Your eyes make waste. Without it, you could go blind

Authored by sciencemag.org and submitted by TR_54

Your eyes make waste. Without it, you could go blind

One man’s trash is another man’s treasure, even at the level of the cell. That’s where—according to new research—a waste product of the retina fuels part of the eye that powers the rods and cones that help us sense light. Without this waste, that part of the eye “steals” glucose from the retina, leading to the death of retinal cells and likely vision loss. The finding could help explain why eyesight degenerates with age—and in diseases such as macular degeneration and diabetes.

“It’s almost a revolutionary concept” that there is such a tight coupling between the two parts of the eye, says Stephen Tsang, a retina specialist at Columbia University who was not involved in the work.

Rods and cones are very active, and they need a lot of energy to do their jobs. Exactly how they get this energy has long been a mystery. In previous studies, researchers showed that a layer of cells beneath the retina, the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), ferries glucose from the blood to the retina. But it was unclear why the RPE didn’t keep the glucose for itself.

After a decade of study, biochemist James Hurley at the University of Washington in Seattle and his colleagues have now shown that the retina’s rods and cones burn the glucose, convert leftovers into a fuel called lactate, and then feed that back to the RPE. “There is a growing consensus that no cell exists on its own in complex tissues like the retina,” says Martin Friedlander, an ophthalmologist at The Scripps Research Institute in San Diego, California, who was not involved with the new work.

To precisely map how glucose and lactate move around in the eye, Hurley and colleagues grew human RPE in a lab dish and studied its biochemistry along with that of isolated mouse retinas. They discovered that the RPE’s power plants—the mitochondria—burn lactate to power the RPE. “That allows the glucose to go through without being consumed,” Hurley explains. If they deprive the RPE of lactate, then those cells switch to burning the glucose instead of delivering it to the retina, the team reports this month in eLife. With glucose shut off, the retina cells can die.

“The interplay between the different pathways is really important and [this] work really shows it,” says Deborah Ferrington, a vision science researcher at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. Her own work has implicated mitochondrial defects in macular degeneration, indicating a possible connection between vision loss in that disease and glucose starvation. The new work also “gives you the opportunities to find interventions,” she adds.

One of those could be a widely applicable drug or nutritional supplement, says Tsang, who has been involved in developing gene therapy for treating eye diseases. Even though mutations in many genes may result in glucose starvation, “one treatment may treat all the different gene [defects],” he suggests.

The work may also explain a big ophthalmological mystery. Researchers could never understand why cones, which enable us to see in color, die out when rods, which work in dim light, are defective, explains Zsolt Ablonczy, a pharmacologist at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston. He says he now realizes that if defective rods fail to make lactate, that may cause the energy-deprived RPE to steal all the glucose, essentially starving both cones and rods. He studies aging effects in the eye, which he thinks may arise in part when there’s an imbalance between lactate or glucose in the RPE. Hurley’s observations are “absolutely fundamental,” he notes.

But Hurley and others caution that researchers must first demonstrate this energy exchange in the eyes of living animals to really know what’s going on. “The observations reported in this study are valuable,” says Friedlander, but it’s unclear how this process works in an eye in a living person, particularly when there are defects. Thus, he adds, “It is still unclear” how the findings could be used to prevent eye disease.

VitaminsEveryday on October 18th, 2017 at 05:57 UTC »

Graduate student in a metabolism lab here. I'd like to make a few comments on this study. We're about to get deep, deep into metabolism esoterica...

There is no doubt that certain cells such as those of the liver can clear circulating blood lactate and regenerate from it glucose for the rest of the body. However, the argument for lactate functioning as a fuel for cells is really based on some shoddy science. Recently, there has been a surge of papers in the field suggesting that lactate is used as a fuel for some cell types. Perhaps the boldest claim was made in a recently published Cell paper that suggests lactate is used as a fuel by cancer cells. If this is true, then we really have to reevaluate one of the longest-known hallmarks of what it means to be a cancer cell: the Warburg effect. The Warburg effect was a phenomenon observed by Otto Warburg in the early 20th century, where he saw that cancer cells consumed a lot of glucose and excreted a lot of lactate (the aforementioned "waste" in these studies). Additionally, the Warburg effect was also observed in the retina. So, in conclusion, cancer cells and retinal cells were historically observed to excrete lactate. In other words, they are not eating the lactate.

Now, these papers suggest that the Warburg effect may not be what's really happening. The experiment they did to argue in favor of that hypothesis is that they add onto cells lactate with a label on it (in the form of a heavy carbon atom). They then saw observance of this label into pyruvate, which is a molecule that can generate energy for cells. On first pass, one could be inclined to conclude from this experiment that since we see lactate label into the pyruvate, it must be entering the Krebs cycle. However, it is really important to realize that chemical reactions within the cell are all reversible. Thus, if there is a pathway for lactate to become pyruvate, then there necessarily is a pathway for pyruvate to become lactate. Every street that connects between two metabolites is a two-way street.

Now, consider this theoretical experiment: I am interesting in showing that every afternoon during rush hour the net flow of traffic is from Cambridge MA into Boston MA. To address this question, I paint a star on every single car in Cambridge. One hour later, I look to see how many cars in Boston have a star on it. While there is no doubt that I am going to be able to find cars with stars painted on them in Boston, this experiment alone is insufficient to demonstrate that the net flow of traffic is from Cambridge into Boston.** In fact, this experiment is completely agnostic to the presence of any traffic flowing from Boston into Cambridge, rendering it completely useless!** You can't calculate a net flow without first calculating the forward and a reverse flow.

Alas, this is exactly what these studies have done. They measured flow of lactate carbons into the cell using a tracer. They never measured the flow of lactate out of the cell. They then use their tracer study to make a net flow argument. While the retina study does have interesting observations scattered throughout the text, I sincerely believe that the proposed mechanism of lactate metabolism is not supported by the data presented.

tuck190 on October 18th, 2017 at 03:52 UTC »

is it really waste if it's used?

Master_of_Abstinence on October 18th, 2017 at 01:47 UTC »

Maybe we need better terminology than waste