American Physiological Society > High Achievers in Competitive Courses More Likely to Cheat on College Exams

Authored by the-aps.org and submitted by Wagamaga

The American Physiological Society Press Release

APS Contact: APS Communications Office Email: [email protected] Phone: 301.634.7209 Twitter: @APSPhysiology

High Achievers in Competitive Courses More Likely to Cheat on College Exams

Academic misconduct widespread on test reassessments

Bethesda, Md. (August 24, 2017)—A new study finds that students who are known as “high achievers” and take highly competitive courses are the most likely to cheat on their exams. The article is published ahead of print in Advances in Physiology Education.

Accurate statistics for academic misconduct are difficult to report due to the reliance on self-reporting by students. It has been thought that lower-level students were more likely to cheat because they had more to gain in the form of higher grades. However, researchers from the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada, found that the opposite was true in students who submitted tests for regrading. Regrading—submitting an unaltered exam for another look by the professor—is a common practice offered to students who think their original grade was not accurate.

The research team scanned more than 3,600 original exams from 11 undergraduate physiology-based courses to determine how frequently academic misconduct was committed. They examined 448 resubmitted tests for additions or deletions of text or additional markings that were not present on the original exams. The researchers found 78 cases of cheating, almost half of which were submitted by “repeat offenders”—students who had cheated on more than one test during the study period. The difference between male and female cheaters was insignificant. Two-thirds of the cases of academic misconduct were identified in one highly competitive course. “Our results point to high-achieving students as a specific group who may be more likely to commit these acts and show no indication that men are more frequent offenders than women, which goes against much of the existing [academic misconduct] literature,” the researchers wrote.

Read the full article, “Cheating after the test: who does it and how often?” published ahead of print in Advances in Physiology Education.

NOTE TO JOURNALISTS: To schedule an interview with a member of the research team, please contact the APS Communications Office or 301-634-7209. Find more research highlights in the APS Press Room.

StaplerLivesMatter on August 27th, 2017 at 17:35 UTC »

I don't know if I've ever seen a study that didn't show that extreme high-stakes testing environments result in cheating.

Much like all the findings around test-based incentives/punishments for teachers. When your income is on the line, you'll cheat to get the numbers. Nobody is going to shrug and say "I guess I deserve to be out of a job because I'm not performing well enough".

Andrado on August 27th, 2017 at 17:15 UTC »

I have degrees in economics, and I remember an undergrad professor saying, if there is a good way to cheat and get away with it, any rational person would do it. Forget the morality of whether or not it's or wrong to cheat, just take the immediate consequences and balance the potential costs and benefits. It was weird hearing a college professor tell us that, if we can get away with it, we should cheat. Problem is, it's not that hard to catch cheaters, and cheating leads to expulsion from most colleges.

UpAndComingNobody on August 27th, 2017 at 17:08 UTC »

Really what you"re seeing is how important grades are to the student not the content mastery .