Cost plunges for capturing carbon dioxide from the air

Authored by sciencemag.org and submitted by Emperor-of-pinguins
image for Cost plunges for capturing carbon dioxide from the air

Cost plunges for capturing carbon dioxide from the air

Pulling carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) from the air and using it to make synthetic fuel seems like the ultimate solution to climate change: Instead of adding ever more CO 2 to the air from fossil fuels, we can simply recycle the same CO 2 molecules over and over. But such technology is expensive—about $600 per ton of CO 2 , by one recent estimate. Now, in a new study, scientists say future chemical plants could drop that cost below $100 per ton—which could make synthetic fuels a reality in places such as California that incentivize low-carbon fuels.

Those numbers are “real progress,” says Chris Field, a climate scientist at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California. That’s because the new study bases its numbers on data and costs from a real pilot facility, whereas others have relied on scientists’ best guesses of how CO 2 capture technologies scale up. “These guys actually have something you can measure,” says Stephen Pacala, an ecologist with Princeton University who is chairing a panel on carbon removal technologies for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Until now, the cost of climate change has been all about projections. Climate scientists say countries will need to drop CO 2 emissions to near zero by midcentury and then remove more CO 2 than they emit, if the planet is to avoid a catastrophic 2°C warming. Numerous so-called negative emissions technologies exist, including growing perennial plants and trees to make biofuels, and sequestering carbon in soils. One of the most compelling, known as direct air capture (DAC), uses giant banks of fans to blow air through a solution that contains a CO 2 -capturing chemical. Once purified, the captured CO 2 can be injected underground or used to make commercial products, such as fuels or plastics. But in 2011, a review panel of the American Physical Society found that DAC would likely cost about $600 per ton of captured CO 2 .

That didn’t deter David Keith, a physicist at Harvard University who co-founded a company focused on DAC. In 2015, Carbon Engineering launched its first pilot plant for capturing CO 2 in British Columbia in Canada. After capturing the CO 2 in solution, the plant transfers it into a solid, which when heated releases it in a pure gas stream. The crucial CO 2 -capturing chemical is recycled. After 3 years, Keith and his colleagues had collected enough data to calculate the plant’s efficiency—and project the costs of building a commercial scale plant with the same technology. The results: Their technology can capture CO 2 for between $94 and $232 per ton, they report today in Joule .

The company has also built a pilot operation to turn captured CO 2 into a variety of liquid fuels, including gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel. A renewable energy–powered electrolyzer first splits water into hydrogen (H 2 ) and oxygen. The H 2 is then combined with CO 2 to make liquid hydrocarbons using conventional chemical engineering technology. If the CO 2 is captured at the low end of the cost range, the company says can produce its synthetic fuels for about $1 per liter, says Steve Oldham, Carbon Engineering’s CEO.

AlDente on June 8th, 2019 at 12:10 UTC »

We also need an ocean version of this

monstrinhotron on June 8th, 2019 at 11:48 UTC »

Is it possible to stick one of these plants to the output of factories to make them carbon free? I assume that the higher concentration of CO2 in the exhaust from a factory would make capturing the CO2 easier than sucking it from the air.

lolomfgkthxbai on June 8th, 2019 at 10:12 UTC »

At 100$/ton a carbon tax of 1$ per gallon of gasoline would internalize the cost of CO2 pollution for vehicles. Which also means that there should be a 6$ per gallon tax to offset the costs right now.