Chronology of Supreme Court hearings in the right to privacy case:
July 7: Three-judge bench says issues arising out of Aadhaar should finally be decided by larger bench and CJI would take a call on need for setting up a constitution bench.
July: Matter mentioned before CJI who sets up a five-judge constitution bench to hear the matter.
July 18: Five-judge constitution bench decides to set up a nine-judge bench to decide whether the right to privacy can be declared a fundamental right under the Constitution. Nine-judge bench (Chief Justice J S Khehar, Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde, R K Agrawal, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Abhay Manohar Sapre, D Y Chandrachud, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and S Abdul Nazeer) constituted to hear the privacy matter.
July 19: SC says right to privacy can't be absolute, may be regulated.
July 19: Centre tells SC that right to privacy is not a fundamental right.
July 26: Karnataka, West Bengal, Punjab and Puducherry, the four non-BJP ruled states move SC in favour of right to privacy.
July 26: Centre tells SC that privacy can be fundamental
July 27: Maharashtra government tells SC that privacy is not a "standalone" right, but it is rather a concept.
August 1: Supreme Court says there has to be "overarching" guidelines to protect an individual's private information in public domain.
August 2: SC says protection of the concept of privacy in the technological era was a "losing battle", reserves verdict.
August 24: SC declares right to privacy as fundamental right under the Constitution.
Lo_Ti_Lurker on August 24th, 2017 at 05:37 UTC »
9-0 Judgement. Not even one out the nine judges agreed with the government's absurd argument. :respect:
ronan125 on August 24th, 2017 at 05:29 UTC »
I'm wondering how this impacts all the invasive data collection by companies. Like KFC asking to scan your boarding pass in the airport
StoneOfGlass on August 24th, 2017 at 05:24 UTC »
Whattay week for the Supreme Court.