Trump ends 'Dreamers' program, leaving fate of 800,000 uncertain

Authored by theguardian.com and submitted by saucytryhard
image for Trump ends 'Dreamers' program, leaving fate of 800,000 uncertain

Trump terminates Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which protects migrants from deportation, a move that Obama called ‘cruel’ and ‘wrong’

Donald Trump thrust the fate of nearly 800,000 young, undocumented migrants into uncertainty on Tuesday by terminating the Obama-era program that protects the so-called Dreamers from deportation.

What is Daca and who are the Dreamers? Read more

In response, Barack Obama said the decision was “self-defeating” and contrary to “basic decency”.

A “shadow has been cast over some of our best and brightest young people once again”, the former president said.

The 2012 policy known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca) will be phased out by 5 March 2018, leaving Congress with six months to enact new protections for Dreamers through legislation.

New applications will no longer be accepted, while those currently in the program will all lose their status by March 2020, with the first permits expiring in March 2018 – unless Congress passes legislation allowing the young immigrants to stay.

“I do not favor punishing children, most of whom are now adults, for the actions of their parents,” Trump said in a written statement issued shortly after attorney general Jeff Sessions announced the policy. “But we must also recognize that we are nation of opportunity because we are a nation of laws.”

Trump, who later told reporters he had “great love” for Dreamers, said he had advised the Department of Homeland Security that Daca recipients were “not enforcement priorities [for deportation] unless they are criminals, are involved in criminal activity, or are members of a gang”.

And he called on Congress to act, saying he was providing US lawmakers with “a window of opportunity” to address the status of Dreamers. “Congress, get ready to do your job - DACA!” he tweeted earlier.

But the president stopped short of outlining what sort of legislation he would support to codify protections for Dreamers into law.

Sessions announced the administration’s decision in a statement delivered from the Department of Justice headquarters in Washington in which he said Daca was “being rescinded”.

“To have a lawful system of immigration that serves the national interest,” Sessions said, “we cannot admit everyone who would like to come here. It’s just that simple.”

Trump’s move follows months of speculation over whether he would keep intact or tear apart the landmark executive action by Barack Obama that lifted the threat of deportation for migrants brought to the US before they were 16.

In a written statement published on social media that did not mention Trump by name, Obama denounced the decision as “self-defeating”.

“To target these young people is wrong – because they have done nothing wrong,” the former president said. “And it is cruel.”

“Ultimately, this is about basic decency. This is about whether we are a people who kick hopeful young strivers out of America, or whether we treat them the way we’d want our own kids to be treated. It’s about who we are as a people – and who we want to be.”

There are around 800,000 Daca recipients living in the US, who qualified by having been under the age of 31 as of 15 June 2012. Those applying were vetted for any criminal history or threat to national security and had to be students or have completed school or military service. Their status must be renewed every two years.

Sessions repeatedly referred to the group of young, undocumented immigrants as “illegal aliens” while declaring: “We are people of compassion ... But there’s nothing compassionate about the failure to enforce immigration laws.”

“This does not mean they are bad people or that our nation disrespects or demeans them in any way,” the attorney general, who took no questions from the assembled media, said of Dreamers. “It means we are properly enforcing our laws as Congress has passed them.”

Although Sessions did not provide a timeline for phasing out Daca, he noted that acting DHS secretary Elaine Duke had chosen “to initiate a wind-down process” in a bid to mitigate the immediate effects of the decision.

In a conference call with reporters on Tuesday, senior DHS officials said they would allow anyone with a Daca permit expiring between now and 5 March to apply for a two-year renewal, so long as the application is submitted by 5 October. But other Dreamers whose permits do not expire within the next six months would be poised to lose their status as early as 5 March, exposing them to the threat of deportation.

The administration also declared that new applications for Daca dated after 5 September will not be considered, shutting down access to the program for those who are not already beneficiaries.

The specifics of what legislation Trump would be willing to sign to protect Dreamers remained unclear. White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders suggested the president would not support a standalone bill to grant permanent legal status to Dreamers, telling reporters on Tuesday: “We can’t take just a one-piece fix. We’ve got to do an overall immigration reform that is responsible and is lawful.”

Instead, Sanders tied any White House support for a legislative fix for Daca to border security. “I don’t think the president has been shy about the fact that he wants a wall,” she said.

It takes someone with a dark heart to do something as cruel and pointless as this Democratic senator Chris Murphy

Trump’s decision was swiftly condemned by immigration advocates, business leaders and Democrats, while attorneys general from New York and Washington state said they would take legal action against the administration.

Many supporters of Daca pointed to the contributions of Dreamers – named after failed legislation in Congress – to their communities and economic prosperity, while noting the program already denied access to anyone who was convicted of a felony, significant misdemeanor, or deemed to be a threat to national security or public safety.

“This is a sad day for our country,” Facebook co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in a statement.

“The decision to end Daca is not just wrong. It is particularly cruel to offer young people the American Dream, encourage them to come out of the shadows and trust our government, and then punish them for it.”

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi accused Trump of committing “a deeply shameful act of political cowardice and a despicable assault on innocent young people in communities across America”.

“The president’s cruel and heartless decision to start deporting Dreamers in six months demands an immediate response from the Republican Congress,” she said.

Republican House speaker Paul Ryan, who in recent days expressed his hope that Trump would not terminate Daca, responded to Tuesday’s announcement by characterizing Obama’s policy as “well-intentioned” but “a clear abuse of executive authority [and] an attempt to create law out of thin air”.

“Congress writes laws, not the president, and ending this program fulfills a promise that President Trump made to restore the proper role of the executive and legislative branches,” Ryan said in a statement.

The House speaker nonetheless said it was important for Daca recipients to “have clarity” on how they would be affected in the phase-out period, while calling on Congress to act.

“It is my hope that the House and Senate, with the president’s leadership, will be able to find consensus on a permanent legislative solution that includes ensuring that those who have done nothing wrong can still contribute as a valued part of this great country,” Ryan said.

The highly partisan atmosphere in Congress will make the passage of any legislation to protect Dreamers an uphill battle. Democrats are near uniform in their support of the Dream Act, which seeks to provide Dreamers with a path to permanent residency, but previous iterations of the bill have fallen in the face of steep opposition from conservatives.

Democrats were scathing in their assessment of Trump’s decision to upend Daca without providing a legislative solution.

“It takes someone with a dark heart to do something as cruel and pointless as this,” Senator Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut.

US lawmakers, who returned to Washington on Tuesday after the August recess, already face a series of pressing fiscal deadlines in the coming weeks that include averting a government shutdown and securing emergency funding to deal with the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey.

Deportation of 'Dreamer' to Mexico appears to be first under Trump Read more

Trump’s decision to throw the vexing issue of immigration into the mix not only complicates a packed legislative agenda, but also raises the stakes ahead of the 2018 midterm elections. The president already shares a contentious rapport with Republicans in Congress, who might be reticent to cast politically thorny votes while fending off primary challenges from the right, where any pro-immigrant actions are viewed as “amnesty”.

Pressure had mounted on Trump to determine the fate of Daca. Activists on the right bemoaned the president’s failure to immediately rescind it.

In an attempt to force a decision, 10 state attorneys general, led by Ken Paxton of Texas, imposed an arbitrary deadline of 5 September on which they threatened to take the administration to court. One of those attorneys general, Tennessee’s Herbert Slatery III, backed away from the threat last week.

Immigration advocates intensified their campaign to keep Daca intact while directing their pleas to Republicans in Congress. Youth groups launched a hunger strike in the Wisconsin congressional district represented by House speaker Paul Ryan, calling for legislation to make the status of Dreamers permanent.

leafcutter64 on September 5th, 2017 at 18:16 UTC »

I am a legal immigrant. In this entire debate, I feel that there is one voice that is simply glossed over - and that is what legal immigrants feel about how the Left treats undocumented/illegal immigrants. This is what I feel at a personal level...

Legally immigrating to the country is hard. I won't deny that. But it's still one of the most generous immigration standards among the first-world nations - that have growing and great job opportunities in the STEM field.

Here's the thing. For a third-worlder, unless, you are an exemplary paragon in your field, companies do not even bother interviewing you. The H1-B work visa is only granted* to those who have a job offer.

However, they do interview immigrants who are somehow in the US in the first place - legally. One would assume that you could enter the US as a tourist and take interviews, eh? NO! A B1/B2 (tourist visa) cannot be converted to a H1-B - as it shows the USCIS that you entered the country under false pretenses.

That leaves the grad-school option (F1 Visa). Most of us take up grad school for only one reason**. To enter the US under legal status, and have opportunity to interview. That's it. All that money spend on grad school (in US freakin dollars) - for playing your immigration game. we leave our third-world jobs, and use up our savings to fund grad school (they charge us more than out-of-state). With a third-world money/job - it may take 3 years of savings to pay for a semester of grad school. And, even after getting a job offer, the H1-B is still a grim lottery.

It's not over. H1-B is only valid for 6 years (renewed once at the 3 year mark). For third-worlders from China and India - the wait to even be granted a green card visa number is over 12 years***, as of now. And then give it 3-5 years to get a green card. And then, 5 more years to get naturalized. How many years was that in total, again? I lost count. Half of a legal immigrant's life is over.

I get it. The US is sovereign country. You have the right to protect your borders, and I acknowledge that immigration is a privilege, and not a right. I'll be honest. I am salty that I wasn't born in the US. But, I played by your rules. I paid my taxes and have a civic sense on par with your best. I have not sent a dime back to my country of nationality. The US is my home, yet I am not its Citizen. I am merely a legal immigrant.

It is disappointing to watch a scene that shows that breaking the rules would have been an easier path to becoming a naturalized citizen, than following your own immigration law.

I have read quite a few opinions on this sub that want DACA but want the H1-B gone at the same time (because legal immigrants compete for your white collar/STEM jobs). Utterly hypocritical.

There's a middle ground here. Let's do what's right by our 800k Dreamers. But, don't forget the ones who followed the law. Have heart that people from countries want to upgrade their life by moving to the US. Make it easier for them. Have a working visa that doesn't demand a job offer in the first place - but lets your look for jobs, while in the US (say, for 0.5-1 year). Make the path to citizenship easier, and not something that could easily take two decades.

Strongly punish outsourcing. Have the labor move here, and engage in the economy and contribute taxes. Assimilate and grow! Let us be Americans by our shared dream of a great culture, rather than a mere accident of birth.

* Subject to a lottery (as of right now, <35% success rate)

** Not all. Some folks have legit academic goals

*** I was born in Kuwait. The 7% country-of-birth green card visa doesn't cap for me. But, it does for India/China.

[edit] formatting

finnerpeace on September 5th, 2017 at 16:09 UTC »

How do other countries handle this, eh? Do other countries have amnesty programs for kids brought in illegally? Anyone know sensible solutions that have worked elsewhere?

DDT126 on September 5th, 2017 at 15:10 UTC »

"Donald Trump on Tuesday thrust the fate of nearly 800,000 young, undocumented migrants into uncertainty by terminating the Obama-era program that protects the so-called Dreamers from deportation.

New applications will no longer be accepted, while those currently in the program will all lose their status by March 2020, with the first permits expiring in March 2018 – unless Congress passes legislation allowing them to stay.

Attorney general Jeff Sessions announced the administration’s plans to phase out the 2012 policy known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca) by 5 March 2018, leaving Congress with six months to enact new protections for Dreamers through legislation."