Ex-Google recruiter: I was fired because I resisted “illegal” diversity efforts

Authored by arstechnica.com and submitted by BurgerUSA
image for Ex-Google recruiter: I was fired because I resisted “illegal” diversity efforts

Further Reading Slack Engineering Director: Google should do “blind assessments” for hiring A former YouTube employee has sued Google—the video site’s parent company—alleging that he was wrongfully terminated from his position after he complained against hiring practices that he claimed were discriminatory against white and Asian men.

The lawsuit, which was filed in late January in San Mateo Superior Court but wasn’t reported in the media until Thursday, comes at a time when many Silicon Valley companies (including Google) are becoming increasingly cognizant of a largely male, white and Asian workforce. Some companies have publicly said that they are trying to rectify this situation by working harder to find candidates who can do the job and who are also traditionally underrepresented minorities.

The civil complaint explains that Arne Wilberg, who is described as a 40-year-old white man by The Wall Street Journal, worked as a recruiter for YouTube for seven years. In his job, Wilberg was tasked with helping to select engineering and tech talent for YouTube and Google.

Further Reading Black members of Congress push for more diversity in Silicon Valley hires According to the lawsuit, Wilberg received high marks for his performance as a recruiter until he began pushing back against Google’s efforts to hire a more diverse workforce in 2017. His manager, Allison Alogna, informed Wilberg and his colleagues that they were to “only accept” a certain rank of engineers (“Level 3”) if they were diverse.

In April of 2017, Google’s Technology Staffing Management team was instructed by Alogna to immediately cancel all Level 3 (0-5 years experience) software engineering interviews with every single applicant who was not either female, Black, or Hispanic and to purge entirely any applications by non-diverse employees from the hiring pipeline. Plaintiff refused to comply with this request.

Further Reading Major investors push Apple execs to be more diverse: “It’s all white men” Wilberg argues that these practices are “illegal and discriminatory,” and, as he continued to resist these practices, he increasingly chafed against his managers and colleagues. Eventually, Wilberg was fired in November 2017.

His lawyer, Daniel Feder, did not immediately respond to Ars’ request for comment.

In a statement, Google said that it would “vigorously defend this lawsuit,” adding that it has a “clear policy to hire candidates based on their merit, not their identity. At the same time, we unapologetically try to find a diverse pool of qualified candidates for open roles, as this helps us hire the best people, improve our culture, and build better products.”

Google did not respond to Ars’ further questions as to how many similar lawsuits involving alleged wrongful termination and discrimination the company has received.

NightlyGravy on March 2nd, 2018 at 16:26 UTC »

I find it tragically hilarious that Google is currently:

Facing a lawsuit for discriminating against men and conservatives: James Damore

Facing a lawsuit for discriminating against women (pay gap issue)

Facing a lawsuit for firing a recruiter for complaining about illegal and discriminatory hiring practices against whites and asians: Arne Wilberg

Facing a lawsuit for firing an engineer for supposedly fighting racism and other forms of bigotry on their internal servers: Tim Chevalier

Facing criticism from their own employees involved in diversity programs for not protecting them enough from external backlash

Facing criticism from their own employees about pervasive sexual harassment.

cinderful on March 2nd, 2018 at 15:20 UTC »

Microsoft made executive bonuses dependent upon diversity stats. You can guess how that’s gonna work out.

Ijustwanttohome on March 2nd, 2018 at 09:57 UTC »

In April of 2017, Google’s Technology Staffing Management team was instructed by Alogna to immediately cancel all Level 3 (0-5 years experience) software engineering interviews with every single applicant who was not either female, Black, or Hispanic and to purge entirely any applications by non-diverse employees from the hiring pipeline. Plaintiff refused to comply with this request.

Okay this shit wasn't on the other article. There is other thread about this and I thought it was just crybabies upsetting for failing the interview. Reading this however paints it in a different light. This is illegal and wrong and is by definition racist.