Study: Americans are retiring later, dying sooner and sicker in-between

Authored by dailyherald.com and submitted by ekser

Study: Americans are retiring later, dying sooner and sicker in-between

Data released recently suggest Americans' health is declining and millions of middle-age workers face the prospect of shorter, and less active, retirements than their parents enjoyed. Thinkstock photo

The U.S. retirement age is rising, as the government pushes it higher and workers stay in careers longer.

But life spans aren't necessarily extending to offer equal time on the beach. Data released recently suggest Americans' health is declining and millions of middle-age workers face the prospect of shorter, and less active, retirements than their parents enjoyed.

Here are the stats: The U.S. age-adjusted mortality rate -- a measure of the number of deaths per year -- rose 1.2 percent from 2014 to 2015, according to the Society of Actuaries. That's the first year-over-year increase since 2005, and only the second rise greater than 1 percent since 1980.

At the same time that Americans' life expectancy is stalling, public policy and career tracks mean millions of U.S. workers are waiting longer to call it quits. The age at which people can claim their full Social Security benefits is gradually moving up, from 65 for those retiring in 2002 to 67 in 2027.

Almost one in three Americans age 65 to 69 is still working, along with almost one in five in their early 70s.

Postponing retirement can make financial sense, because extended careers can make it possible to afford retirements that last past age 90 or even 100. But a study out this month adds some caution to that calculation.

Americans in their late 50s already have more serious health problems than people at the same ages did 10 to 15 years ago, according to the journal Health Affairs.

University of Michigan economists HwaJung Choi and Robert Schoeni used survey data to compare middle-age Americans' health. A key measure is whether people have trouble with an "activity of daily living," or ADL, such as walking across a room, dressing and bathing themselves, eating, or getting in or out of bed. The study showed the number of middle-age Americans with ADL limitations has jumped: 12.5 percent of Americans at the current retirement age of 66 had an ADL limitation in their late 50s, up from 8.8 percent for people with a retirement age of 65.

At the current retirement age of 66, a quarter of Americans age 58 to 60 rated themselves in "poor" or "fair" health. That's up 2.6 points from the group who could retire with full benefits at 65, the Michigan researchers found.

Cognitive skills have also declined over time. For those with a retirement age of 66, 11 percent already had some kind of dementia or other cognitive decline at age 58 to 60, according to the study. That's up from 9.5 percent of Americans just a few years older, with a retirement age between 65 and 66.

While death rates can be volatile from year to year, Choi and Schoeni's study is part of a raft of other research showing the health of Americans deteriorating.

Researchers have offered many theories for why Americans' health is getting worse. Princeton University economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton, a Nobel Prize winner, have argued that an epidemic of suicide, drug overdoses and alcohol abuse have caused a spike in death rates among middle-age whites.

Higher rates of obesity may also be taking their toll. And Americans may have already seen most of the benefits from previous positive developments that cut the death rate, such as a decline in smoking and medical advances like statins that fight cardiovascular disease.

Declining health and life expectancy are good news for one constituency: Pension plans, which must send a monthly check to retirees for as long as they live.

According to the latest figures from the Society of Actuaries, life expectancy for pension participants has dropped since its last calculation by 0.2 years. A 65-year-old man can expect to live to 85.6 years, and a woman can expect to make it to 87.6. As a result, the group calculates a typical pension plan's obligations could fall by 0.7 percent to 1 percent.

WinterSoCool on November 3rd, 2017 at 04:03 UTC »

I work in the Disability Insurance industry, and we commonly call this the Airbag Effect.

It used to be that you'd get in a car wreck and die. After airbags, you now get in a car wreck and are just injured or maimed.

Improvements in medical care prevent premature deaths, resulting in a HUGE increase in a sick and disabled population.

So the population mentioned in the article that used to enjoy a long and healthy retirement, is still there in today's population. There's just an added subsection of disabled individuals, who would have died at the onset of their disease in past generations.

Just in the last 15 years there been a 38% increase in the number of individuals making claims for social security durability: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/dibStat.html

kerovon on November 3rd, 2017 at 03:56 UTC »

I'm going to copy out the discussion section of the paper.

When the Social Security policy of increasing the normal retirement age was enacted in 1983, the first cohort to have an age older than 65 was just 45 years old, and the first cohort that would be required to work to age 67 was only 23 years old. The cohorts with higher normal retirement ages are now about 60–70—approaching the ages when most Americans retire.

The findings of our study are consistent with recent evidence indicating that the health of Americans in their 50s and early 60s has not improved over the past two decades6 and may, in fact, have worsened.7,8 A study by Anne Case and Angus Deaton found that morbidity and mortality increased between 1997 and 2013 for non-Hispanic whites ages 45–54.9 These recent trends follow a period of significant and rapid improvement in the health of the older population.10

Workers’ choice of the age at which to claim Social Security retirement benefits moves in tandem with increases in the normal retirement age.11,12 Therefore, we can expect that the birth cohorts with a higher normal retirement age will retire and claim benefits at a later age than previous cohorts—despite the fact that they are in worse health on most dimensions. The likely consequence is an increase in the share of workers in their fifties and sixties who are in poor health, which will create significant challenges for them and their employers. Applications for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits may also rise, with insurance payments helping people who are unable to work at the higher ages. These benefits, however, are not likely to fully meet the need filled by Social Security retirement benefits.

The Social Security Trust Fund is currently projected to be depleted in 2034.13 Increasing the normal retirement age is a commonly proposed solution to this fiscal challenge. However, given the recent changes in health among the cohorts now approaching typical retirement age, further increases in the normal retirement age would place a substantial and disproportionate burden on these cohorts.

Applejuiceinthehall on November 3rd, 2017 at 01:45 UTC »

I don't think you can look at a one year drop in life expectancy and determine that people are dying sooner especially since 2016 numbers didn't show the same. We will have to wait longer to know if it was a tend or just a blip.