YouTube star wins damages in landmark UK 'revenge porn' case

Internet YouTube star wins damages in landmark UK 'revenge porn' case Chrissy Chambers proposes to her new partner after winning civil claim against ex who posted videos online ‘Revenge pornography’: follow Chrissy Chambers’ search for justice Chrissy Chambers (right) with her current partner, Bria Kam. Photograph: Chrissy Chambers/PA

A YouTube celebrity has won unprecedented damages against a man who uploaded “revenge pornography” videos of her to the internet.

Chrissy Chambers, 26, celebrated her landmark victory on the steps of the High Court by proposing to her partner - who immediately said yes and called Chambers “the bravest, most incredible human being that I’ve ever met”.

In the first civil case of its kind to be brought in England and Wales, Chambers sued her former partner for harassment, breach of confidence and misuse of private information, after learning that the Crown Prosecution Service would not bring criminal charges against him.

The terms of the settlement mean the man cannot be named, nor the amount of damages paid to Chambers disclosed, but her lawyers at the firm McAllister Olivarius say the sum is substantial.

Chambers, who is American, is one of the most popular lesbian content creators on YouTube, along with her now fiancé, Bria Kam. The channels they run together have a million subscribers, and their comedy sketches, songs and vlogs have been viewed hundreds of millions of times.

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Chrissy Chambers (right) proposed to her partner, Bria Kam, outside the court on Wednesday. Photograph: Jenny Kleeman

Before she came out as gay, Chambers had a nine-month relationship with a British man when she was 18. On Wednesday, the high court heard that towards the end of their relationship he filmed seven videos of them having sex without her knowledge or informed consent.

Two years after they broke up, and once Chambers had begun her relationship with Kam, he uploaded them to a free porn site. The videos have since been shared on more than 35 different porn sites and seen hundreds of thousands of times.

Although it has been illegal in England since April 2015 to post private sexual images online without consent, the videos of Chambers were uploaded in 2011, meaning the criminal law did not apply. She brought the civil case in March 2016, settling out of court in December 2017.

Chambers’ victory was made public on Wednesday when a statement of the settlement was read in open court.

Speaking outside the court, Chambers said the outcome was a crucial victory in the fight against revenge porn.

US woman pursues ex-boyfriend in landmark UK revenge-porn action Read more

“We have been able to set a legal precedent that should serve as a severe warning to those who seek to extort and harm with revenge porn: you cannot do this with impunity, and you will be held accountable for your actions,” Chambers said. “For anyone who has been living in fear of revenge porn used against you, there has never been a better time to come forward.”

Immediately after making her statement, Chambers got down on one knee and proposed to Kam. “This is the end of a very difficult chapter in our lives. This has taken up four and a half years of our six year relationship, and I don’t want to waste another moment ending this chapter before I start the next one,” Chambers said.

Kam was overwhelmed as she accepted. “This is the bravest, most incredible human being that I’ve ever met,” she told the crowd outside the court. “I can’t be more happy to be beside her.”

Chambers’ victory in the civil courts marks the end of a four-year legal battle. As well as damages, Chambers has won copyright of the videos, so she can pursue any websites that host them, and received an apology from her ex-boyfriend.

Her lawyer, Georgina Calvert-Lee at McAllister Olivarius, said: “Victims of revenge porn always tell us of their humiliation and shame. Their identities have been stolen and distorted and they think they are powerless to do anything about it. Their attackers – those who have violated their trust and posted their images, or copied and shared them, or profited off them – bank on this humiliation and sense of powerlessness.

“Chrissy Chambers’ case shows that victims of revenge porn need feel powerless no more … All they need do is use the law to stop the revenge porn, and the industry that feeds off it, and take back control of their image and their identity.”