Preschool teachers need better training in science

Authored by msutoday.msu.edu and submitted by mvea

Preschool teachers need better training in science

Preschool instructors appear to lack the knowledge, skills and confidence to effectively teach their young students science – a problem that is likely contributing to America’s poor global performance in this crucially important subject.

A first-of-its-kind study by Michigan State University researchers found that early childhood educators’ self-reported ability and enjoyment was high for literacy, but much lower for science and math.

Further, while 99 percent of preschool teachers engaged in literacy instruction three to four times a week, that figure fell to 75 percent in math and only 42 percent in science.

Only 38 percent of U.S. fourth-graders were proficient in science in 2015, according to a report from the National Assessment of Educational Progress.

“Providing quality early-childhood science education is one way to improve the very low science achievement of U.S. elementary school children,” said lead author Hope Gerde, associate professor in MSU’s Department of Human Development and Family Studies. “However, it seems the preschool teachers in our study were more confident of their ability in literacy than in science – likely creating a gap between children’s literacy development and science skills.”

The study, funded by the National Science Foundation, is published in the journal Early Education and Development.

Gerde and colleagues studied 67 Head Start classrooms for children ages 3-5. This early childhood period is a time when kids begin developing knowledge and skills for science, she said, adding that preschool children have the capacity to engage in and learn from scientific thinking.

The study is the first to examine preschool teachers’ “self-efficacy” – or their belief in their ability and enjoyment for an academic area – in literacy, math and science.

Gerde said preschool teachers may struggle with science due to lack of quality training, preparation or an aversion to science. Teachers may also feel pressure from policymakers and school administrators to focus on literacy – to the possible exclusion of science.

Importantly, the study found that only teachers with high knowledge and skills for science – not literacy or math – created quality scientific opportunities for students, such as providing science materials and engaging children in science experiences in the classroom.

“If we are to improve U.S. children’s science learning,” Gerde said, “we must provide quality opportunities, in teacher education programs and professional development offerings, for early childhood teachers to develop knowledge and skills in science.”

Co-authors are MSU researchers Steven Pierce, Kyungsook Lee and Laurie Van Egeren.

frechel on September 27th, 2017 at 19:00 UTC »

If a community/town/county wants better teachers they are welcome to raise teaching salaries. I have outgoing engineering friends that are great with kids and have actually talked to a few that said they'd much prefer being a teacher but they aren't okay with making 35k a year.

ChiraqBluline on September 27th, 2017 at 18:30 UTC »

Early childhood teacher here:

The big push in ECE is reading and writing right now, it's the easiest to "show off", looks good on paper, and has instant results. Parents push for it because they can see the progress at any level and schools push for it because it leads to early readers.

The problem is that early reading means nothing without context, watching a kid read early is so cute, they can sound out the words, identify with the picture and wow the crowds, but when you question them, they have no context. "What's a theatre", "whats a vet", "why is she crying". No context.

So now the push is for real life enrichment, which is basically prescience and premath. Teaching them cause and effect, patterns, states of matter, the weather, animal families, etc, needs experiences to drive it home. And your class can have their spacial relations down, their pattern recognition down and know why plants need sun, but it's not something visibly learned. So parents ask "What did you learn today" and the response is less then dazzling.

I love that everything at that age can fall under science and math. I hate that it's hard to come up with a "receipt of learned material" for parents and bosses.

giltwist on September 27th, 2017 at 15:36 UTC »

Without doxing myself, I have also published research that indicated many middle school teachers really don't understand science either. While understanding the origin of that problem was not part of the published research, I can tell you that there is increasing pressure on departments of education to reduce the number of credit hours required for the major as well as to lower the GPA requirements. I was teaching a junior-level methods class in which students were getting their first field experience with students, and most of the pre-service teachers hadn't even heard the name Piaget who is basically the father of modern teaching. That's like an electrical engineer not knowing the name Edison. Some states are moving to specialize elementary and middle school licenses so that no one teacher is expected to teach every subject. High school licenses have worked this way for decades.