League clubs are accredited by the Living Wage Foundation.

The clubs who have not signed up have been accused of losing touch with "the lives and struggles of workers".

Companies accredited by the Living Wage Foundation commit to paying all staff and any third-party contract workers the "real living wage" - a voluntary rate of £9 an hour and £10.55 in London that is higher than the statutory UK National Minimum Wage and National Living Wage of £8.21.

Everton, Liverpool, Chelsea and West Ham have all made the pledge - while some football clubs outside the top league, such as Championship side Luton, also pay the voluntary rate.

"I struggle to put food on the table for my family and I often have to have cut-price meals," said a cleaner who works at Manchester United's Old Trafford stadium.

"Considering the amount of money in football, it would be great to see the club paying all their staff a fair and decent wage," he said.

Premier League clubs made a record combined revenue of £4.8bn in the 2017-18 season.

By the end of transfer deadline day on Thursday the top clubs in English football had spent £1.41bn in a summer of signing new players - just short of the £1.43bn record set in 2017.

Citizens UK said a new football season was starting with employees "left on the breadline" which was "not right when clubs are splashing out record fees on players".

Saichander on August 9th, 2019 at 07:11 UTC »

Pathetic by the clubs

Mi20Ru on August 9th, 2019 at 06:56 UTC »

With the amount of money the prem teams get this shouldnt be a problem....

sga1 on August 9th, 2019 at 06:29 UTC »

What gets me about this is the sheer scale of it - 10k/week more for a player doesn't influence the bottom line in any meaningful way, but it's half a million a year that could make a meaningful difference to dozens of people employed by the club.