Congressmen demand investigation of FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, Sinclair Broadcast Group

Authored by static.techspot.com and submitted by Abscess2

Two members of the US House of Representatives have sent a formal letter to the Federal Communications Commission Inspector General calling for an investigation of Chairman Ajit Pai. Energy and Commerce Ranking Member Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ) and Oversight and Government Reform Ranking Member Elijah E. Cummings (D-MD) believe Pai "has taken actions to improperly benefit Sinclair Broadcast Group."

The investigation would focus on the interactions of Mr. Pai and officials at Sinclair Broadcast Group. The Congressmen believe Pai hasn't sufficiently answered questions related to these meetings and are hoping a federal investigation can clear things up.

They are questioning whether or not Pai and others at the FCC have used personal messaging channels and private emails to communicate with Sinclair. This would be a violation of the Federal Records Act and the Freedom of Information Act. The second part of the investigation centers around whether or not Mr. Pai's actions have shown a pattern of preferential treatment towards Sinclair.

Sinclair Broadcast Group is the second largest television station operator in the US and largest by total coverage. Their 173 different stations currently reach about 40% of American households and they are looking to grow by purchasing Tribune Media. Many believe recent decisions made by the FCC have been targeted to directly help Sinclair expand their reach. John Oliver ran a segment in July highlighting the practices of Sinclair and potential dangers of the merger.

The FCC recently rolled back TV station ownership limits which required stations to maintain studios on the communities they serve. This Thursday the FCC will vote on elimination additional restrictions. In a response to the request for investigation, Chairman Pai's office stated:

Unfortunately, this request appears to be part of many Democrats' attempt to target one particular company because of its perceived political views, an effort that dates all the way back to 2004 when Ranking Member Pallone, Ranking Member Cummings, and other Democrats demanded that the FCC investigate Sinclair based solely on the content of a documentary they didn't like and that hadn't even aired. Any claim that Chairman Pai is modifying the rules now to benefit one particular company is completely baseless. For many years, Chairman Pai has called on the FCC to update its media ownership regulations—one of which dates back to 1975. The Chairman is sticking to his long-held views, and given the strong case for modernizing these rules, it's not surprising that those who disagree with him would prefer to do whatever they can to distract from the merits of his proposals.

hopelessurchin on November 22nd, 2017 at 15:46 UTC »

Any claim that Chairman Pai is modifying the rules now to benefit one particular company is completely baseless.

Yeah. It's really more of a pattern of changes designed to create and empower a nationwide corporate oligarchy of hyper loyal media companies capable of restricting information access on as many platforms as possible for as many people as possible. It's very Putin-esque: blurring the line between business and government with a focus on loyalty, control over individuals, and wealth centralization.

dougdd on November 22nd, 2017 at 15:09 UTC »

While he's at it, wish AG would bring up why he's messing around with Net Neutrality.

vessel_for_the_soul on November 22nd, 2017 at 14:43 UTC »

What we need are laws to prevent this. I am becoming numb to the ever persistent battle every few months. They are going to win unless it can be stopped indefinitely