Swiss court declares driver an Uber employee

Authored by france24.com and submitted by DoremusJessup
image for Swiss court declares driver an Uber employee

A Swiss court has ruled that a former Uber driver was an employee of the ride-sharing firm, not an independent contractor, in a potentially landmark decision, the driver's lawyer said Monday.

The ruling by the labour court in Lausanne, which has not been made public, is the first of its kind in Switzerland, labour lawyer Remy Wyler told AFP.

Between April 2015 and December 2016 the driver was logged in to the UberPop app for more than 5,600 hours and completed more than 9,000 trips.

UberPop was a version of the application meant for individuals not categorised as professional drivers. It was operated by Dutch-based Uber subsidiary, Rasier Operations B.V..

UberPop was banned in Switzerland in 2017, but UberX, which only uses professional drivers, remains available in the country.

After reportedly receiving a host of bad reviews, the driver received a text message in late December 2016 informing him that his log-in had been revoked, Wyler said.

In his complaint to the labour court, the driver argued that he had been wrongfully terminated from an employment contract without proper notice, a violation of Swiss law, and demanded back-pay for holidays among other benefits.

Rasier, the Uber subsidiary, countered that its agreements establish drivers as independent contractors who only have the right to file grievances with arbitrators in the Netherlands, not labour courts in their home country.

In a ruling delivered to the parties last week, the Lausanne court found that it had the right to hear the case and that the driver, whose identity has not been disclosed, suffered a "termination without just cause," Wyler said.

Rasier has 30 days to appeal.

Wyler said the case could have far-reaching consequences across Switzerland, with all Uber drivers potentially being considered employees entitled to social security protections and proper notice in advance of termination.

Uber has already been hit by a series of scandals over executive misconduct, a toxic work atmosphere and potentially unethical competitive practices.

The company is also poised to go public and preparing to sell 207 million shares, raising up to $10 billion in a US IPO.

bobobo1618 on May 6th, 2019 at 21:23 UTC »

As someone who helped their wife go through the self employment registration process in Switzerland (she's a freelancer and wanted to be classified self employed), this is utterly unsurprising.

Here's a quick reference listing some of the criteria for being self employed (I'd give a more detailed and authoritative source but they're in German, French or Italian).

persons working for and on their own behalf, who are independent in their work and who assume the financial risk are self-employed. Self-employed persons have a company name (sole proprietorship, SA, SARL, etc.), their own infrastructure, draw up invoices in their own name, assume the risk of collection and work out their VAT. They decide on their organization, their method of working and outsourcing work to third parties. They work for more than one client.

Uber drivers satisfy next to none of these criteria.

Dodgy employers want to avoid classifying people as employees because it means they have to pay AHV/IV (equivalent to US social security) and pension contributions.

NY-Angrier on May 6th, 2019 at 19:20 UTC »

Interestingly enough, in their public offering documents, Uber considers the drivers their customers for financial reporting purposes. Lyft does as well.

cdoccroc on May 6th, 2019 at 16:51 UTC »

Uber is gonna get expensive.