Yup, a lot of that is true. Same principle with being cheap vs. frugal. If you're cheap, it'll very often cost you more money in the long run because you are re-buying things later on. If you cannot pay for preventative maintenance, it costs us...
“The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money.
Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.
But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.
This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socioeconomic unfairness.”
SteveAAdcock on July 20th, 2018 at 02:47 UTC »
Yup, a lot of that is true. Same principle with being cheap vs. frugal. If you're cheap, it'll very often cost you more money in the long run because you are re-buying things later on. If you cannot pay for preventative maintenance, it costs us...
MyElectricCity on July 20th, 2018 at 03:47 UTC »
“The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money.
Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.
But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.
This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socioeconomic unfairness.”
-Sir Terry Pratchett
OverlordPumpkin on July 20th, 2018 at 04:23 UTC »
Don't have enough money in the bank? Fees! Have a lot of money? Here's more money!
Not all bank types but you get the idea!