Apple has a change of heart and approves an app that finds net neutrality violations

Authored by phonearena.com and submitted by Techie_world

Senate Democrats are frantically searching for the one more vote from the other side of the aisle they need, which would guarantee the passage of a resolution to restore net neutrality . The Trump FCC has repealed net neutrality and the Senate has 30 days left to overrule the FCC's decision. For those unfamiliar with the concept, net neutrality prevents carriers/ISPs from charging more for subscribers to visit certain websites or to favor certain content.Speaking of net neutrality, Apple originally rejected an app that would have allowed users to determine if net neutrality is being violated. Developed by David Coffnes, a researcher at Northeastern University,can detect if certain apps are being throttled by a mobile carrier or an internet service provider. The user first signs an online consent form (Coffnes is collecting data for his research) and clicks on "run test."computes download speeds from seven apps: YouTube, Amazon, NBCSports, Netflix, Skype, Spotify, and Vimeo.A screenshot of the app being run reveals "Differentation" over Verizon's network for YouTube, Netflix and Amazon. That indicates that these apps are being throttled by Big Red. Developer Coffnes says that this is the sort of information that people would like to know. With the data in hand, consumers can opt to switch carriers, or they could complain to the FCC.As we noted, Apple first rejectedwith one App Store reviewer telling Coffnes that the researcher's app "has no direct benefits to the user." But the company had a 180 degree change of heart, and has now approved it for the App Store.source: Motherboard

CaptainBurito on January 19th, 2018 at 04:47 UTC »

The developer is a genius. Now every one on Reddit knows about this app and will download it.

MagicalMonks on January 19th, 2018 at 02:26 UTC »

The app is called Wehe for those of you who don’t want to read the article

Arkazex on January 19th, 2018 at 00:33 UTC »

I thought they initially removed it because they didn't have any evidence that it worked, and once the guy sent them an explanation of how it works they re-approved it.