Thinking in a foreign language, we’re less prone to superstition

Authored by digest.bps.org.uk and submitted by psioni
image for Thinking in a foreign language, we’re less prone to superstition

Operating in our second language can have some intriguing psychological effects. We swear more freely and linger longer on embarrassing topics than normal. We’re also less susceptible to cognitive biases. According to psychologist Constantinos Hadjichristidis at the University of Trento, this is because a second language discourages us from relying on intuitive thinking. In a new paper in The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Hadjichristidis and his colleagues have shown another way that this manifests – when thinking in a foreign language, we’re less prone to superstition.

In one experiment, 400 native German speakers with proficiency in English imagined themselves in various scenarios, described either in German or English text, about an important day, like the morning before an exam or the day of a job application deadline. Each scenario involved a break in the routine, which was either mundane (like discovering the kitchen sink being blocked or spotting an airplane in the sky), or had a superstitious connotation – negative, like a mirror breaking, or positive, such as spotting a falling star in the sky. Participants rated how positive or negative they would feel in these situations, responding in the same language as the text.

Reading and responding in English, rather than German, made no difference to participants’ ratings of how they’d feel following a mundane event, but led to them describing less intense emotional reactions to the events with a superstitious connotation: they said they’d feel less negative about the bad luck events and less positive about the good luck events.

What’s happening here? Intuition depends on easily accessible connections, such as the term “broken mirror” being repeatedly associated with dismay or discomfort. These connections tend to be built in earlier life, and invariably in our native tongue (the German participants in this research had only begun learning English from age 12, on average). When we encounter a concept loaded with superstitious symbolism in our second tongue, we know what it means literally, but the emotional associations don’t come along automatically.

Left unchecked, our thinking is always influenced by our intuitions, which means even those who want to live as hard-nosed materialists may find magical thinking creeping in through the side gate. One way to combat this is to monitor the ideas that form and try to expel the unwanted influences. But this research suggests another approach: bar the gate so the influences don’t enter in the first place. For now, this option is only available to bilinguals, but it opens a route for discovering other modes of thinking that are more intuition-free.

—Breaking Magic: Foreign Language Suppresses Superstition

Alex Fradera (@alexfradera) is Staff Writer at BPS Research Digest

_Exordium on November 21st, 2017 at 16:46 UTC »

Intuition depends on easily accessible connections, such as the term “broken mirror” being repeatedly associated with dismay or discomfort. These connections tend to be built in earlier life, and invariably in our native tongue (the German participants in this research had only begun learning English from age 12, on average). When we encounter a concept loaded with superstitious symbolism in our second tongue, we know what it means literally, but the emotional associations don’t come along automatically.

This is quite interesting! I wonder if it has something to do with one's capacity to understand more conceptual or complex thought processes through an unfamiliar or different language structure.

01-MACHINE_GOD-10 on November 21st, 2017 at 15:52 UTC »

I've always wanted to know what a psychotic, schizophrenic, etc. person would be delusional about if not culturally exposed to gods, ghosts, etc.

PHealthy on November 21st, 2017 at 13:52 UTC »

Man, this is such a rabbit hole of a topic...

Something interesting I found along the way from 1989:

The law of contagion is one of the laws of sympathetic magic put forth about 100 years ago to account for magical belief systems in traditional cultures. This law holds that when two objects (usually animate) come into contact with each other, there is a potentially permanent exchange of properties between them.

...

Our findings do not actually indicate a belief in backward causation; they simply report effects consistent with it under suitable conditions. Although we cannot, at this point, eliminate the associative interpretation, contagion accounts well for certain features of people's reactions to situations that involve contact and are difficult to explain by the associative view. For instance, why would many individuals become more upset by wearing an innocent-looking sweater that was once worn by Adolph Hitler than by holding a book written about him, with his name and picture allover the cover and the story of his life inside? The explanation of "stronger association" begs the question of why brief contact should result in such strong associations.

We take the results of our questionnaire at face value as representing the attitudes of our subjects. Our concern with demand characteristics is mitigated by our observations of abundant examples of contagion in everyday thinking and behavior in this culture, including attachments to objects related to one's family history, the high value placed on former possessions of famous people, and hysteria about contact with AIDS victims. We view the magical law of contagion as a significant influence in people's reactions to objects in the world.

Operation of the sympathetic magical law of contagion in interpersonal attitudes among Americans PDF