New York's vanishing shops and storefronts: 'It's not Amazon, it's rent'

Authored by theguardian.com and submitted by fog_rolls_in
image for New York's vanishing shops and storefronts: 'It's not Amazon, it's rent'

Vacant storefronts are becoming more noticeable in the capital of consumption, as small retailers are being pushed out by wealthy investors

Walk down almost any major New York street – say Fifth Avenue near Trump Tower, or Madison Avenue from midtown to the Upper East Side. Perhaps venture down Canal Street, or into the West Village around Bleecker, and some of the most expensive retail areas in the world are blitzed with vacant storefronts.

The famed Lincoln Plaza Cinemas on the Upper West Side announced earlier this week that it is closing next month. A blow to the city’s cinephiles, certainly, but also a sign of the effects that rapid gentrification, coupled with technological innovation, are having on the city.

Over the past several years, thousands of small retailers have closed, replaced by national chains. When they, too, fail, the stores lie vacant, and landlords, often institutional investors, are unwilling to drop rents.

'For too long, they have generated harm': the fight to remove offensive monuments in New York Read more

A recent survey by New York councilmember Helen Rosenthal found 12% of stores on one stretch of the Upper West Side is unoccupied and ‘for lease’. The picture is repeated nationally. In October, the US surpassed the previous record for store closings, set after the 2008 financial crisis.

The common refrain is that the devastation is the product of a profound shift in consumption to online, with Amazon frequently identified as the leading culprit. But this is maybe an over-simplification.

“It’s not Amazon, it’s rent,” says Jeremiah Moss, author of the website and book Vanishing New York. “Over the decades, small businesses weathered the New York of the 70s with it near-bankruptcy and high crime. Businesses could survive the internet, but they need a reasonable rent to do that.”

Part of the problem is the changing make-up of New York landlords. Many are no longer mom-and-pop operations, but institutional investors and hedge funds that are unwilling to drop rents to match retail conditions. “They are running small businesses out of the city and replacing them with chain stores and temporary luxury businesses,” says Moss.

In addition, he says, banks will devalue a property if it’s occupied by a small business, and increase it for a chain store. “There’s benefit to waiting for chain stores. If you are a hedge fund manager running a portfolio you leave it empty and take a write-off.”

New York is famously a city of what author EB White called “tiny neighborhood units” is his classic 1949 essay Here is New York. White observed “that many a New Yorker spends a lifetime within the confines of an area smaller than a country village”.

In Vanishing New York, Moss writes of the toll the evisceration of distinct neighborhoods through real estate over-pricing has on the city. “It’s homogenizing and changing the character of the city,” he says. Even where landlords are offering competitive leases, they are often for two or five years, not the customary 10.

“We’re seeing more stores front emptying, and we’re seeing a lot of turnover where you see spaces fill temporarily and then empty. And it’s continuing to get worse,” he says.

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Shoppers in the financial district in New York. Photograph: Kevin Clogstoun/Getty Images/Lonely Planet Images

In business terms, the crisis in commercial real estate has led to a wave of consolidations. Earlier this month, France’s Unibail-Rodamco and Australia’s Westfield agreed to merge in a deal worth $24.7bn to form the world’s second-biggest owner of shopping malls, including Manhattan’s Brookfield Place.

Vacant real estate is not the only effect of an over-priced market; the boom in WeWork, a work-space company valued at around $20bn, and store pop-ups could also be responsible.

But some believe the market could have reached a turning point. “It’s like Hunger Games,” says New York retail property agent Robin Zendell. “If you’re smart and innovative you can survive this market. Landlords and retailers are having to listen to a new generation of shoppers.”

Like Moss, Zendell believes it’s too simplistic to blame Amazon. The same signals of over-pricing are seen in every area of real estate, including housing. “When you see [that] every corner has a bank or a pharmacy, and there is a gym on the second floor, there’s a simple reason for that: people can’t afford the rent.

Hard times for Whole Foods: 'People say it's for pretentious people. I can see why' Read more

“Why did restaurants go to Brooklyn? Because it’s cool? No, because it was cheap, and [because] restaurateurs were sick of giving investors’ money away so they could pay thir rent.”

In some areas, notably Bleecker Street, once lined with fashion boutiques including Ralph Lauren and Marc Jacobs, too many vacancies create their own problems. “Rents have fallen but now there are so many empty stores there, nobody wants to be alone. So they’ve created more of a crisis.”

But there are glimmers of turn-around. Zendell has observed five deals in SoHo in the past month, indicating that landlords are becoming too nervous to sit around. “They helped to create the bubble, but now it’s our market.”

Renters insist landlords have an investment in the game, either through taking a performance-based interest in the tenant or some other mechanism. Retailers that signed 10-year leases at a high number per sq ft and then had to pay to get out of that lease are insisting on some participation.

“Any new deal is going to have a pre-nup, the location has to be right, and the landlord has to have some skin in the game,” says Zendell.

Zendell also believes some retailers are beginning to find their way. She cites Everlane as an example of upcoming brand that is managing to harness the power of the internet to bricks-and-mortar retail. Online, she points out, is good for things you need, but less so for things you want.

“You still need people and interaction, but you need a different approach: the modern customer is very smart. Brick and mortar used to be only about sales, now it’s about marketing, driving people to the internet and for helping people to understand your product.”

weezingthejuicebodhi on December 24th, 2017 at 16:59 UTC »

Here is my two cents as a former retail manager and someone who has lived in a few different 'markets' ranging from backwater God's country to hustle n' bustle metropolis.

Rent is definitely a huge factor -- see shopping malls. My old RadioShack cost about $14K a month base in rent back in 2005 anchored next to a Sears. This of course didn't even account for other occupancy expenses, security, waste removal, etc. Bear in mind, being next to a Sears is often considered 'the budget friendly' side of the mall, if we were anchored to a more desirable store or in the center of the mall, then that rent easily doubles (or triples).

Online retailers hurt for many reasons -- some obvious, some not so much. The obvious is of course customers can shop from the comfort of their couch, in pajamas, without retail jargon and smoke-and-mirror sales pitches. Retailers did this to themselves - they didn't get hip to the jive of the future until it was way too late. As for the less obvious reasons:

Customers are more educated now (or at the very least - have quick access to the information they need).

No reason for 'loyalty' to any particular retailer -- The prices are the same everywhere now, the coupon restrictions are the same everywhere. The only reason to be loyal to a retailer is if they offer exceptional service - but that is tough because...

Retail employment is not a viable career choice for people with any respect for their time and quality of life. I heard about a mythical time in retail management in the 80s/90s/00s where retail managers were clearing well into six figures, fat bonuses, exotic perks, and life was pretty good. However, that all seemed to come crashing down around the time I got into retail ('05-'10). Retailers prey on young professionals or lifers and demand 50-60 hour work weeks on a salary that seems good on the surface until you figure out the actual hourly wage. As for the non-manager employee -- minimum wage. You can't retain specialized talent or people that give a damn for the long-term with these conditions. Which leads to:

The average shopping experience in retail sucks. Save for a few exceptions - most retailers are the same experience: Walk into a store, grossly understaffed, the people there range from useless to friendly - but seldom helpful, the prices aren't competitive, the selection is suspect, and the checkout process is a minefield. On top of that, the employees generally have too many assigned tasks to spend more than fifteen seconds with a customer. I wonder why?

The C-level at most of these companies is very incestuous. Unfortunately I can't cite any sources at the moment, but many companies generally cannibalize within the industry. That failing company that just went bankrupt last year? Yeah that CXO is probably in a similar position in another company. Rinse, lather, repeat.

There is a lot more to it than this, but I feel it portrays the current retail landscape. I don't know if it can (or should) be fixed, but I think the current model isn't sustainable.

Brooklyyyn23 on December 24th, 2017 at 14:52 UTC »

Can confirm, prices for street level store fronts around union square are insane. Your practically priced out unless you have a preexisting lease thats 10 plus years old or are part of a big corp that can afford to operate at a loss for the sake of exposure

AmIBeingInstained on December 24th, 2017 at 14:34 UTC »

I live off 4th avenue in Brooklyn below Atlantic terminal, and it's so fucking blighted it drives me crazy. Half the storefronts are empty. The closing stores say their rent is going up too much, but the rent hikes are totally anticipatory. The neighborhood is gentrifying, not gentrified. So landlords think they should get paid extra because the neighborhood is going to be rich, when the neighborhood can't support upscale stores yet because the market isn't mature.

Property speculators are the fucking worst. There should be a storefront vacancy tax so punitive nobody would even think about hiking their rent higher than a business could actually pay.