Stop adding cancer-causing chemicals to our bacon, experts tell meat industry

Authored by theguardian.com and submitted by EightRoundsRapid
image for Stop adding cancer-causing chemicals to our bacon, experts tell meat industry

The reputation of the meat industry will sink to that of big tobacco unless it removes cancer-causing chemicals from processed products such as bacon and ham, a coalition of experts and politicians warn today.

Led by Professor Chris Elliott, the food scientist who ran the UK government’s investigation into the horse-meat scandal, and Dr Aseem Malhotra, a cardiologist, the coalition claims there is a “consensus of scientific opinion” that the nitrites used to cure meats produce carcinogens called nitrosamines when ingested.

It says there is evidence that consumption of processed meats containing these chemicals results in 6,600 bowel cancer cases every year in the UK – four times the fatalities on British roads – and is campaigning for the issue to be taken as seriously as sugar levels in food.

“Government action to remove nitrites from processed meats should not be far away,” Malhotra said. “Nor can a day of reckoning for those who dispute the incontrovertible facts. The meat industry must act fast, act now – or be condemned to a similar reputational blow to that dealt to tobacco.”

Other coalition members include Labour’s deputy leader, Tom Watson; former shadow environment secretaries Mary Creagh and Kerry McCarthy; the Tory chair of parliament’s cross-party group on food and health, David Amess; the Liberal Democrat vice-chair of Westminster’s cross-party children’s group, Joan Walmsley; nutritionist Dr Chris Gill; the Cancer Fund for Children, and John Procter MEP, who sits on the European parliament’s environment, public health and food safety committee.

In a statement issued today, the coalition warns “that not enough is being done to raise awareness of nitrites in our processed meat and their health risks, in stark contrast to warnings regularly issued regarding sugar and fattening foods”.

In 2015 the World Health Organisation published evidence that linked processed meats to 34,000 cases of colorectal cancer worldwide each year – and identified nitrites and nitrosamines as the likely cause.

Data from 262,195 British women suggested reduced consumption of processed meat could lower the risk of breast cancer

Two studies published this year have also raised concerns. Glasgow University researchers collated data from 262,195 British women that suggested reducing processed meat consumption could cut a woman’s risk of developing breast cancer. And a John Hopkins University School of Medicine in the US study suggested a direct link between nitrites and the onset of mental health problems. Its 10-year analysis of more than 1,000 people found patients taken to hospital with manic episodes were three times more likely to have recently eaten nitrite-cured meat.

The coalition says the meat industry claims nitrites are essential to combat botulism and infection. But Malhotra said Parma ham producers have not used nitrites for 25 years.

Nitrites give cured products such as bacon and ham their attractive pink colour. Some companies are substituting these with natural alternatives. A year ago, Northern Irish company Finnebrogue launched the “first truly nitrite-free bacon”, with fruit and spice extracts. It is stocked by many major supermarkets. Ocado also sells nitrite-free streaky bacon fromNorthamptonshire-based Houghton Hams and a nitrite-free prosciutto from Unearthed.

mcndjxlefnd on December 29th, 2018 at 20:06 UTC »

What's wrong with just using salt to cure meat?

Wakagoshi on December 29th, 2018 at 19:32 UTC »

This is a better article with a lot more information: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-34615621

TLDR - eating two strips of bacon a day increases the risk of colorectal cancer by 18%, but the risk is still fairly small. Much less than smoking cigarettes. However, the risk increases the more you eat.

Hattix on December 29th, 2018 at 19:28 UTC »

The background on this is that nitrites are used to prevent spoilage due to botulism bacteria. In the stomach, nitrites can be converted to nitrosamines, which are faintly carcinogenic.

In the US, bacon without nitrites must be labelled as "Uncured Bacon, No Nitrates or Nitrites added" and bear the statement "Not Preserved, Keep Refrigerated Below 40 °F At All Times". Most juristictions have limits to the maximum amount of nitrites or nitrates.

However, there is an alternative! "Naturally cured" bacon uses celery sap and lactobacillus cultures to cure the bacon. Celery sap contains very high levels of nitrate (as well as a whole cocktail of other chemicals), which the bacteria process into nitrite, which cures the bacon. Bacon prepared this way contains up to four times more nitrite than properly cured bacon. The bacteria also pre-prepare some carcinogenic nitrosamines, just because they can. Properly cured bacon contains zero nitrosamines.

Were bacon prepared with the levels of nitrate in "naturally cured" bacon, it would not meet safety standards. As it is, however, the marketers can hide behind the "natural ingredients" shield they lobbied for for so long: Additive level regulation doesn't apply if the additives are synthesised during production from other ingredients!

I wonder how much of this is from "health conscious" consumers unwittingly doing themselves harm?