Comcast Accused (Again) of Billing Fraud

Authored by dslreports.com and submitted by maxwellhill

Comcast Accused (Again) of Billing Fraud

Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson says the state is expanding its $100 million lawsuit against Comcast, first announced back in August of 2016. That lawsuit had already accused Comcast of numerous, rampant deceptive business practices, including misrepresenting the scope of its Service Protection Plans, charging customers improper service call fees, and engaging in improper credit screening practices.

The original lawsuit claims nearly 2 million instances of deceptive behavior impacting half a million Washington state subscribers.

But now Ferguson is amending and expanding that complaint, arguing that his investigators have found that Comcast's deceptive practices go even deeper than what was alleged in the original complaint.

"New evidence makes clear that Comcast’s conduct is even more egregious than we first realized," Ferguson said. "The extent of their deception is shocking, and I will hold them accountable for their treatment of Washington consumers."

The original complaint found that Comcast tricked more than half a million customers into paying $73 million in subscription fees over the last five years for a "near-worthless" Service Protection Plan (SPP) without disclosing its significant limitations.

This plan covers the cost of all service calls, including those related to inside wiring, customer-owned hardware connected to Comcast services, and on-site "education" about products. However, Washington's AG office claims Comcast did not appropriately disclose that the plan does not cover repairs to any “wall-fished” wiring -- wiring inside a wall -- which constitutes the vast majority of wiring inside homes.

The AG office found that 75% of the time, Comcast representatives told customers the plan covered all inside wiring. They also found that Comcast consistently and intentionally charged customers for work that should have been covered by this $5 monthly fee. The amended complaint (pdf) says investigators found that " Comcast may have signed up more than half of all SPP subscribers without their consent," and in numerous instances charged customers for the SPP plan after telling them it was "free ."

The AG's office says it intends to hold Comcast accountable for "tens of thousands of new violations of the Washington state Consumer Protection Act."

The move comes as ISP lobbyists have convinced the government to gut both state and federal oversight of ISPs like Comcast, dramatically reducing the ability to hold them accountable for behavior precisely like this.

hicksford on December 30th, 2017 at 16:27 UTC »

Spectrum is no better. I cancelled them to switch to a local ISP (who has fiber to the home and I have 0 regrets) a couple months ago. The only remaining charge was for equipment, which would be waived upon return. I go to the physical store front, wait 30 minutes, return the modem, and ask 3 times for them to verify there are no further charges. They assured me the $78 equipment fee is gone, and my balance was 0 and I was all good. Finally free. Funny thing is after you cancel they start sending you a ton of promotional mail, but it is all in the same envelopes that bills come in. Lucky I still open all of these, because the next month, I get a bill for $78 for unreturned equipment... So I call and route myself to billing, tell them I already returned that equipment on X specific date, and after no more than 10 seconds of investigation they are like "yep I see it here that you did return it". I was polite with the person on the phone but I was thinking why the fuck is Spectrum trying to re-charge me for unreturned equipment when it obviously shows in their system I've returned it? Pretty shady if you ask me. Then they couldn't just drop the charge and had to open a ticket for whatever internal billing support they had, so I fully anticipate getting another $78 bill next month. We'll see. For the record, the local ISP I switched to, I have experienced 0 bullshit like this, and they have even waived several fees for me just because I asked nicely, and the service has been flawless.

wakestr22 on December 30th, 2017 at 15:47 UTC »

They did this to me. Also signed me up for a contract without my consent. Specifically asked not to have one. Tried to cancel due to moving out of state and got hit with a huge termination fee. Took my devices back to a local store who never returned them in the system and I got charged for the full costs of the devices too.

Edit: just to clarify for those who keep telling me to get a receipt. I got a receipt. I sent it to them when they charged me. They didn't care. Spent hours on the phone with them saying they never received it.

EC_CO on December 30th, 2017 at 15:38 UTC »

how do we stop this constant attack on consumers?? UP THE FINES!! make the fines 10x the actual damages done and this will quickly stop a lot of bullshit. if you don't make them pay, they will keep doing it. let's see: 'I can screw people over for $100million, but only pay $30mill in fines? LETS DO IT!!!' or how about holding them criminally responsible (after all Corporations are Citizens now) - if I go into a Comcast store and steal $100, I'm going to jail. If a Corporation does it they get a fine. Start jailing those motherfuckers and let's see what happens.