What’s The Highest Known Temperature?

Authored by dynastynow.com and submitted by shoespop

In fact, at absolute zero (0 Kelvin, −273°C, or −460°F), all movements from atoms completely stop. You can’t get colder than that. It’s like trying to go south from the South Pole or north from the North Pole; not only won’t it happen, it can’t.

The hottest thing that we know of (and have seen) is actually a lot closer than you might think. It’s right here on Earth at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). When they smash gold particles together, for a split second, the temperature reaches 7.2 trillion degrees Fahrenheit. That’s hotter than a supernova explosion.

Theoretically, yes. The first contender for the hottest temperature is the Planck Temperature, which equals 100 million million million million million degrees, or 1032 K. You just can’t put this kind of temperature into perspective. There’s simply no way to wrap your head around this number. Saying that 1032 K is hot is like saying that the universe takes up some space.

This is as hot as you can get in normal physics because, once it gets any hotter, conventional physics just doesn’t work. Weird things happen. Gravitational force becomes as strong as the three other natural forces (electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces), and they merge together into one unified force. Understanding how this happens is referred to as the “theory of everything”—the holy grail of modern theoretical physics…something that we currently don’t understand.

PM_TITS_FOR_KITTENS on December 28th, 2017 at 15:49 UTC »

Can we make a rule for this sub to ban articles like this with various misinformation and no authors/sources? Honesty it's just toxic and gives views to a crappy website.

Daredust on December 28th, 2017 at 13:06 UTC »

I am really doubting the scientific correctness of this article. First off there's no author and there are no sources declared. Secondly the planck temperature is not 1032 K (it would equal 759 °C which is ridiculous) it is in fact 1.417×1032 K. I didn't bother checking all the numbers but I wouldn't be surprised if they got the rest of them wrong too.

nicknle on December 28th, 2017 at 12:49 UTC »

So if the localized temperature actually higher than would be reached in a neutron star merger or another cataclysmic astronomical event?