Ion Thruster Prototype Breaks Records in Tests, Could Send Humans to Mars

Authored by space.com and submitted by GloryHoleVampire
image for Ion Thruster Prototype Breaks Records in Tests, Could Send Humans to Mars

Scott Hall makes some final adjustments to the X3 ion thruster at the University of Michigan before a test.

A thruster that's being developed for a future NASA mission to Mars broke several records during recent tests, suggesting that the technology is on track to take humans to the Red Planet within the next 20 years, project team members said.

The X3 thruster, which was designed by researchers at the University of Michigan in cooperation with NASA and the U.S. Air Force, is a Hall thruster — a system that propels spacecraft by accelerating a stream of electrically charged atoms, known as ions. In the recent demonstration conducted at NASA's Glenn Research Center in Ohio, the X3 broke records for the maximum power output, thrust and operating current achieved by a Hall thruster to date, according to the research team at the University of Michigan and representatives from NASA.

"We have shown that X3 can operate at over 100 kW of power," said Alec Gallimore, who is leading the project, in an interview with Space.com. "It operated at a huge range of power from 5 kW to 102 kW, with electrical current of up to 260 amperes. It generated 5.4 Newtons of thrust, which is the highest level of thrust achieved by any plasma thruster to date," added Gallimore, who is dean of engineering at the University of Michigan. The previous record was 3.3 Newtons, according to the school.

Hall thrusters and other types of ion engines use electricity (usually generated by solar panels) to expel plasma — a gas-like cloud of charged particles — out a nozzle, thus generating thrust. This technique can propel spacecraft to much greater speeds than chemical propulsion rockets can, according to NASA.

That's why researchers are so interested in ion propulsion's potential application for long-distance space travel. Whereas the maximum velocity that can be achieved by a chemical rocket is about 5 kilometers per second, a Hall thruster could get a craft up to 40 kilometers per second, Gallimore said.

Ion engines are also known to be more efficient than chemical-powered rockets, featuring what Gallimore described as a better "miles per gallon" ratio. A Hall-thruster-powered spacecraft would get cargo and astronauts to Mars using much less propellant than a chemical rocket, he said. (A common propellant for ion thrusters is xenon; indeed, NASA's Dawn spacecraft, which is currently orbiting the dwarf planet Ceres, uses this gas.)

A head-on shot of the X3 ion thruster firing at 50 kilowatts, viewed through a warped mirror in the vacuum chamber. Credit: NASA

"You can think of electric propulsion as having 10 times the miles per gallon compared to chemical propulsion," Gallimore told Space.com.

The trade-off with ion thrusters, however, is that they are very low thrust and therefore must operate for a long time to accelerate a spacecraft to high speeds, according to NASA. (In addition, ion thrusters aren't powerful enough to overcome Earth's gravitational pull, so they cannot be used to launch spacecraft.)

"Chemical propulsion systems can generate millions of kilowatts of power, while the existing electrical systems only achieve 3 to 4 kilowatts," Gallimore said.

Commercially available Hall thrusters are not nearly powerful enough to propel a crewed Mars spacecraft, he added.

"What we would need for human exploration is a system that can process something like 500,000 watts (500 kW), or even a million watts or more," Gallimore said. "That's something like 20, 30 or even 40 times the power of conventional electric propulsion systems."

That's where the X3 comes in. Gallimore and his team are addressing the power problem by making the thruster bigger than these other systems and by developing a design that addresses one of the technology's shortcomings.

"We figured out that instead of having one channel of plasma, where the plasma generated is exhausted from the thruster and produces thrust, we would have multiple channels in the same thruster," Gallimore said. "We call it a nested channel."

According to Gallimore, using three channels allowed the engineers to make X3 much smaller and more compact than an equivalent single channel Hall thruster would have to be.

A side shot of the X3 ion thruster firing at 50 kilowatts. Credit: NASA

The University of Michigan team has been working on the technology in cooperation with the Air Force since 2009. First, the researchers developed a two-channel thruster, the X2, before moving on to the more powerful X3, which has three channels.

In February 2016, the team partnered with California-based rocket-maker Aerojet Rocketdyne, which is developing a new electrical propulsion system, called XR-100, for NASA's Next Space Technologies for Exploration Partnerships, or NextSTEP program. The X3 thruster is a central part of the XR-100 system.

Scott Hall, a Ph.D. student at the University of Michigan who has worked on the X3 project for the past five years, said the work has been rather challenging because of the thruster's size.

"It's heavy — 500 pounds [227 kilograms]. It's almost a meter in diameter," Hall said. "Most Hall thrusters are the kind of thing that one or two people can pick up and carry around the lab. We need a crane to move X3 around."

Next year, the team will run an even bigger test, which aims to prove that the thruster can operate at full power for 100 hours. Gallimore said the engineers are also designing a special magnetic shielding system that would keep the plasma away from the walls of the thruster to prevent damage and enable the thruster to operate reliably for even longer periods of time. Gallimore said that without the shielding a flight version X3 would probably start experiencing problems after several thousand hours of operations. A magnetically-shielded version could run for several years at full power, according to Gallimore.

Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.

ButchTheBiker on October 14th, 2017 at 03:33 UTC »

I often think of people on a mission taking years to travel and then a ship pulls up to it and says they discovered new technology and just left Earth a few days ago.

Decronym on October 14th, 2017 at 01:49 UTC »

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters ASAP Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel, NASA Arianespace System for Auxiliary Payloads BFR Big Falcon Rocket (2017 enshrinkened edition) Yes, the F stands for something else; no, you're not the first to notice BFS Big Falcon Spaceship (see BFR) DSG NASA Deep Space Gateway, proposed for lunar orbit GEO Geostationary Earth Orbit (35786km) HEO High Earth Orbit (above 35780km) Human Exploration and Operations (see HEOMD) HEOMD Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate, NASA Isp Specific impulse (as explained by Scott Manley on YouTube) KSP Kerbal Space Program, the rocketry simulator LEO Low Earth Orbit (180-2000km) Law Enforcement Officer (most often mentioned during transport operations) RTG Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator SABRE Synergistic Air-Breathing Rocket Engine, hybrid design by Reaction Engines SMART "Sensible Modular Autonomous Return Technology", ULA's engine reuse philosophy SoI Saturnian Orbital Insertion maneuver Sphere of Influence ULA United Launch Alliance (Lockheed/Boeing joint venture) VLEO V-band constellation in LEO Very Low Earth Orbit Jargon Definition hypergolic A set of two substances that ignite when in contact

15 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 37 acronyms. [Thread #2017 for this sub, first seen 14th Oct 2017, 01:49] [FAQ] [Contact] [Source code]

OllieGarkey on October 13rd, 2017 at 21:04 UTC »

So could someone tell me how much further we have to go here?

5 Newtons, up from 3 newtons.

The Atlas 5 rockets produced a maximum of 3.8 million newtons.

Can this be scaled?

I recognize the superiority of energy thrusters to chemical thrusters when it comes to interplanetary travel, I'm just wondering about the time frame here.