Increased food production and reduced water use through optimized crop distribution

Authored by nature.com and submitted by Wagamaga
image for Increased food production and reduced water use through optimized crop distribution

Growing demand for agricultural commodities for food, fuel and other uses is expected to be met through an intensification of production on lands that are currently under cultivation. Intensification typically entails investments in modern technology — such as irrigation or fertilizers — and increases in cropping frequency in regions suitable for multiple growing seasons. Here we combine a process-based crop water model with maps of spatially interpolated yields for 14 major food crops to identify potential differences in food production and water use between current and optimized crop distributions. We find that the current distribution of crops around the world neither attains maximum production nor minimum water use. We identify possible alternative configurations of the agricultural landscape that, by reshaping the global distribution of crops within current rainfed and irrigated croplands based on total water consumption, would feed an additional 825 million people while reducing the consumptive use of rainwater and irrigation water by 14% and 12%, respectively. Such an optimization process does not entail a loss of crop diversity, cropland expansion or impacts on nutrient and feed availability. It also does not necessarily invoke massive investments in modern technology that in many regions would require a switch from smallholder farming to large-scale commercial agriculture with important impacts on rural livelihoods.

Ed_Radley on November 11st, 2017 at 15:26 UTC »

One thing coming from the perspective of a farmer is the risk they are taking when they pick what crops to grow. The easiest way for them to minimize this type of financial risk is to grow a variety of crops on their land so if one does poorly and another does well they essentially cancel each other out. Taking away their autonomy as to what crops can be grown where does the exact opposite on the risk side, meaning they aren't able to here against something doing poorly, needing further government subsidies to compensate them for this potential outcome.

No_Place_Safe on November 11st, 2017 at 14:40 UTC »

The problem is not producing the food, it is infrastructure.

The food is rotten before it reaches its destination.

and most of starving people do not live where there are good roads, so you gotta transport many million tons of food on dogshit bumpy roads or off-road.

paitris on November 11st, 2017 at 13:46 UTC »

There is usually a reason why a certain crop is grown at a certain spot, 'swapping' is a little weird as a concept in this case