The great transatlantic chocolate divide

Authored by news.bbc.co.uk and submitted by TheGreatPompey

There's speculation the US confectionery giant Hershey plans to bid for Cadbury. But is there a transatlantic sweet tooth divide, and might we end up with more "American-tasting" chocolate? Chocolate maker Cadbury is defending itself against a £10bn hostile takeover bid from the American produce giant Kraft Foods. The British firm has urged shareholders to reject Kraft's bid, and is now in talks with fellow confectioner Hershey, with which it has business links. But why should we care? Brits love chocolate. We munched through £3.5bn worth of the stuff last year. So it is no wonder the prospect of an American takeover of a company considered by many to be our chocolate-maker in chief, is souring taste buds on this side of the Atlantic. People get very patriotic about chocolate

Tim Richardson British contemporary tastes in chocolate date back to the early 1900s. The Cadbury favourite, Dairy Milk, was first produced in 1905 and has remained relatively unchanged ever since. Chocolate, more than most foods, provokes an emotional response and childhood memories make us loyal to brands, says Tim Richardson, author of Sweets: A History of Temptation. As a nation, we hold these loyalties dear, and have a "long and distinguished history with chocolate", says Sarah Jayne Stanes, director of the Academy of Culinary Arts. As a result, Brits have become "snobbish" about their guilty pleasure, says Ms Stanes, and this fostered an intense chocolate patriotism that could be threatened by an American takeover. And for many a loyal British chocoholic the word "Hershey" will set the alarm bells ringing. Grittier Anyone who has performed a chocolate taste test will know that compared with its British counterpart, American chocolate has a distinctly different flavour. To many, Hershey's chocolate has a more bitter, less creamy taste than its British equivalent, and seems to have a grittier texture. It all comes down to what exactly chocolate is. In the UK, chocolate must contain at least 20% cocoa solids. In the US, on the other hand, cocoa solids need only make up 10%. A Cadbury Dairy Milk bar contains 23% cocoa solids, whereas a Hershey bar contains just 11%. US chocolate has 10% cocoa solids Much of Europe would scoff at either definition. The continental preference is for richer, darker chocolate, with a significantly higher cocoa solid count. Many European chocolatiers make chocolate with upwards of 40% cocoa solids, a world away from our elevenses bar from the newsagent. But the cocoa content isn't the only thing which separates British chocolate from its American namesake. The chocolate making process differs from the grinding of the first bean. Though confectioners keep their recipes a firm secret, it is believed that American chocolate typically uses South American beans, whilst British makers favour West African cocoa. There are also variations on the type of powdered milk used, which can impact the flavour. A typical Hershey bar also has more sugar than a bar of Dairy Milk, and, crucially perhaps, its ingredients list contains the additive PGPR, which can act in place of the more expensive cocoa butter. American candy bars are typically cheaper than in Britain, which might go some way to explaining the differences. Pod to palate But with a Hershey takeover of Cadbury a possibility, could the Americans view the UK as a potential market for its own brand of chalky-tasting chocolate? Mr Richardson says sweet-toothed Brits should relax - the likelihood of America dabbling with Britain's tried and trusted confectionery tastes are remote. Another expert, David Jago, of consumer research analysts Mintel, says there may not be much to gain by marketing Hershey in the UK, as "many UK consumers have relatively little idea what US chocolate brands such as Hershey's taste like". Rather, a Hershey takeover could lead the Americans to take advantage of Cadbury's international presence, says Mr Jago. The American trip from pod to palate is altogether different than in the UK. But for now Cadbury remains in British hands, and our chocolate will remain just as we like it.

StumbleUpon What are these? E-mail this to a friend Printable version

maiop on January 2nd, 2019 at 03:04 UTC »

The only part you wanna know:

In the UK, chocolate must contain at least 20% cocoa solids. In the US, on the other hand, cocoa solids need only make up 10%.

Hersey contains 13%

Cognito_Haerviu on January 2nd, 2019 at 00:56 UTC »

And the reason why it’s considered chocolate in the US is that chocolate here is defined by its cocoa butter, not cacao, content. This is also why “white” chocolate exists.

Edit: to those asking, by “exists,” I meant that this is why white chocolate can legally be labeled and advertised as chocolate rather than a confectionary in the US, not why it was invented.

Edit 2: to the many people who have commented just to complain about American chocolate, please keep in mind that our continued consumption of products from companies such as Hershey’s and Mars is due to the fact that many of us have grown up with the taste. Even if it isn’t great, it is nostalgic and easily affordable. There are also plenty of local brands that make much better chocolate and ship throughout the states. I personally recommend Whetstone Chocolates if you ever have the chance to buy it.

Edit 3: Yes, as several users, such as u/snow_big_deal and u/themodgepodge, have pointed out, the legal definition is more complicated. I still maintain that, of the two primary products of cacao bean processing, cocoa solids and cocoa butter, while both are important, the existence of cocoa butter in certain quantities is more of a determining factor in whether a product can be labeled as some form of chocolate in the US, contrary to popular belief.

Edit 4: I'm sorry about all of these. I never expected so many comments. I have realized a potential source of confusion. As the article points out.

In the UK, chocolate must contain at least 20% cocoa solids. In the US, on the other hand, cocoa solids need only make up 10%.

Similar to my original comment, this is incomplete. The quantities in this comparison only apply to milk chocolates. With this in mind, I suppose that my comment isn't entirely relevant to the article, since the article is just a comparison of cocoa solid content. I still believe it to be an interesting fact. Also, to those asking about "chocolate drinks" and similar products, if your comment hasn't already been answered, according to the FDA, they can have "chocolate" as part of their name when:

the consumer has long recognized that this product may be made from cocoa and does not expect it to contain chocolate.

So, since most people understand that "chocolate" drinks, "chocolate" puddings, and such contain cocoa and not actual chocolate, they are are allowed to keep the name.

Lord-Velveeta on January 2nd, 2019 at 00:44 UTC »

Same in Canada... same brand chocolate bars taste very different up in Canada.