Bill Gates calls GMOs 'perfectly healthy' — and scientists say he's right

Authored by businessinsider.com and submitted by mvea
image for Bill Gates calls GMOs 'perfectly healthy' — and scientists say he's right

In a Reddit "Ask Me Anything" thread on Tuesday, Bill Gates called genetically modified organisms "perfectly healthy."

Gates also said he saw the breeding technique as an important tool in the fight to end world hunger and malnutrition.

Though it may seem controversial, Gates' stance is in line with that of most scientists who study GMOs.

Bill Gates has a message for those advocating against genetically modified organisms: I'm disappointed.

In a Reddit "Ask Me Anything" thread on Tuesday, Gates said that not only does he view genetically modified foods as "perfectly healthy," but that he sees them as a promising tool in a wider array of resources in the fight to reduce world hunger.

"GMO foods are perfectly healthy and the technique has the possibility to reduce starvation and malnutrition when it is reviewed in the right way," Gates wrote. "I don't stay away from non-GMO foods but it is disappointing that people view it as better."

Gates' view may strike some as controversial, as many people think that genetically modified foods are dangerous.

In recent years, companies have submitted more than 43,000 products to the Non-GMO Project, an organization that certifies products that don't contain genetically modified ingredients. And sales of such products are skyrocketing — today, they represent more than $22 billion in yearly sales, the organization says.

But Gates' stance is in line with that of most scientists who study the topic.

Flickr/Sonny Abesamis Organizations like the National Academy of Sciences, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the European Commission have publicly said genetically modified foods are safe to eat. A large 2013 study on GMOs found no "significant hazards directly connected with the use of genetically engineered crops."

And nearly all the food we eat today has been genetically modified in some way. Dozens of crops, from corn to watermelon, have been selectively bred for thousands of years to give us the traits we find desirable, like large amounts of sweet, edible flesh, or small seeds.

And many other products — some of them life-saving — might not exist without genetically modified ingredients.

Insulin, the medication that people with diabetes depend on to regulate their blood sugar, is made with such ingredients, while the cotton used to make the shirt you're wearing was most likely genetically modified.

Several experts say the "GMO" label does a disservice to the products made with genetically modified ingredients. The process of genetic modification is a breeding method, much like other recent advances in agriculture.

"What are we labeling here, DNA?" Alison Van Eenennaam, a professor of animal genomics at the University of California at Davis, recently told Business Insider. "There's DNA in everything, so good luck with that."

ihml_13 on February 28th, 2018 at 14:11 UTC »

funny, first the AMA on the frontpage then an article about the very same AMA.

ac13332 on February 28th, 2018 at 11:39 UTC »

The whole issue around GM foods is a shocking lack of public understanding (EDIT - not the publics fault, but don't shout about an issue if you haven't got the understanding). A lack of understanding which is preventing progress. If it has a scary name and people don't understand how it works, people fight against it.

One of the problems is that you can broadly categorise two types of genetic modification, but people don't understand that and get scared.

Type 1: selecting the best genes that are already present in the populations gene pool

Type 2: bringing in new genes from outside of the populations gene pool

Both are incredibly safe if conducted within a set of rules. But Type 1 in particular is super safe. Even if you are the most extreme vegan, organic-only, natural-food, type of person... this first type of GM should fit in with your beliefs entirely. It can actually reinforce them as GM can reduce the need for artificial fertilisers and pesticides, using only the natural resources available within that population.

Source: I'm an agricultural scientist.

the_original_Retro on February 28th, 2018 at 10:56 UTC »

The most important line in the article:

Although it may seem controversial, Gates' stance is in line with the majority of scientists who study the topic.

and the detail:

Organizations like the National Academy of Sciences, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the European Commission have publicly proclaimed GMO foods to be safe to eat. A large 2013 study on GMOs found no "significant hazards directly connected with the use of genetically engineered crops."

Real science seriously needs to come back.

It's stunning how much Facebook's ability to spread false-alarms based on nothing resembling the truth has damaged or destroyed so many tools that could help today's world, or detracted from real issues by focusing concentration and attention on shit that's completely made up.

And yet people fall for and share such posts all the time.