Study finds reading information aloud to yourself improves memory | Waterloo News

Authored by uwaterloo.ca and submitted by mvea

You are more likely to remember something if you read it out loud, a study from the University of Waterloo has found.

A recent Waterloo study found that speaking text aloud helps to get words into long-term memory. Dubbed the “production effect,” the study determined that it is the dual action of speaking and hearing oneself that has the most beneficial impact on memory.

“This study confirms that learning and memory benefit from active involvement,” said Colin M. MacLeod, a professor and chair of the Department of Psychology at Waterloo, who co-authored the study with the lead author, post-doctoral fellow Noah Forrin. “When we add an active measure or a production element to a word, that word becomes more distinct in long-term memory, and hence more memorable.”

The study tested four methods for learning written information, including reading silently, hearing someone else read, listening to a recording of oneself reading, and reading aloud in real time. Results from tests with 95 participants showed that the production effect of reading information aloud to yourself resulted in the best remembering.

“When we consider the practical applications of this research, I think of seniors who are advised to do puzzles and crosswords to help strengthen their memory. This study suggests that the idea of action or activity also improves memory. And we know that regular exercise and movement are also strong building blocks for a good memory,” said Professor MacLeod.

This research builds on previous studies by Professor MacLeod, Dr. Forrin, and colleagues that measure the production effect of activities, such as writing and typing words, in enhancing overall memory retention. This latest study shows that part of the memory benefit of speech stems from it being personal and self-referential.

The study was recently published in the journal Memory.

University of Waterloo is Canada’s top innovation university. With more than 36,000 students, we are home to the world's largest co-operative education system of its kind. Our unmatched entrepreneurial culture, combined with an intensive focus on research, powers one of the top innovation hubs in the world. Find out more at uwaterloo.ca

Attention broadcasters: Waterloo has facilities to provide broadcast quality audio and video feeds with a double-ender studio. Please contact us to book.

IcyTarget on December 2nd, 2017 at 16:03 UTC »

I'm currently an undergrad at this university and one of the techniques they encourage in my program is "rubber ducking" in which you explain concepts, out loud to a rubber duck or other inanimate object. This hopes to reinforce learned concepts by essentially hearing your own voice and interpreting what you are saying.

travis-42 on December 2nd, 2017 at 16:02 UTC »

This makes sense, but makes me wonder why I have trouble. When I read things out loud, my mind starts wandering and thinking about other things while I'm reading aloud (I think because I read out loud much more slowly than when reading silently), and I therefore process the content less than if I read silently.

It's even worse on things I care less about -- I can read an entire book to my kids at bedtime, complete with voices and inflection, and have no idea of what the book is about at the end.

Apparently more mind wandering while reading out loud is even a documented phenomenon:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23807760

Although their comprehension accuracies were similar for both reading conditions, participants reported more mind-wandering while they were reading aloud. These episodes of mindless reading were associated with nearly normal prosody, but were nevertheless distinguished by subtle fluctuations in volume that were predictive of both overall comprehension accuracy and individual sentence comprehension

mvea on December 2nd, 2017 at 14:04 UTC »

Journal Reference:

Noah D. Forrin, Colin M. MacLeod.

This time it’s personal: the memory benefit of hearing oneself.

Memory, 2017; 1

DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1383434

Link: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09658211.2017.1383434

Abstract:

The production effect is the memory advantage of saying words aloud over simply reading them silently. It has been hypothesised that this advantage stems from production featuring distinctive information that stands out at study relative to reading silently. MacLeod (2011) (I said, you said: The production effect gets personal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1197–1202. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0168-8) found superior memory for reading aloud oneself vs. hearing another person read aloud, which suggests that motor information (speaking), self-referential information (i.e., “I said it”), or both contribute to the production effect. In the present experiment, we dissociated the influence on memory of these two components by including a study condition in which participants heard themselves read words aloud (recorded earlier) – a first for production effect research – along with the more typical study conditions of reading aloud, hearing someone else speak, and reading silently. There was a gradient of memory across these four conditions, with hearing oneself lying between speaking and hearing someone else speak. These results imply that oral production is beneficial because it entails two distinctive components: a motor (speech) act and a unique, self-referential auditory input.