NC GOP candidate owes $34,000 to operative accused of fraud

Authored by businessinsider.com and submitted by tearing-me-apartLisa
image for NC GOP candidate owes $34,000 to operative accused of fraud

Mark Harris, the Republican candidate for the House seat in North Carolina's 9th congressional district, revealed on Thursday night that his campaign owed over $34,000 to a political operative who's been accused of illegally collecting absentee ballots from voters and only sending in those in favor of Harris.

The operative, Leslie McCrae Dowless, was contracted by Red Dome Group, a Charlotte-based consulting group that Harris' campaign hired to help turnout voters in rural Bladen County.

The debt was reported in a Federal Election Commission filing, which described the payment for "reimbursement payment for Bladen absentee, early voting poll workers; reimbursement door to door," first reported on by The New York Times on Friday.

Dowless, court records show, is a convicted felon who has faced jail time for fraud and perjury. He has denied any wrongdoing in this election cycle.

North Carolina's Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement refused to certify Harris' 904-vote win over Democrat Dan McCready, who withdrew his concession on Thursday.

Dallas Woodhouse, executive director of the North Carolina Republican Party, said he would be open to holding a new election as the reports of voter fraud in Bladen County continue to mount. State investigators are currently looking into irregularities concerning absentee ballots, and the Board will hold an evidentiary hearing at some point on December 21 at the latest.

In a statement to INSIDER, Woodhouse said the state's GOP believes the Board of Elections should hold a public hearing and "fully lay out the facts" regarding the fraud accusations.

"If they can show a substantial likelihood it could have changed the race, then we fully would support a new election," he said. "If they hold a public hearing and simply can't determine one way or the other then, we would not oppose a short delay on the question of certification until they have more answers."

Several district residents have described having their absentee ballots collected, also known as "ballot harvesting," which is illegal in North Carolina. Speaking to local news station WSOC 9, a Charlotte ABC affiliate, Cheryl Kinlaw, a woman who said she was paid $100 to pick up the ballots, said she didn't think this was illegal because Dowless "has been doing it for years."

"I feel bad now that I know that it wasn't legal, but I didn't know at the time," she said.

And the numbers are striking. Elections experts have found that while 19% of absentee voters in Bladen County were registered Republicans, 62% of the County's mailed-in ballots were votes for Harris and the GOP.

On Thursday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi warned that the House could refuse to seat Harris if his victory is approved by the state Board.

"Any member-elect can object to the seating and swearing-in of another member-elect. We'll see how that goes," she said.

Mariana Alfaro contributed to this report.

Boddhisatvaa on December 8th, 2018 at 17:59 UTC »

Dallas Woodhouse, executive director of the North Carolina Republican Party, said he would be open to holding a new election as the reports of voter fraud in Bladen County continue to mount.

Election fraud you dumb shit. This isn't on any voter. This is on your candidate and his felon lackey.

"If they can show a substantial likelihood it could have changed the race, then we fully would support a new election,"

Fuck off. You don't feel the need show any substantial likelihood that actual voter fraud has ever swayed an election to pass draconian legislation that suppresses minority voting. But you want it in this case where there is already a preponderance of evidence suggesting that your candidate was party to at least attempting to steal this election.

carpitown on December 8th, 2018 at 16:57 UTC »

The NC Republican party statement makes my head hurt. They acknowledge there to be credible evidence that one of their nominees participated in elections fraud. But they refuse to act unless it could be proved that the perpetrated crimes had altered the results of the election?

They basically are stating their support for a guy who committed fraud.

RocDocRet on December 8th, 2018 at 16:05 UTC »

When you hire somebody to perform a criminal act......who enforces your failure to pay them?????