Ride-hailing app Uber loses licence to operate in London

Authored by news.sky.com and submitted by ahnafm
image for Ride-hailing app Uber loses licence to operate in London

Transport for London says it will not renew Uber's private hire licence after finding it is "not fit and proper" to hold one.

TfL said the taxi-hailing app had demonstrated "a lack of corporate responsibility in relation to a number of issues which have potential public safety and security implications".

It has told the US-based company that it will not be issued with a new licence after the expiry of its current licence on 30 September.

Uber said it intended to challenge the decision immediately in the courts. It said TfL and London mayor Sadiq Khan had "caved in to a small number of people who want to restrict consumer choice".

:: 10 Uber-interesting facts from 'brilliant jerks' to forced selfies

Sky News had earlier revealed that TfL looked likely to rule against Uber.

Mr Khan said in a Facebook post that he fully supported TfL's decision.

Uber has about 40,000 drivers in London, and is used by about 3.5 million people.

TfL has today informed Uber that it will not be issued with a private hire operator licence. pic.twitter.com/nlYD0ny2qo — Transport for London (@TfL) September 22, 2017

It has 21 days to appeal the decision and can continue to operate until the end of any appeal process, TfL said.

The authority highlighted Uber's approach to reporting serious criminal offences, obtaining medical certificates and background checks on drivers, and its explanation of the use of "greyball" software that it said could be used to thwart regulators.

But Tom Elvidge, general manager of Uber in London, said: "If this decision stands, it will put more than 40,000 licensed drivers out of work and deprive Londoners of a convenient and affordable form of transport.

"This ban would show the world that, far from being open, London is closed to innovative companies who bring choice to consumers."

Providing an innovative service must not be at the expense of Londoners safety. My response to @TfL's Uber decision. https://t.co/iEUal9VLU3 pic.twitter.com/B9V0mEKrWr — Sadiq Khan (@SadiqKhan) September 22, 2017

He challenged findings made by TfL, saying Uber drivers were subject to the same checks as black cab drivers, that its technology had enhanced safety, that it followed TfL rules on reporting incidents, and that an independent review had already cleared it over the use of "greyball".

Uber was licensed as a private hire company in London in 2012 and has since grown rapidly - posing a challenge to the capital's traditional black cabs - but it has been caught up in the backlash against the so-called gig economy.

In May its licence was renewed by TfL, but only for a period of four months, amid continued opposition and threats of legal challenges from the GMB union and Licensed Taxi Drivers' Association (LTDA).

Video: Uber: 40,000 drivers will be put out of work

TUC general secretary Frances O'Grady said it should be a "cautionary tale for gig economy employers".

Unions have raised concerns about such companies treating workers as contractors rather than staff, often resulting in them losing out on rights such as minimum wage and holiday pay.

Video: Tfl: Uber 'not fit and proper' to operate in London

Business group London First said TfL's ruling "will be seen as a Luddite decision by millions of Londoners and international visitors who use Uber", and would damage London's reputation as a global tech hub.

It was described as a "disaster" by free market think-tank the Adam Smith Institute.

Uber operates in more than 600 locations around the world, including more than 40 towns and cities in the UK.

The company, which has been valued at almost $70bn, has been in turmoil in recent months over the conduct and subsequent exit of its founder, Travis Kalanick.

steepleton on September 22nd, 2017 at 11:23 UTC »

other side of the river?

this time of night?

fuck off mate

northboundtrain0015 on September 22nd, 2017 at 10:51 UTC »

From the article :

TfL said the taxi-hailing app had demonstrated "a lack of corporate responsibility in relation to a number of issues which have potential public safety and security implications".

Apparently this includes problems with mandatory criminal records checks and reporting of serious crimes. So it looks like it's at least partly a power struggle over serious regulatory issues. Uber has had these problems all over the world, so it's not particularly surprising.

Knowing London politics, I'm pretty sure it's also a power struggle between massive vested interests, including unions and black cab drivers. But I'm not sure Uber itself is 100% the 'white knight' in this fight.

Edit: More information about London Metropolitan police frustrations with Uber's safety procedures, including failure to report sexual assaults and lying to victims.

Edit2: A full rundown of Uber's global scandals so far, including illegally underpaying drivers, illegally spying on rivals, and illegally obtaining the medical records of a woman who reported being raped. C'mon guys, I like cheap and convenient stuff too, but you can't deny this company has serious ethical problems.

Edit3: Judging by the replies I'm getting, seems like quite a lot of redditors are in favour of a bonfire of the regulations when it comes to Uber. Well, I guess if Londoners are enraged by this, they'll punish the mayor and his team at the next election. That, at least, is one advantage of accountability to local government.

Edit4 (I'm in the pub, so excuse typos): The London Evening Standard are reporting that the mayor supports TfL's decision but isn't personally involved. Heh, sure, Sadiq. Also there are 3.5 million Uber users in London!

Strepski on September 22nd, 2017 at 10:21 UTC »

Anybody want to buy a white Toyota Prius good condition only 120,000 miles on the clock