USA Poll: 65 to 71% favor human genome editing to prevent blindness, cancer, cystic fibrosis, etc.

Authored by apnorc.org and submitted by rieslingatkos
image for USA Poll: 65 to 71% favor human genome editing to prevent blindness, cancer, cystic fibrosis, etc.

Americans favor the use of gene editing to prevent disease or disabilities, while there is strong opposition to using the technology to change a baby’s physical characteristics, such eye color or intelligence. Support for eradicating disease and disabilities was strong regardless of party identification, education or religious preference. The same holds true for the opposition to altering genes in order to change physical features or capabilities.

Americans hold similar views about the ethics of gene editing. About 6 in 10 consider editing the genes of embryos for the purpose of preventing or reducing the risk of disease to be morally acceptable. Fifty-four percent say using the technology to prevents a non-fatal condition such as blindness as morally acceptable. Two-thirds say it is morally unacceptable to use gene editing to change a baby’s physical features or characteristics.

What about altering an adult’s genetic material without changing the genes of their offspring? The idea of using gene editing technology to prevent or cure a genetic disorder in an adult is supported by 56 percent, opposed by 17 percent, and 27 percent neither favor nor oppose.

While Americans favor using gene editing to deal with physical ailments, there is less support for the use of taxpayer money to finance testing on human embryos to develop the technology. Overall, 48 percent oppose federal funding to test gene editing technology, while 26 percent favor it and 25 percent neither favor nor oppose. Republicans are particularly against using government money for the development of gene editing.

Regardless of support for the technology, there are some concerns about possible ramifications. Fifty-two percent say the unethical use of gene editing is very likely, and 45 percent think it's very likely the technology would have unintended effects on human evolution. Few think it's likely that most people would be able to afford the technology.

Most Americans say it is at least somewhat likely that the development of gene editing technology will lead to further medical advances, eliminate many genetic illnesses, and be adequately tested.

The nationwide poll was conducted December 13-16, 2018 using the AmeriSpeak® Panel, the probability-based panel of NORC at the University of Chicago. Online and telephone interviews using landlines and cell phones were conducted with 1,067 adults. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 4.1 percentage points.

torrentro on December 29th, 2018 at 06:27 UTC »

I was born with severe eczema, if they could isolate the genetic defect that causes this and remove it I would be ecstatic. Perhaps then I would feel ok having children without feeling like I may be ruining their lives.

Jedor on December 29th, 2018 at 05:55 UTC »

As someone with CF, yes please. No one should ever have to be born with this garbage of a disease

As someone dirt hecking broke, no thank you.

I'm glad this technology is being worked on, but I have no faith in humanity that it will be applied for the common good and not for the profit.

Edit: What the flack why'd I get gold(?) for this? Thanks I guess. And to anyone arguing that "Why shouldn't I benefit cause I can afford it" crap, go frock yourself. Your children are not better than others in the world just because you 'worked your ass off to afford it' You know who else works their ass off to afford a better life for their children? Fricking anyone who isn't a garbage person. And you know who shouldn't suffer because their parents are garbage? Fracking everyone.

It is entirely possible to advocate the use of a technology for the benefit of mankind, while keeping the scope of MANKIND and not the select few who can afford it. I repeat, kindly go freck yourself away.

EditEdit: some formatting.

EditEditEdit: Why is this so popular I just wanted to comment on my disease :(

Editx4: Apparently I should not be so crude so I removed a few curse words, apologies for lowering the quality of debate from "Not everyone deserves a healthy life

madmadG on December 29th, 2018 at 05:18 UTC »

No, dammit I want 10/10 vision. I want to be superhuman.