Cities With Uber Have Lower Rates Of Ambulance Usage

Authored by npr.org and submitted by mvea
image for Cities With Uber Have Lower Rates Of Ambulance Usage

Cities With Uber Have Lower Rates Of Ambulance Usage

Enlarge this image toggle caption Justin Sullivan/Getty Images Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Many potential emergency room patients are too sick to drive themselves to a hospital. But an ambulance can cost hundreds or thousands of dollars without insurance.

This where a popular ride-sharing app can step in, while also freeing up the ambulances for those who need them most.

With demand for ambulances decreased by available Uber drivers, emergency personnel have been able reach critical patients faster while also applying necessary treatment on the way to the hospital, according to a new economic study from the University of Kansas:

"Given that even a reduction of a few minutes can drastically improve survival rates for serious conditions, this could be associated with a substantial welfare improvement."

The study investigated ambulance rates in 766 U.S. cities from 43 different states. Taking into account the timelines of when Uber entered each city, the researchers found that the app reduced per capita ambulance usage rates by around 7 percent.

"In order to lower health care spending while improving health outcomes, people can use the least-skilled professional who is still qualified," said the paper's author, University of Kansas economist David Slusky. "It's the same in the provider space: you don't need a neurosurgeon to diagnose strep throat."

Researchers often cite costly transportation as a significant barrier to receiving quality healthcare. A study by Samina T. Syed and Lisa K. Sharp, doctors at the Kalamazoo College, suggests that cost-efficient access to a vehicle is consistently associated with increased access to health care.

"We want to find every way possible," Slusky said, "to bend the medical cost curve."

catherbyyy on December 26th, 2017 at 05:57 UTC »

When my dad passed away I received a bill from the local hospital for $2300 I was 18 at the time and had literally no way to pay for that so I just threw it away. Not surprised someone would use a ride sharing app with the they way the American healthcare system works.

EDIT: I misspoke a bit when I said they sent me the bill. I should have clarified that the bill was in his name which I guess means I didn't have to pay it myself.

pandagene on December 26th, 2017 at 05:28 UTC »

I got a bad second degree burn on my hand and had to go to the emergency room. I just called an Uber to take me the 5 blocks to the hospital and overall it was a pretty pleasant experience!

Infernalism on December 26th, 2017 at 03:41 UTC »

Makes sense, it costs THOUSANDS to use an ambulance if you don't have insurance.

Unless you're literally minutes from death, why not use Uber?