Children prefer to read books on paper rather than screens

Authored by theconversation.com and submitted by buzzbookstore
image for Children prefer to read books on paper rather than screens

There is a common perception that children are more likely to read if it is on a device such as an iPad or Kindles. But new research shows that this is not necessarily the case.

In a study of children in Year 4 and 6, those who had regular access to devices with eReading capability (such as Kindles, iPads and mobile phones) did not tend to use their devices for reading - and this was the case even when they were daily book readers.

Research also found that the more devices a child had access to, the less they read in general.

It suggests that providing children with eReading devices can actually inhibit their reading, and that paper books are often still preferred by young people.

These findings match previous research which looked at how teenagers prefer to read. This research found that while some students enjoyed reading books on devices, the majority of students with access to these technologies did not use them regularly for this purpose. Importantly, the most avid book readers did not frequently read books on screens.

Why do we think children prefer to read on screens?

There is a popular assumption that young people prefer to read on screens. This was mainly driven by education writer Marc Prensky who in 2001 coined the term “digital natives”. This term characterises young people as having high digital literacy and a uniform preference for screen-based reading.

But young people do not have a uniform set of skills, and the contention that screens are preferred is not backed up by research.

Despite this, the myth has already had an impact on book resourcing decisions at school and public libraries, both in Australia and in the US, with some libraries choosing to remove all paper books in response to a perceived greater preference for eBooks.

But by doing this, libraries are actually limiting young people’s access to their preferred reading mode, which in turn could have a detrimental impact on how often they choose to read.

Young people are gaining increasing access to devices through school-promoted programs, and parents face aggressive marketing to stay abreast of educational technologies at home.

Schools are motivated to increase device use, with Information and Communication Technology being marked as a general capability to be demonstrated across every subject area in the Australian Curriculum.

The drivers toward screen-based recreational book reading are strong, but they are not well-founded.

Why are students more likely to prefer paper books?

Reading on devices through an application leaves more room to be distracted, allowing the user to switch between applications.

For students who already experience difficulty with attention, the immediate rewards of playing a game may easily outweigh the potentially longer-term benefits of reading.

Digital literacy could also be an issue. In order to use a device to read books, children need to know how to use their devices for the purpose of reading books.

They need to know how to access free reading material legally through applications such as Overdrive or websites such as Project Gutenburg.

Tips for encouraging your child to read

Research shows that reading books is a more effective way to both improve and retain literacy skills, as opposed to simply reading other types of text. Yet international research suggests that young people are reading fewer and fewer books.

While equipping children with devices that have eReading capability is unlikely to encourage them to read, there are a number of strategies, supported by research, that can help encourage children to pick up a book. These include:

freakingfiretrucks on April 16th, 2018 at 14:13 UTC »

I don't care what kids prefer as long as it gets them reading.

Jr0218 on April 16th, 2018 at 13:57 UTC »

I hate how these studies always throw ereaders and tablets into the same mix. No shit a child's going to be more distracted using an iPad when it has a thousand other things to do (most more stimulating than reading) and notifications popping up ever 5 seconds.

While a kindle has mild distractions such as the store, it is much closer to a book and these studies wouldn't be so skewed.

xmagusx on April 16th, 2018 at 13:30 UTC »

A few points:

Article is a year old, and half the links to the cited "research" are now dead or paywalled.

The studies cited did not differentiate between eink and lcd/led screens. Which is a pretty important distinction, considering one emulates reading a book rather well, and the other is like staring into a flashlight.

The studies cited did not differentiate between ereaders and full blown tablets. This is a distinction which I admit becomes more grey every iteration of Moore's Law, but still, it furthers the case that the more appropriate title should have been something more akin to, "Children prefer to read using objects designed for reading rather than multipurpose entertainment devices."

Some of the "research" cited is phrased in such a way that they might have thrown an Xbox into the mix and the reader wouldn't be able to tell the difference between that and a Kindle, since they're both "screens"

And most importantly, people need to stop treating them like they're mutually exclusive. Some kids like paper books? Load them up with dead trees! If they're young enough, sign them up for the Imagination Library. Other kids like to be able to instantly look up the words they haven't seen before or take breaks by jumping down wikipedia rabbit holes while slogging through their assigned reading? Technology has enabled that too.