City trees can offset neighborhood heat islands, Concordia researcher says

Authored by eurekalert.org and submitted by mvea

The idea of the heat island -- that densely built-up urban areas are considerably hotter than the rural and semi-rural landscapes that surround them -- has been extensively studied and is widely accepted by academics and the public.

But a new study by a Concordia researcher takes a closer look at the phenomenon and what can be done to mitigate it. According to Carly Ziter, an assistant professor of biology in the Faculty of Arts and Science, extensive tree canopy cover in an urban area can dramatically reduce the temperatures of their immediate environs -- enough to make a significant difference even within a few city blocks.

In a new paper published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Ziter argues that there is a non-linear relationship between canopy cover and temperature reduction: when canopy cover reaches a certain threshold, temperatures will begin to drop far more dramatically than they do below that point.

"We found that to get the most cooling, you have to have about 40 per cent canopy cover, and this was strongest around the scale of a city block," she says. "So if your neighbourhood has less than 40 per cent canopy cover, you'll get a little bit of cooling, but not very much. Once you tip over that threshold, you really see large increases in how much you can cool areas off."

She adds that the difference between areas with heavy canopy cover and those that are treeless can be as high as four or five degrees Celsius, even within just a few hundred metres of each other.

The effects of shading contribute to that decrease but are not the only factor.

"Trees transpire," she explains. "They give off water vapour, almost like a little air conditioner."

This transpiration occurs mainly during the day. Her research shows that during nighttime there is a much smaller difference in temperature between areas with significant canopy cover and those without.

To get her readings, Ziter -- at the time completing her PhD at the University of Wisconsin-Madison -- and her colleagues built small, battery-powered mobile weather stations and mounted them on bicycles. They would cycle around the city taking readings every second, translating roughly into every five meters. This data allowed them to do a fine reading of what the temperature was at specific locations throughout the city and compare this to the amount of tree canopy, pavement and built structures present.

Their method gave them enough high-quality, real-time data to allow them to carry out fine-scale studies of the relationship between tree cover, impervious surface cover and temperature.

"By doing this over the course of a summer, we found that temperatures vary just as much within the city itself as they do between the city and the surrounding countryside," she says. "We're not seeing so much of a 'heat island' as a 'heat archipelago.'"

Ziter believes her findings can have an impact on public policy and planning. She says that planting efforts would most effectively reduce temperatures in neighbourhoods that are near the 40 per cent threshold, and that urban authorities need to work to keep what tree canopy already exists.

However, she also notes that the leafiest areas tend to be disproportionately in wealthier neighbourhoods. She would like to see planting distributed more equitably as well as rationally.

Planting trees in lower-income neighbourhoods would not only help lower temperatures, it would also contribute to the physical and mental health of the people living there.

"We know that something as simple as having one nice big tree nearby can have a huge host of benefits on people who live in the city," she says.

"Once you have a certain critical mass of canopy, then each tree becomes more important when it comes to cooling temperatures. That has serious implications for how we design our cities and plan our neighbourhoods."

Read the cited paper: "Scale-dependent interactions between tree canopy cover and impervious surfaces reduce daytime urban heat during summer."

walterthekat on April 27th, 2019 at 04:34 UTC »

Probably buried in comments, but I just wanted to add...

I’m a landscape architect who specializes in sustainable urban design and climate resiliency. I also happened to live in Sacramento for many years which, as others have mentioned, has a truly incredible urban canopy (second most trees per capita of any city in the world, after Paris France if the sources are to be believed! Its 9th according to this study). The environmental and monetary benefits from urban canopy are immense but also really hard to quantify, which can make it hard to justify the expense of installation and maintenance of trees. In a lot of cities, Sacramento included, an alarming number of these trees are nearing the end of their lifespan. Without a clear management plan we may be caught in a scenario where mass die-off takes out a huge chunk of the urban canopy all at once and it will be decades before new trees will grow to replace the benefits of these older giants. Long story short, the time to start replanting trees is right now!

edit to add:

The Treepedia project has more current data about urban canopy, putting Sacramento at 9th among cities surveyed.

tinyflyeyes on April 27th, 2019 at 01:46 UTC »

I think it would be amazing if urban architecture incorporated living plant life more, or even as a standard practice-which I know nothing about, mind! Pie in the sky fantasy here! But whether it was rooftop gardens or "tree tenants" like Hundertwasser proposed, I think either incentivizing or mandating such building practices would be beneficial, not just for heat mitigation, and more obvious health benefits, like cleaner air, but also aesthetics: people are more likely to thrive if they like what they're looking at. Everybody likes trees. That's why there's tree law.

mvea on April 27th, 2019 at 00:34 UTC »

The title of the post is a copy and paste from the title, subtitle, second and fourth paragraphs of the linked academic press release here:

City trees can offset neighborhood heat islands, Concordia researcher says

A new study shows that enough canopy cover can dramatically reduce urban temperatures

According to Carly Ziter, an assistant professor of biology in the Faculty of Arts and Science, extensive tree canopy cover in an urban area can dramatically reduce the temperatures of their immediate environs -- enough to make a significant difference even within a few city blocks.

"We found that to get the most cooling, you have to have about 40 per cent canopy cover, and this was strongest around the scale of a city block," she says. "So if your neighbourhood has less than 40 per cent canopy cover, you'll get a little bit of cooling, but not very much. Once you tip over that threshold, you really see large increases in how much you can cool areas off."

Journal Reference:

Scale-dependent interactions between tree canopy cover and impervious surfaces reduce daytime urban heat during summer

Carly D. Ziter, Eric J. Pedersen, Christopher J. Kucharik, and Monica G. Turner

PNAS April 9, 2019 116 (15) 7575-7580; first published March 25, 2019

Link: https://www.pnas.org/content/116/15/7575

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817561116

Significance

Cities worldwide are experiencing record-breaking summer air temperatures, with serious consequences for people. Increased tree cover is suggested as a climate adaptation strategy, but the amount of tree canopy cover needed to counteract higher temperatures associated with impervious surface cover is not known. We used a bicycle-mounted measurement system to quantify the interaction of canopy cover and impervious surface cover on urban air temperature. Daytime air temperature was substantially reduced with greater canopy cover (≥40%) at the scale of a typical city block (60–90 m), especially on the hottest days. However, reducing impervious surfaces remained important for lowering nighttime temperatures. Results can guide strategies for increasing tree cover to mitigate daytime urban heat and improve residents’ well-being.

Abstract

As cities warm and the need for climate adaptation strategies increases, a more detailed understanding of the cooling effects of land cover across a continuum of spatial scales will be necessary to guide management decisions. We asked how tree canopy cover and impervious surface cover interact to influence daytime and nighttime summer air temperature, and how effects vary with the spatial scale at which land-cover data are analyzed (10-, 30-, 60-, and 90-m radii). A bicycle-mounted measurement system was used to sample air temperature every 5 m along 10 transects (∼7 km length, sampled 3–12 times each) spanning a range of impervious and tree canopy cover (0–100%, each) in a midsized city in the Upper Midwest United States. Variability in daytime air temperature within the urban landscape averaged 3.5 °C (range, 1.1–5.7 °C). Temperature decreased nonlinearly with increasing canopy cover, with the greatest cooling when canopy cover exceeded 40%. The magnitude of daytime cooling also increased with spatial scale and was greatest at the size of a typical city block (60–90 m). Daytime air temperature increased linearly with increasing impervious cover, but the magnitude of warming was less than the cooling associated with increased canopy cover. Variation in nighttime air temperature averaged 2.1 °C (range, 1.2–3.0 °C), and temperature increased with impervious surface. Effects of canopy were limited at night; thus, reduction of impervious surfaces remains critical for reducing nighttime urban heat. Results suggest strategies for managing urban land-cover patterns to enhance resilience of cities to climate warming.