Hammond says cabinet has not had specific discussion about final Brexit outcome it wants - Politics live

Authored by theguardian.com and submitted by MutantFit
image for Hammond says cabinet has not had specific discussion about final Brexit outcome it wants - Politics live

Leo Varadkar, the Irish prime minister, is facing calls to “pick up the phone” to Arlene Foster to try and repair relations between Belfast and Dublin in a bid to finesse an Irish border deal.

Just two days after the Democratic Unionist Party leader torpedoed the Brexit deal, Varadkar faced questions in the Irish parliament about the deterioration of north-south relations, now at their most strained in decades.

“If we are to listen you are going to have to pick up the phone and talk to Arlene at some point. Have you any plans for that? And what she seems to be saying in recent days is that they were completely outside the loop for five weeks, didn’t know what the text was, didn’t know what the structure was [of the border deal],” said Green Party TD Eamon Ryan.

His questions came following accusations by Foster on Tuesday night that Ireland had been trying to push a united Ireland agenda and had approached the Irish border issue “aggressively”.

Varadkar ducked the direct question sticking to line that Ireland was part of team Europe and the lines of communication were London/Belfast and Ireland/Brussels.

He suggested the DUP should not get special treatment just because they are in a confidence and supply arrangement because that they were not the only party in Northern Ireland. Speaking in leader’s questions in the Dail, he said:

I would think it appropriate that all parties should be seeing the text at the same time. Obviously the European commission with our involvement negotiates on one side with the UK government on the other, but at the point at which texts are being shared with political parties I don’t see why the green party, which is north and south, shouldn’t see the text at same time as Sinn Fein and Fianna Fail and the DUP.

Varadkar was also asked if Ireland’s premature pronouncements on the impending agreement on Monday morning had helped scupper the deal.

He told the Dail that he had not spoken to media until Monday evening after the deal had gone sour.

Varadkar told TDs he expected to talk to Theresa May “in the coming days”. Sources say a call has not been scheduled for today.

jpdidz on December 6th, 2017 at 12:05 UTC »

Meanwhile the EU has carried out 47 (that they've made publicly available).

Edit: I didn't expect this slightly pithy remark to get so high up on here. Here is a link to the EU Impact Assessment page. At this point the EU is really hammering home how much of a ball ache it is for nations to leave the EU. They are doing a very effective job at establishing a precedence of wave after wave of deterrents.

MutantFit on December 6th, 2017 at 10:22 UTC »

Quick Summary thus far

David Davis admits no Impact Assessment has been done Uses the term sectoral analysis instead; says a report that uses the word impact is not an impact assessment Says economic models have all been wrong so he has not requested economic modeling Says that the UK Government has received the majority of all paperwork since remaining paperwork is duplicate or early report Rees-Mogg spins this atrociously by saying "If no Impact Assessments exist then the Government have gone above and beyond by providing paperwork to Parliament since they requested Impact Assessments" (Whichever side of the fence you sit on that was just outrageous; he should have kept quiet) Responds that Brexit will not see a drop in EU nurses in the UK (despite EU nurse applications dropping 96% since Brexit) The EU Parliament has been briefed to a greater extent by UK politicians than the UK Parliament Davis states that a Contingency Plan exist Highlights that Contingency Plans are based on real-life scenarios such as Nuclear Inspections; not theoretical economic events Davis tries to leave; Rees-Mogg reminds him that the Speaker said nothing is more important than giving evidence. Ouch!

In February you told MPs: “We continue to analyse the impact of our exit across the breadth of the UK economy.” The Commons motion calling for the impact assessments used that language.

Davis says that is not the same as an impact assessments.

Final question (which summarises nicely)

Benn: Did the government undertake an assessment of leaving the customs union before the cabinet took that decision?

Davis: Not a quantitative one, no, says Davis.

Benn: Isn’t that extraordinary?

Davis: No. The range of different outcomes it too wide. Some free trade agreements have been very effective, and others haven’t. Ministers had to take a judgment.

Additional Context

25 June, Davis: We have got 50, nearly 60 sectoral analyses done

06 Dec, Davis: No impact assessments have been done on the impact of Brexit

Dec 2016, Davis: We are in the midst of carrying out about 57 sets of analyses, each of which has implications for individual parts of 85% of the economy.

Dec 2017, Davis: The usefulness of such detailed impact assessments is near zero.

G_Morgan on December 6th, 2017 at 10:20 UTC »

Our government are fucking special. When you censor reports because you didn't even bother to do the research.