In 2016, Russian Bots Were Busy Supporting Brexit, Too

Authored by slate.com and submitted by DiceIT
image for In 2016, Russian Bots Were Busy Supporting Brexit, Too

Russians agents sure do seem to love Twitter. Before and after the Brexit vote in June 2016, more than 156,000 bots and troll accounts that had Russian registered as their language were posting in English in support of the British departure from the European Union. According the New York Times' report on a new study, those accounts tweeted about Brexit 45,000 times in the final 48 hours before the vote.

A separate report from the Guardian on Tuesday detailed that 3,500 tweets with Brexit-related hashtags came from 419 of the 2,752 accounts Twitter identified to Congress as stemming from the Kremlin-supported Internet Research Agency.

“These accounts were definitely using Brexit hashtags,” Laura Cram, a professor from the University of Edinburgh who co-authored the research on the Russian accounts shared with Congress, said in the New York Times. “But we cannot say whether they were primarily trying to influence Brexit or whether it was a side effect of them trying to wreak discord generally.” Seventy percent of these accounts were actually tweeting their Brexit content after the election. It is similar to what we’ve seen in the U.S., where bots and trolls continued to use their large social media following well after the 2016 election. After the alt-right rally in Charlottesville, for example, Russian-linked bots were tweeting divisive and counterfactual content that appeared tailored to deepen American political divisions.

This news comes a day after the British government’s lead cybersecurity official, Ciaran Martin of the National Cyber Security Center, shared remarks accusing Russian hackers of attacking British energy, telecom, and media companies over the past 12 months. Again, this account is parallel to incidents in the U.S. earlier this year. In July, the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI found evidence that hackers had penetrated the networks of nuclear power plants, as well as computer networks critical to the U.S. energy sector. Those attacks uses similar techniques to those used by the Russian hacking group known as “Energetic Bear,” known for its ties to previous attacks on energy industry computer networks.

Finally, the fact that Russian Twitter accounts were cheering for Brexit is also suspicious in light of Cambridge Analytica’s involvement with the Leave.EU campaign. Cambridge Analytica, which also worked for the Trump campaign, has been roped into the U.S. special investigation into Russian interference in the election. And the CEO of the company, Alexander Nix, reportedly reached out to WikiLeaks about Hilary Clinton-related emails while in contract negotiations to join the Trump campaign. U.S. intelligence officials believe WikiLeaks worked with Russian military intelligence to release stolen Clinton-related emails in 2016.

platinumgulls on November 16th, 2017 at 16:26 UTC »

Some interesting points I've gleaned over the last few months when listening to both sides and talking to friends and family. . .

1 - Most of the "propaganda" was put out to sow discord over a particular issue.

2 - Most people had no idea the Russians didn't support any side in the US Elections, they were running ads for nearly every SJW group, TEA party, pro-gun, anti-gun and a myriad of other groups. In effect, they were attempting to re-enforce your views about something, not try and sway you to the other side. When you do this, you increase the divide between people, increase the division and tamp down discourse. In effect, it makes people more prone to hostility in dealing with opposing viewpoints, then being able to discuss them in a rational way.

3 - Most people had no idea they Russians have been trying to influence US politics since the 1960's when they started conspiracy theories about the JFK assassination, or spread lies about J Edgar Hoover. This game has been going on for a quite a while between the US and Russia.

Herakleios on November 16th, 2017 at 14:45 UTC »

Pretty clear that the West and liberal democracy needs to spend some serious time and resources trying to strengthen its institutions to protect from this sort of interference in the future.

Case in Point: Some of the top comments on this very thread are people claiming the whole thing is hogwash and it couldn't possibly have had any effect on the election. But, obviously, that's a ridiculous position to take. We know that there are a large number of bots and Russian operatives who are working towards manipulation of the public discourse. We also know that these methods are effective, because they're a lot of the same methods used by companies and corporations to sway public perception.

Obviously, we are yet to know the degree of the issue, but the fact that there are people claiming it "doesn't look like anything to me" is a sign of their success.

EDIT: grammar and punctuation

57_4f_50_52 on November 16th, 2017 at 14:34 UTC »

pretty obvious that russia is engaging in divide-and-conquer tactics with the EU, USA, and NATO in general